scispace - formally typeset
R

Robert L. Schmidt

Researcher at University of Utah

Publications -  195
Citations -  3957

Robert L. Schmidt is an academic researcher from University of Utah. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Population. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 181 publications receiving 3274 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert L. Schmidt include ARUP Laboratories & University of Minnesota.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Parotid Gland Lesions

TL;DR: It is not possible to provide a general guideline on the clinical usefulness of FNAC for parotid gland lesions owing to the variability in study results, and there is a need to improve the quality of reporting and study designs to remove or assess the impact of bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent progress in modeling R&D project-selection processes

TL;DR: A review of the progress that has been made in the development of quantitative models of R&D project-selection processes is given in this paper, where future research needs in the area are assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding Sources of Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

TL;DR: This issue uses principles to evaluate diagnostic studies associated with a specific diagnostic test for risk of bias and reporting quality and concludes there are several sources of bias that are unique to diagnostic accuracy studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Needle Size Has Only a Limited Effect on Outcomes in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: In the evaluation of pancreatic and peri-pancreatic lesions by EUS–FNA, 25G needles may confer an advantage in adequacy relative to 22G needles but confer no advantages with respect to accuracy, number of passes, or complications.
Journal ArticleDOI

The influence of rapid onsite evaluation on the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the influence of ROSE on FNA adequacy found that on average, ROSE improves the adequacy rate by 12%, but there was considerable variability across studies.