Congestion is a cardinal sign of heart failure (HF). In the past, it was seen as a homogeneous epiphenomenon that identified patients with advanced HF. However, current evidence shows that congestion in HF varies in quantity and distribution. This updated view advocates for a congestive‐driven classification of HF according to onset (acute vs. chronic), regional distribution (systemic vs. pulmonary), compartment of distribution (intravascular vs. extravascular), and clinical vs. subclinical. Thus, this review will focus on the utility of circulating biomarkers for assessing and managing the different fluid overload phenotypes. This discussion focused on the clinical utility of the natriuretic peptides, carbohydrate antigen 125 (also called mucin 16), bio‐adrenomedullin and mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin, ST2 (also known as interleukin‐1 receptor‐like 1), cluster of differentiation 146, troponin, C‐terminal pro‐endothelin‐1, and parameters of haemoconcentration. The utility of circulation biomarkers on top of clinical evaluation, haemodynamics, and imaging needs to be better determined by dedicated studies. Some multiparametric frameworks in which these tools contribute to management are proposed.

/pdf/congestion-in-heart-failure-a-circulating-biomarker-based-2n4ik2fb.pdf

Congestion in heart failure: a circulating biomarker‐based perspective. A review from the Biomarkers Working Group of the Heart Failure Association, European Society of Cardiology

Congestion plays a major role in the pathogenesis, presentation, and prognosis of heart failure and is an important therapeutic target. However, its severity and organ and compartment distribution vary widely among patients, illustrating the complexity of this phenomenon. Although clinical symptoms and signs are useful to assess congestion and manage volume status in individual patients, they have limited sensitivity and do not allow identification of congestion phenotype. This leads to diagnostic uncertainty and hampers therapeutic decision-making. The present article provides an updated overview of circulating biomarkers, imaging modalities (ie, cardiac and extracardiac ultrasound), and invasive techniques that might help clinicians to identify different congestion profiles and guide the management strategy in this diverse population of high-risk patients with heart failure. 

Assessment of filling pressures and fluid overload in heart failure: an updated perspective.

La congestión desempeña un papel fundamental en la patogénesis, la presentación y el pronóstico de la insuficiencia cardiaca y es un objetivo terapéutico importante. Sin embargo, su gravedad y su distribución por órganos y compartimentos varían mucho entre los pacientes, lo que ilustra la complejidad de este fenómeno. Aunque los síntomas y signos clínicos son útiles para evaluar la congestión y controlar el estado del volumen en un paciente individual, tienen poca sensibilidad y no permiten fenotipificar la congestión. Esto conduce a la incertidumbre diagnóstica y dificulta la toma de decisiones terapéuticas. En este artículo se ofrece una visión general actualizada de los biomarcadores circulantes, las modalidades de imagen (es decir, la ecografía cardiaca y extracardiaca) y las técnicas invasivas que podrían ayudar a los clínicos a identificar los diferentes perfiles de congestión y guiar la estrategia de tratamiento para esta población diversa de pacientes de alto riesgo con insuficiencia cardiaca. Congestion plays a major role in the pathogenesis, presentation, and prognosis of heart failure and is an important therapeutic target. However, its severity and organ and compartment distribution vary widely among patients, illustrating the complexity of this phenomenon. Although clinical symptoms and signs are useful to assess congestion and manage volume status in individual patients, they have limited sensitivity and do not allow identification of congestion phenotype. This leads to diagnostic uncertainty and hampers therapeutic decision-making. The present article provides an updated overview of circulating biomarkers, imaging modalities (ie, cardiac and extracardiac ultrasound), and invasive techniques that might help clinicians to identify different congestion profiles and guide the management strategy in this diverse population of high-risk patients with heart failure. 

Evaluación de las presiones de llenado y la sobrecarga de volumen en la insuficiencia cardiaca: una visión actualizada

Point of care lung ultrasound (POCUS) has been recently used to assess prognosis in COVID-19 patients. However, there are no data comparing POCUS and chest-X ray, a technique widely used.Retrospective analysis in stable COVID-19 patients. Schalekamp radiological lung scale and LUZ-Score ultrasound scale were compared. Primary end-point was in-hospital death and/or need for Intensive Care Unit admission.A total of 138 patients were included. Median Schalekamp scale was 2 (2) and median LUZ-Score scale was 21 (10). No significant correlation was observed between both techniques. Patients with a LUZ-Score ≥ 21 points at admission had worse lung function and higher concentrations of LDH, CRP and Interleuquine-6. Schalekamp scale failed to identify patients at a higher risk at admission for the primary end-point. Addition of POCUS to a previous clinical model, improved risk prediction (AUC 0.805 [95% CI: 0.662-0.948]; P = <0.001).Chest X-ray and POCUS showed no correlation at admission in this analysis. Only POCUS identified a group of patients with greater clinical and analytical involvement. POCUS improved, previous clinical model, while chest X-ray did not add relevant predictive information for the primary endpoint.La ecografía torácica es una técnica novedosa para estratificar el riesgo de los pacientes COVID-19. Sin embargo, no existen datos que comparen dicha técnica con la radiografía de tórax, una técnica ampliamente utilizada en esta enfermedad.Análisis retrospectivo en pacientes estables COVID-19. Se compararon la escala de daño pulmonar radiológica de Schalekamp y ecográfica de LUZ-Score. El objetivo primario fue la muerte intrahospitalaria o la necesidad de ingreso en la UCI para tratamiento con ventilación mecánica.Se reclutaron 138 pacientes. La mediana de la escala de Schalekamp fue de 2 (2) y la del LUZ-Score de 21 (10). No se objetivó una correlación significativa entre ambas escalas. Los pacientes con un LUZ-Score ≥ 21 puntos al ingreso presentaron peor función pulmonar y mayores concentraciones de LDH, PCR e interleucina-6. La escala radiológica de Schalekamp no logró identificar a una población de mayor riesgo. Únicamente la adición de la ecografía pulmonar a un modelo de valoración clínica mejoró de manera significativa el área bajo la curva para el objetivo primario (ABC 0,805 [IC 95%: 0,662−0,948]; p ≤ 0,001).No se objetivó una correlación entre la afectación radiológica y la ecográfica. Únicamente la ecografía pulmonar identificó un subgrupo de pacientes con una mayor afectación clínico-analítica. La ecografía pulmonar mejoró el modelo de predicción clínico, mientras que la radiografía de tórax no añadió información relevante. 

Comparative analysis of chest radiography and lung ultrasound to predict intra-hospital prognosis of patients admitted for acute SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (COVID-19)

This editorial refers to ‘Utility of plasma CA125 as a proxy of intra-abdominal pressure in patients with acute heart failure’ by J. Rubio-Gracia et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuac046. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is more than just a vital sign. High IAP, or intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) (defined by a sustained or repeated elevation in IAP ≥ 12 mmHg), measured at end-expiration, in a supine patient and in the presence of abdominal musculature at rest is strongly associated with both organ system failure and mortality in the critically ill patient1 (Figure 1). Measurement of IAP also allows an accurate assessment of abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and IAP.2 This, like mean perfusion pressure (MPP), calculated as MAP minus central venous pressure (CVP) may be a specific marker for resistive abdominal forces and is closely associated with acute kidney injury (AKI).3,4 While mild-to-moderate IAH per se may be medically managed, including improvement of abdominal compliance, aggressive deresuscitation (in case of fluid accumulation),5 or increasing perfusion pressure (systolic arterial pressure or MAP), a sustained increase of IAP >20 mmHg in the presence of new organ system injury, despite medical treatment defines abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and necessitates emergent surgical decompression.6 

/pdf/biomarkers-for-intra-abdominal-pressure-another-tool-in-the-2ohmdh2w.pdf

Biomarkers for intra-abdominal pressure: another tool in the toolbox?

AIMS
Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is now considered a potential contributor to organ damage and disease progression in acute heart failure (AHF). In this work, we aimed to determine if antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) is associated with IAP and to identify a cutpoint of CA125 useful for ruling out intra-abdominal hypertension (defined as IAP ≥ 12 mmHg).


METHODS AND RESULTS
We prospectively evaluated a cohort of 53 patients admitted with AHF in which IAP was measured within the first 24-h of admission. The mean age was 80 ± 8 years, 31 (58.5%) were female, and 31 (58.5%) had left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The median plasma levels of NT-proBNP and CA125 were 3830 pg/mL (2417-8929) and 45.8 U/mL (29.8-114.0), respectively. The median of IAP was 15 mmHg (11-17), and 39 (73%) patients had an IAP ≥ 12 mmHg. The diagnostic performance of CA125 for identifying an IAP ≥ 12 mmHg was tested using the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The cut-off for CA125 of 17.1 U/mL showed a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 50%, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.71. After multivariate adjustment, CA125 remained non-linearly and positively associated with higher IAP (P-value = 0.003), explaining almost 28% of the model's variability (R2: 27.6%).


CONCLUSIONS
Patients with AHF and intra-abdominal hypertension had higher CA125 plasma levels. A baseline concentration of CA125 below 17.1 U/mL will increase the odds of identifying a subset of patients with normal IAP.

Utility of plasma CA125 as a proxy of intra-abdominal pressure in patients with acute heart failure.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcle.2022.01.024

Silvia Crespo-Aznárez

Papers

Utility of plasma CA125 as a proxy of intra-abdominal pressure in patients with acute heart failure.

Comparative analysis of chest radiography and lung ultrasound to predict intra-hospital prognosis of patients admitted for acute SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (COVID-19)

Comparative analysis of chest radiography and lung ultrasound to predict intra-hospital prognosis of patients admitted for acute SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (COVID-19)

Evaluation of intra-abdominal pressure as an early marker of diuretic response in patients with cardiorenal syndrome