Summary Background Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have antitumour activity against metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers with DNA damage response (DDR) alterations in genes involved directly or indirectly in homologous recombination repair (HRR). In this study, we assessed the PARP inhibitor talazoparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers with DDR-HRR alterations. Methods In this open-label, phase 2 trial (TALAPRO-1), participants were recruited from 43 hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, South Korea, the UK, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they were men aged 18 years or older with progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancers of adenocarcinoma histology, measurable soft-tissue disease (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1]), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, DDR-HRR gene alterations reported to sensitise to PARP inhibitors (ie, ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), had received one or two taxane-based chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease, and progressed on enzalutamide or abiraterone, or both, for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers. Eligible patients were given oral talazoparib (1 mg per day; or 0·75 mg per day in patients with moderate renal impairment) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate, defined as best overall soft-tissue response of complete or partial response per RECIST 1.1, by blinded independent central review. The primary endpoint was assessed in patients who received study drug, had measurable soft-tissue disease, and had a gene alteration in one of the predefined DDR-HRR genes. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03148795 , and is ongoing. Findings Between Oct 18, 2017, and March 20, 2020, 128 patients were enrolled, of whom 127 received at least one dose of talazoparib (safety population) and 104 had measurable soft-tissue disease (antitumour activity population). Data cutoff for this analysis was Sept 4, 2020. After a median follow-up of 16·4 months (IQR 11·1–22·1), the objective response rate was 29·8% (31 of 104 patients; 95% CI 21·2–39·6). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (39 [31%] of 127 patients), thrombocytopenia (11 [9%]), and neutropenia (ten [8%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 43 (34%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation Talazoparib showed durable antitumour activity in men with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers with DDR-HRR gene alterations who had been heavily pretreated. The favourable benefit–risk profile supports the study of talazoparib in larger, randomised clinical trials, including in patients with non-BRCA alterations. Funding Pfizer/Medivation.

/pdf/talazoparib-monotherapy-in-metastatic-castration-resistant-2sldtmm5rx.pdf

Talazoparib monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair alterations (TALAPRO-1): an open-label, phase 2 trial

PARP inhibitors are approved for treating advanced prostate cancers (APC) with various defective DNA repair genes; however, further studies to clinically qualify predictive biomarkers are warranted. Herein we analyzed TOPARP-B phase II clinical trial samples, evaluating whole-exome and low-pass whole-genome sequencing and IHC and IF assays evaluating ATM and RAD51 foci (testing homologous recombination repair function). BRCA1/2 germline and somatic pathogenic mutations associated with similar benefit from olaparib; greater benefit was observed with homozygous BRCA2 deletion. Biallelic, but not monoallelic, PALB2 deleterious alterations were associated with clinical benefit. In the ATM cohort, loss of ATM protein by IHC was associated with a better outcome. RAD51 foci loss identified tumors with biallelic BRCA and PALB2 alterations while most ATM- and CDK12-altered APCs had higher RAD51 foci levels. Overall, APCs with homozygous BRCA2 deletion are exceptional responders; PALB2 biallelic loss and loss of ATM IHC expression associated with clinical benefit. Significance: Not all APCs with DNA repair defects derive similar benefit from PARP inhibition. Most benefit was seen among patients with BRCA2 homozygous deletions, biallelic loss of PALB2, and loss of ATM protein. Loss of RAD51 foci, evaluating homologous recombination repair function, was found primarily in tumors with biallelic BRCA1/2 and PALB2 alterations. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659

/pdf/biomarkers-associating-with-parp-inhibitor-benefit-in-3y1sqfp38w.pdf

Biomarkers Associating with PARP Inhibitor Benefit in Prostate Cancer in the TOPARP-B Trial.

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021.

The treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have become a mainstay of therapy in ovarian cancer and other malignancies, including BRCA-mutant breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. However, a growing number of patients develop resistance to PARPis, highlighting the need to further understand the mechanisms of PARPi resistance and develop effective treatment strategies. Targeting cell cycle checkpoint protein kinases, e.g., ATR, CHK1, and WEE1, which are upregulated in response to replication stress, represents one such therapeutic approach for PARPi-resistant cancers. Mechanistically, activated cell cycle checkpoints promote cell cycle arrest, replication fork stabilization, and DNA repair, demonstrating the interplay of DNA repair proteins with replication stress in the development of PARPi resistance. Inhibitors of these cell cycle checkpoints are under investigation in PARPi-resistant ovarian and other cancers. In this review, we discuss the cell cycle checkpoints and their roles beyond mere cell cycle regulation as part of the arsenal to overcome PARPi-resistant cancers. We also address the current status and recent advancements as well as limitations of cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials. 

http://manuscript.elsevier.com/S1043661822001074/pdf/S1043661822001074.pdf

Cell Cycle Checkpoints and Beyond: Exploiting the ATR/CHK1/WEE1 Pathway for the Treatment of PARP Inhibitor-Resistant Cancer.

https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/84869/4/ATM%20Supplementary%20final%2007Oct2020.pdf

Advanced Prostate Cancer with ATM Loss: PARP and ATR Inhibitors

TPS209 Background: Multiple lines of evidence suggest a crosstalk between androgen receptor (AR) signaling and DNA damage repair (DDR) in prostate cancer. Co-targeting both pathways in mHNPC can result in a clinically relevant synergistic effect. ZZFIRST trial is evaluating the combination of TALA –a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor– and EZ –an AR signaling inhibitor– in mHNPC patients. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, investigator-initiated phase 2 clinical trial. Men aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed mHNPC, an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥4 ng/mL at enrolment are eligible. Patients must have not received previous systemic treatment for locally advanced or mHNPC. A total of 54 patients will start treatment with EZ 160 mg/day for 2 28-day cycles in addition to standard androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients are then randomized and stratified based on homologous recombination gene alterations on a 1:2 ratio to either continue EZ 160 mg/day, or to receive EZ 160 mg/day plus TALA 0.5 mg/day. In both arms, patients will continue ADT throughout the trial. Treatment will continue until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. PSA will be determined every 4 weeks and radiological tumor extend will be assessed at screening and every 8 weeks for the 6 initial months of treatment and every 12 weeks thereafter until PD. Primary endpoint is PSA-complete response defined as the percentage of patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL at 12 months of therapy. Secondary endpoints include PSA-complete response at any time point and at month 7, PSA response ( < 4 ng/ml) at 7 and 12 months, PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiologic PFS, time to castration resistance based on PSA-PFS and rPFS, and overall survival. Safety will be assessed as per NCI-CTCAE 5.0. Exploratory endpoints include analysis of transcriptional changes in AR and DDR pathways and assessment of genomic signatures on tumor and liquid biopsies collected at baseline, 4 weeks, and PD. An imaging sub-study of whole-body diffusion weighted MRI will help to further study antitumor activity and drug resistance mechanisms. This trial was opened to accrual in July 2020. Currently 44 patients have been enrolled (with 37 randomized by cycle 3 day 1) out of 54 expected. Analysis will be assessed with the exact binomial test. At least 11 patients must maintain PSA < 0.2 ng/mL by 12 months of therapy among 32 evaluable patients in the combination arm to justify further investigation of this strategy. A drop-out rate of 10% has been considered. Clinical trial information: NCT04332744.

A randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the antitumor activity of enzalutamide (EZ) and talazoparib (TALA) for the treatment of metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC): ZZFIRST.

Sarai Cordoba

Papers

Advanced Prostate Cancer with ATM Loss: PARP and ATR Inhibitors

A randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the antitumor activity of enzalutamide (EZ) and talazoparib (TALA) for the treatment of metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC): ZZFIRST.