scispace - formally typeset
S

Scott Ferson

Researcher at University of Liverpool

Publications -  180
Citations -  10472

Scott Ferson is an academic researcher from University of Liverpool. The author has contributed to research in topics: Probabilistic logic & Probability bounds analysis. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 164 publications receiving 9843 citations. Previous affiliations of Scott Ferson include Stony Brook University & Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Papers
More filters
ReportDOI

Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory

Kari Sentz, +1 more
TL;DR: This report surveys a number of possible combination rules for Dempster-Shafer structures and provides examples of the implementation of these rules for discrete and interval-valued data.
Book

Risk assessment in conservation biology

TL;DR: A framework for risk assessment using the Exonential model for population growth, the logistic equation and magpie geese as a model for suburban shrews, and other forms of density dependence.
ReportDOI

Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures

TL;DR: A variety of the most useful and commonly applied methods for obtaining Dempster-Shafer structures, and their mathematical kin probability boxes, from empirical information or theoretical knowledge are summarized.
Journal ArticleDOI

Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability

TL;DR: It is argued that the two kinds of uncertainty should be propagated through mathematical expressions with different calculation methods, basically, interval analysis should be used to propagate ignorance, and probability theory should beused to propagate variability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Challenge problems: uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters

TL;DR: This paper describes the challenge problems and gives numerical values for the different input parameters so that results from different investigators can be directly compared and develop a better understanding of the relative advantages and disadvantages of traditional and newer methods.