scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Ronald Klein published in 1986"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A system for grading the severity of diabetic retinopathy that is a rapid, relatively inexpensive, and standardized alternative to the more detailed Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) system is presented; data is presented on its reproducibility; and it is compared to the detailed ETDRS grading system.

313 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that microaneurysm counts from fluorescein angiograms accurately reflect the severity of important signs in early diabetic retinopathy.

82 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comparison between information obtained from response to the question "Have you been told that the diabetes has affected the back of your eyes, that is, the retina?" and the determination of the severity of retinopathy by grading of stereoscopic fundus photographs is presented.
Abstract: This report presents the results of a comparison between information obtained from response to the question "Have you been told that the diabetes has affected the back of your eyes, that is, the retina?" and the determination of the severity of retinopathy by grading of stereoscopic fundus photographs. Both "younger onset" (n = 996) and "older onset" (n = 1,370) persons who participated in a large population-based study of diabetic persons in southern Wisconsin from 1980-1982 were included. For the younger onset persons, 31.1% responded positively, while 70.7% were found to have retinopathy. The sensitivity of the questionnaire response varied from 17.8% for persons with mild nonproliferative retinopathy to 81.9% for persons with proliferative retinopathy. The specificity was 97.3%. For the older onset persons, 14.9% responded positively, while 54.2% were found to have retinopathy. The sensitivity of the question varied from 9.9% for persons with mild nonproliferative retinopathy to 68.7% for persons with proliferative retinopathy. The specificity was 93.3%. The question used in this survey provides a highly specific measure of prevalence; it is most sensitive for proliferative retinopathy.

25 citations