Q
Qiongxia Chen
Publications - 8
Citations - 55
Qiongxia Chen is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Multiple-criteria decision analysis & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 4 publications receiving 15 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
An ORESTE approach for multi-criteria decision-making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information
TL;DR: This study introduces the French organization Rangement Et Synthese De Ronnees Relationnelles’ (ORESTE) approach for MCDM with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information and the ORESTE approach is extended to probabilistically hesitant fuzzy environments.
Journal ArticleDOI
A consensus-based approach for multi-criteria decision making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information
TL;DR: A multi-criteria decision-making approach that considers consensus reaching among decision makers with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information with a new approach to derive normalized PHFE (NPHFE) is proposed to overcome the shortcomings in previous studies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Approaches for multicriteria decision-making based on the hesitant fuzzy best–worst method
TL;DR: Several decision-making models integrating HFPRs with the best worst method (BWM) are developed, and consistency measures from the perspectives of additive/multiplicative consistent hesitant fuzzy best worst preference relations (HFBWPRs) are introduced.
Posted ContentDOI
Decision-Making Models Based on Satisfaction Degree with Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relation
TL;DR: Decision-making models based on decision makers’ satisfaction degree with IHFPR are developed, and an illustrative example in conjunction with comparative analysis is used to demonstrate the proposed models are feasible and efficiency for practical MCDM problems.
Journal ArticleDOI
Group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus
TL;DR: In this paper , a group decision-making method considering additive consistency and consensus simultaneously was developed to address the situation where the evaluation information has different number of elements, where the values that need to be revised are identified first, and then design the local adjustment process.