scispace - formally typeset
P

Prasenjit Duara

Researcher at Duke University

Publications -  90
Citations -  3353

Prasenjit Duara is an academic researcher from Duke University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Nationalism & China. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 87 publications receiving 3110 citations. Previous affiliations of Prasenjit Duara include University of Chicago & George Mason University.

Papers
More filters
Book

Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China

TL;DR: Linear history and the nation-state Bifurcating linear histories in China and India as discussed by the authors, the campaigns against religion and the return of the repressed secret brotherhood and revolutionary discourse in China's Republican revolution the genealogy of Fengjian or feudalism - narratives of civil society and state provincial narratives of the nation - federalism and centralism in modern China critics of modernity in India and China
Book

Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern

TL;DR: In this paper, Manchukuo: A Historical Overview Part 5 Civilization and Sovereignty Chapter 3 6 Asianinsm and the New Discourse of Civilization Chapter 4 7 Embodying Civilization: Women and the Figure of Tradition within Modernity Part 8 The Authenticity of Spaces Chapter 5 10 Imperial Nationalism and the Frontier Chapter 6 11 Local Worlds: The Politics and Poetics of the Native Place Chapter 12 Conclusion Chapter 13 Glossary of Chinese Terms Chapter 14 glossary of Japanese Terms
Journal ArticleDOI

The Discourse of Civilization and Pan-Asianism

TL;DR: In the United States, a person may decline to take the oath of loyalty to the U.S. Constitution if this oath conflicts with a religious belief as discussed by the authors, which is the case in East Asia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Asia Redux: Conceptualizing a Region for Our Times

TL;DR: The recent rise of interest in Asian connections in the current time is thus unable to grasp the continuities and discontinuities that form the present as mentioned in this paper, and it is unable to evaluate the risks and possibilities of the present moment.