ACCF
: American College of Cardiology Foundation
ACS
: acute coronary syndrome
AHA
: American Heart Association
CAD
: coronary artery disease
CABG
: coronary artery bypass grafting
CKMB
: creatine kinase MB isoform
cTn
: cardiac troponin
CT
: computed tomography
CV
: coefficient of variation
ECG
: electrocardiogram
ESC
: European Society of Cardiology
FDG
: fluorodeoxyglucose
h
: hour(s)
HF
: heart failure
LBBB
: left bundle branch block
LV
: left ventricle
LVH
: left ventricular hypertrophy
MI
: myocardial infarction
mIBG
: meta-iodo-benzylguanidine
min
: minute(s)
MONICA
: Multinational MONItoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease)
MPS
: myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
MRI
: magnetic resonance imaging
mV
: millivolt(s)
ng/L
: nanogram(s) per litre
Non-Q MI
: non-Q wave myocardial infarction
NSTEMI
: non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
PCI
: percutaneous coronary intervention
PET
: positron emission tomography
pg/mL
: pictogram(s) per millilitre
Q wave MI
: Q wave myocardial infarction
RBBB
: right bundle branch block
sec
: second(s)
SPECT
: single photon emission computed tomography
STEMI
: ST elevation myocardial infarction
ST–T
: ST-segment –T wave
URL
: upper reference limit
WHF
: World Heart Federation
WHO
: World Health Organization

Myocardial infarction (MI) can be recognised by clinical features, including electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, elevated values of biochemical markers (biomarkers) of myocardial necrosis, and by imaging, or may be defined by pathology. It is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. MI may be the first manifestation of coronary artery disease (CAD) or it may occur, repeatedly, in patients with established disease. Information on MI rates can provide useful information regarding the burden of CAD within and across populations, especially if standardized data are collected in a manner that …

/pdf/third-universal-definition-of-myocardial-infarction-1nbq846anm.pdf

Third universal definition of myocardial infarction

Background— Although most clinical trials of coronary stents have measured nominally identical safety and effectiveness end points, differences in definitions and timing of assessment have created confusion in interpretation. Methods and Results— The Academic Research Consortium is an informal collaboration between academic research organizations in the United States and Europe. Two meetings, in Washington, DC, in January 2006 and in Dublin, Ireland, in June 2006, sponsored by the Academic Research Consortium and including representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and all device manufacturers who were working with the Food and Drug Administration on drug-eluting stent clinical trial programs, were focused on consensus end point definitions for drug-eluting stent evaluations. The effort was pursued with the objective to establish consistency among end point definitions and provide consensus recommendations. On the basis of considerations from historical legacy to key pathophysiological mechani...

Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials A Case for Standardized Definitions

In 1991, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) convened a "Consensus Conference," the goals of which were to "provide a conceptual and a practical framework to define the systemic inflammatory response to infection, which is a progressive injurious process that falls under the generalized term 'sepsis' and includes sepsis-associated organ dysfunction as well. The general definitions introduced as a result of that conference have been widely used in practice, and have served as the foundation for inclusion criteria for numerous clinical trials of therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, there has been an impetus from experts in the field to modify these definitions to reflect our current understanding of the pathophysiology of these syndromes. Several North American and European intensive care societies agreed to revisit the definitions for sepsis and related conditions. This conference was sponsored by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the Surgical Infection Society (SIS). 29 participants attended the conference from Europe and North America. In advance of the conference, subgroups were formed to evaluate the following areas: signs and symptoms of sepsis, cell markers, cytokines, microbiologic data, and coagulation parameters.. The present manuscript serves as the final report of the 2001 International Sepsis Definitions Conference. 1. Current concepts of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock remain useful to clinicians and researchers. 2. These definitions do not allow precise staging or prognostication of the host response to infection. 3. While SIRS remains a useful concept, the diagnostic criteria for SIRS published in 1992 are overly sensitive and non-specific. 4. An expanded list of signs and symptoms of sepsis may better reflect the clinical response to infection. 6. PIRO, a hypothetical model for staging sepsis is presented, which, in the future, may better characterize the syndrome on the basis of predisposing factors and premorbid conditions, the nature of the underlying infection, the characteristics of the host response, and the extent of the resultant organ dysfunction.

2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference

Kristian Thygesen∗ (Denmark)

Joseph S. Alpert∗ (USA)

Allan S. Jaffe (USA)

Bernard R. Chaitman (USA)

Jeroen J. Bax (The Netherlands)

David A. Morrow (USA)

Harvey D. White∗ (New Zealand)

Hans Mickley (Denmark)

Filippo Crea (Italy)

Frans Van de Werf (Belgium)

Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci (

/pdf/fourth-universal-definition-of-myocardial-infarction-2018-4i6ulrg8ct.pdf

Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).

![Graphic][1] 

Myocardial infarction is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Coronary atherosclerosis is a chronic disease with stable and unstable periods. During unstable periods with activated inflammation in the vascular wall, patients may develop a myocardial infarction. Myocardial infarction may be a minor event in a lifelong chronic disease, it may even go undetected, but it may also be a major catastrophic event leading to sudden death or severe haemodynamic deterioration. A myocardial infarction may be the first manifestation of coronary artery disease, or it may occur, repeatedly, in patients with established disease. Information on myocardial infarction attack rates can provide useful data regarding the burden of coronary artery disease within and across populations, especially if standardized data are collected in a manner that demonstrates the distinction between incident and recurrent events. From the epidemiological point of view, the incidence of myocardial infarction in a population can be used as a proxy for the prevalence of coronary artery disease in that population. Furthermore, the term myocardial infarction has major psychological and legal implications for the individual and society. It is an indicator of one of the leading health problems in the world, and it is an outcome measure in clinical trials and observational studies. With these perspectives, myocardial infarction may be defined from a number of different clinical, electrocardiographic, biochemical, imaging, and pathological characteristics.

In the past, a general consensus existed for the clinical syndrome designated as myocardial infarction. In studies of disease prevalence, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined myocardial infarction from symptoms, ECG abnormalities, and enzymes. However, the development of more sensitive and specific serological biomarkers and precise imaging techniques allows detection of ever smaller amounts of myocardial necrosis. Accordingly, current clinical practice, health care delivery systems, as well as epidemiology and clinical trials all require a …

 [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif

/pdf/universal-definition-of-myocardial-infarction-3uelutsf9u.pdf

Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

This document was developed by a consensus conference initiated by Kristian Thygesen, MD, and Joseph S. Alpert, MD, after formal approval by Lars Ryden, MD, President of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and Arthur Garson, MD, President of the American College of Cardiology (ACC). All of the participants were selected for their expertise in the field they represented, with approximately one-half of the participants selected from each organization. Participants were instructed to review the scientific evidence in their area of expertise and to attend the consensus conference with prepared remarks. The first draft of the document was prepared during the consensus conference itself. Sources of funding appear in Appendix A. The recommendations made in this document represent the attitudes and opinions of the participants at the time of the conference, and these recommendations were revised subsequently. The conclusions reached will undoubtedly need to be revised as new scientific evidence becomes available. This document has been reviewed by members of the ESC Committee for Scientific and Clinical Initiatives and by members of the Board of the ESC who approved the document on April 15, 2000.

/pdf/myocardial-infarction-redefined-a-consensus-document-of-the-1purj3u22r.pdf

Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction

R. I. Levy

Papers

Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction