Showing papers by "Richard S. Judson published in 2022"

Systematic Evidence Map for Over One Hundred and Fifty Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

Abstract: Background: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large class of synthetic (man-made) chemicals widely used in consumer products and industrial processes. Thousands of distinct PFAS exist in commerce. The 2019 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Action Plan outlines a multiprogram national research plan to address the challenge of PFAS. One component of this strategy involves the use of systematic evidence map (SEM) approaches to characterize the evidence base for hundreds of PFAS. Objective: SEM methods were used to summarize available epidemiological and animal bioassay evidence for a set of ∼150 PFAS that were prioritized in 2019 by the U.S. EPA’s Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE) for in vitro toxicity and toxicokinetic assay testing. Methods: Systematic review methods were used to identify and screen literature using manual review and machine-learning software. The Populations, Exposures, Comparators, and Outcomes (PECO) criteria were kept broad to identify mammalian animal bioassay and epidemiological studies that could inform human hazard identification. A variety of supplemental content was also tracked, including information on in vitro model systems; exposure measurement–only studies in humans; and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME). Animal bioassay and epidemiology studies meeting PECO criteria were summarized with respect to study design, and health system(s) were assessed. Because animal bioassay studies with ≥21-d exposure duration (or reproductive/developmental study design) were most useful to CCTE analyses, these studies underwent study evaluation and detailed data extraction. All data extraction is publicly available online as interactive visuals with downloadable metadata. Results: More than 40,000 studies were identified from scientific databases. Screening processes identified 44 animal and 148 epidemiology studies from the peer-reviewed literature and 95 animal and 50 epidemiology studies from gray literature that met PECO criteria. Epidemiological evidence (available for 15 PFAS) mostly assessed the reproductive, endocrine, developmental, metabolic, cardiovascular, and immune systems. Animal evidence (available for 40 PFAS) commonly assessed effects in the reproductive, developmental, urinary, immunological, and hepatic systems. Overall, 45 PFAS had evidence across animal and epidemiology data streams. Discussion: Many of the ∼150 PFAS were data poor. Epidemiological and animal evidence were lacking for most of the PFAS included in our search. By disseminating this information, we hope to facilitate additional assessment work by providing the initial scoping literature survey and identifying key research needs. Future research on data-poor PFAS will help support a more complete understanding of the potential health effects from PFAS exposures. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10343

Predicting molecular initiating events using chemical target annotations and gene expression

Abstract: The advent of high-throughput transcriptomic screening technologies has resulted in a wealth of publicly available gene expression data associated with chemical treatments. From a regulatory perspective, data sets that cover a large chemical space and contain reference chemicals offer utility for the prediction of molecular initiating events associated with chemical exposure. Here, we integrate data from a large compendium of transcriptomic responses to chemical exposure with a comprehensive database of chemical-protein associations to train binary classifiers that predict mechanism(s) of action from transcriptomic responses. First, we linked reference chemicals present in the LINCS L1000 gene expression data collection to chemical identifiers in RefChemDB, a database of chemical-protein interactions. Next, we trained binary classifiers on MCF7 human breast cancer cell line derived gene expression profiles and chemical-protein labels using six classification algorithms to identify optimal analysis parameters. To validate classifier accuracy, we used holdout data sets, training-excluded reference chemicals, and empirical significance testing of null models derived from permuted chemical-protein associations. To identify classifiers that have variable predicting performance across training data derived from different cellular contexts, we trained a separate set of binary classifiers on the PC3 human prostate cancer cell line.We trained classifiers using expression data associated with chemical treatments linked to 51 molecular initiating events. This analysis identified and validated 9 high-performing classifiers with empirical p-values lower than 0.05 and internal accuracies ranging from 0.73 to 0.94 and holdout accuracies of 0.68 to 0.92. High-ranking predictions for training-excluded reference chemicals demonstrating that predictive accuracy extends beyond the set of chemicals used in classifier training. To explore differences in classifier performance as a function of training data cellular context, MCF7-trained classifier accuracies were compared to classifiers trained on the PC3 gene expression data for the same molecular initiating events.This methodology can offer insight in prioritizing candidate perturbagens of interest for targeted screens. This approach can also help guide the selection of relevant cellular contexts for screening classes of candidate perturbagens using cell line specific model performance.

Predicting molecular initiating events using chemical target annotations and gene expression

Abstract: The advent of high-throughput transcriptomic screening technologies has resulted in a wealth of publicly available gene expression data associated with chemical treatments. From a regulatory perspective, data sets that cover a large chemical space and contain reference chemicals offer utility for the prediction of molecular initiating events associated with chemical exposure. Here, we integrate data from a large compendium of transcriptomic responses to chemical exposure with a comprehensive database of chemical-protein associations to train binary classifiers that predict mechanism(s) of action from transcriptomic responses. First, we linked reference chemicals present in the LINCS L1000 gene expression data collection to chemical identifiers in RefChemDB, a database of chemical-protein interactions. Next, we trained binary classifiers on MCF7 human breast cancer cell line derived gene expression profiles and chemical-protein labels using six classification algorithms to identify optimal analysis parameters. To validate classifier accuracy, we used holdout data sets, training-excluded reference chemicals, and empirical significance testing of null models derived from permuted chemical-protein associations. To identify classifiers that have variable predicting performance across training data derived from different cellular contexts, we trained a separate set of binary classifiers on the PC3 human prostate cancer cell line.We trained classifiers using expression data associated with chemical treatments linked to 51 molecular initiating events. This analysis identified and validated 9 high-performing classifiers with empirical p-values lower than 0.05 and internal accuracies ranging from 0.73 to 0.94 and holdout accuracies of 0.68 to 0.92. High-ranking predictions for training-excluded reference chemicals demonstrating that predictive accuracy extends beyond the set of chemicals used in classifier training. To explore differences in classifier performance as a function of training data cellular context, MCF7-trained classifier accuracies were compared to classifiers trained on the PC3 gene expression data for the same molecular initiating events.This methodology can offer insight in prioritizing candidate perturbagens of interest for targeted screens. This approach can also help guide the selection of relevant cellular contexts for screening classes of candidate perturbagens using cell line specific model performance.

Navigating Transcriptomic Connectivity Mapping Workflows to Link Chemicals with Bioactivities.

Abstract: Screening new compounds for potential bioactivities against cellular targets is vital for drug discovery and chemical safety. Transcriptomics offers an efficient approach for assessing global gene expression changes, but interpreting chemical mechanisms from these data is often challenging. Connectivity mapping is a potential data-driven avenue for linking chemicals to mechanisms based on the observation that many biological processes are associated with unique gene expression signatures (gene signatures). However, mining the effects of a chemical on gene signatures for biological mechanisms is challenging because transcriptomic data contain thousands of noisy genes. New connectivity mapping approaches seeking to distinguish signal from noise continue to be developed, spurred by the promise of discovering chemical mechanisms, new drugs, and disease targets from burgeoning transcriptomic data. Here, we analyze these approaches in terms of diverse transcriptomic technologies, public databases, gene signatures, pattern-matching algorithms, and statistical evaluation criteria. To navigate the complexity of connectivity mapping, we propose a harmonized scheme to coherently organize and compare published workflows. We first standardize concepts underlying transcriptomic profiles and gene signatures based on various transcriptomic technologies such as microarrays, RNA-Seq, and L1000 and discuss the widely used data sources such as Gene Expression Omnibus, ArrayExpress, and MSigDB. Next, we generalize connectivity mapping as a pattern-matching task for finding similarity between a query (e.g., transcriptomic profile for new chemical) and a reference (e.g., gene signature of known target). Published pattern-matching approaches fall into two main categories: vector-based use metrics like correlation, Jaccard index, etc., and aggregation-based use parametric and nonparametric statistics (e.g., gene set enrichment analysis). The statistical methods for evaluating the performance of different approaches are described, along with comparisons reported in the literature on benchmark transcriptomic data sets. Lastly, we review connectivity mapping applications in toxicology and offer guidance on evaluating chemical-induced toxicity with concentration-response transcriptomic data. In addition to serving as a high-level guide and tutorial for understanding and implementing connectivity mapping workflows, we hope this review will stimulate new algorithms for evaluating chemical safety and drug discovery using transcriptomic data.