R
Rainer Brase
Publications - 4
Citations - 1038
Rainer Brase is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Placebo-controlled study. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 4 publications receiving 997 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Confirmatory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist trial in severe sepsis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Sepsis Investigator Group
Steven M. Opal,Charles J. Fisher,Jean-François Dhainaut,Jean Louis Vincent,Rainer Brase,Stephen F. Lowry,Jerald C. Sadoff,Gus J. Slotman,Howard Levy,Robert A. Balk,Maire P. Shelly,John Pribble,John F. LaBrecque,Janice Lookabaugh,Hugh Donovan,Howard Dubin,Robert P. Baughman,James Norman,Eric J. DeMaria,Klaus Matzel,Edward Abraham,Michael G. Seneff +21 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhlL-1ra) in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis.
Journal ArticleDOI
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody fragment afelimomab in hyperinflammatory response during severe sepsis: The RAMSES Study
Konrad Reinhart,Thilo Menges,Bengt Gårdlund,JH Zwaveling,Mark Smithes,Jean Louis Vincent,Jose M. Tellado,Antonio Salgado-Remigio,Reuven Zimlichman,Stuart Withington,Klaus Tschaikowsky,Rainer Brase,Pierre Damas,H Kupper,Joachim Kempeni,Juergen Eiselstein,Martin Kaul +16 more
TL;DR: The IL-6 immunostrip test identified two distinct sepsis populations with significantly different mortality rates and a small absolute reduction in mortality rate was found in the afelimomab-treated patients.
Journal ArticleDOI
A multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Jean Louis Vincent,Rainer Brase,Frederick Santman,Peter M. Suter,A McLuckie,Jean-François Dhainaut,Younchoi Park,Jacky Karmel +7 more
TL;DR: TLC C-53 was generally well-tolerated but failed to reduce mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation and there were no significant differences in demographics and baseline characteristics between the two groups.