scispace - formally typeset
R

Robin A. Murphy

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  70
Citations -  1270

Robin A. Murphy is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Associative learning & Context (language use). The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 63 publications receiving 1172 citations. Previous affiliations of Robin A. Murphy include McGill University & University of Hertfordshire.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rule Learning by Rats

TL;DR: It is reported that Rattus norvegicus can learn simple rules and apply them to new situations and, like humans, can transfer structural knowledge from sequential experiences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations.

TL;DR: The results suggest that several task parameters determine the involvement of the hippocampus in configural learning; however, all tasks tested can also be learned to some extent in the absence of an intact hippocampal system, presumably by other learning/memory systems that remain intact following surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Depressive realism and outcome density bias in contingency judgments: the effect of the context and intertrial interval.

TL;DR: In two experiments, the authors tested the DR hypothesis using an action-outcome contingency judgment task, suggesting that depressed mood is accompanied by reduced contextual processing rather than increased judgment accuracy, and is consistent with a cognitive distortion view of depression.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stereotype formation: Biased by association

TL;DR: Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that differences in the experienced predictiveness of groups with respect to evaluatively neutral information influence the extent to which participants later form attitudes and stereotypes about those groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies

TL;DR: It is proposed that a context-processing difference between depressed and nondepressed people removes any objective notion of “realism” that was originally employed to explain the depressive realism effect.