scispace - formally typeset
R

Richard L. Daft

Researcher at Vanderbilt University

Publications -  47
Citations -  21910

Richard L. Daft is an academic researcher from Vanderbilt University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Information system & Organizational structure. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 47 publications receiving 20972 citations. Previous affiliations of Richard L. Daft include Queen's University & Texas A&M University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design

TL;DR: Models are proposed that show how organizations can be designed to meet the information needs of technology, interdepartmental relations, and the environment to both reduce uncertainty and resolve equivocality.
ReportDOI

Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design

TL;DR: The concept of information richness is introduced, and three models of information processing are proposed that describe (1) manager information behavior, (2) organizational mechanisms for coping with equivocality from the environment, and (3) organizational mechanism for internal coordination.
Journal ArticleDOI

Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: implications for information systems

TL;DR: The findings indicate that media vary in their capacity to convey information cues and that high performing managers are more sensitive to the relationship between message ambiguity and media richness than low performing managers.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the role of administrators and technical employees in the process leading to innovation adoption is examined, and a marked division of labor is found, indicating that two distinct i...
Journal ArticleDOI

Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics

TL;DR: The authors provide data on the role of academic-practitioner relationships in both generating and disseminating knowledge across boundaries, and make suggestions for increasing the value and relevance of future research to both academics and practitioners.