ABCD
: Appropriate Blood pressure Control in Diabetes
ABI
: ankle–brachial index
ABPM
: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
ACCESS
: Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survival
ACCOMPLISH
: Avoiding Cardiovascular Events in Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension
ACCORD
: Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
ACE
: angiotensin-converting enzyme
ACTIVE I
: Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events
ADVANCE
: Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation
AHEAD
: Action for HEAlth in Diabetes
ALLHAT
: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart ATtack
ALTITUDE
: ALiskiren Trial In Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-renal Endpoints
ANTIPAF
: ANgioTensin II Antagonist In Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
APOLLO
: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Aliskiren in the Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events in Elderly People
ARB
: angiotensin receptor blocker
ARIC
: Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities
ARR
: aldosterone renin ratio
ASCOT
: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ASCOT-LLA
: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm
ASTRAL
: Angioplasty and STenting for Renal Artery Lesions
A-V
: atrioventricular
BB
: beta-blocker
BMI
: body mass index
BP
: blood pressure
BSA
: body surface area
CA
: calcium antagonist
CABG
: coronary artery bypass graft
CAPPP
: CAPtopril Prevention Project
CAPRAF
: CAndesartan in the Prevention of Relapsing Atrial Fibrillation
CHD
: coronary heart disease
CHHIPS
: Controlling Hypertension and Hypertension Immediately Post-Stroke
CKD
: chronic kidney disease
CKD-EPI
: Chronic Kidney Disease—EPIdemiology collaboration
CONVINCE
: Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of CV Endpoints
CT
: computed tomography
CV
: cardiovascular
CVD
: cardiovascular disease
D
: diuretic
DASH
: Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
DBP
: diastolic blood pressure
DCCT
: Diabetes Control and Complications Study
DIRECT
: DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials
DM
: diabetes mellitus
DPP-4
: dipeptidyl peptidase 4
EAS
: European Atherosclerosis Society
EASD
: European Association for the Study of Diabetes
ECG
: electrocardiogram
EF
: ejection fraction
eGFR
: estimated glomerular filtration rate
ELSA
: European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis
ESC
: European Society of Cardiology
ESH
: European Society of Hypertension
ESRD
: end-stage renal disease
EXPLOR
: Amlodipine–Valsartan Combination Decreases Central Systolic Blood Pressure more Effectively than the Amlodipine–Atenolol Combination
FDA
: U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FEVER
: Felodipine EVent Reduction study
GISSI-AF
: Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico-Atrial Fibrillation
HbA1c
: glycated haemoglobin
HBPM
: home blood pressure monitoring
HOPE
: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation
HOT
: Hypertension Optimal Treatment
HRT
: hormone replacement therapy
HT
: hypertension
HYVET
: HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial
IMT
: intima-media thickness
I-PRESERVE
: Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Systolic Function
INTERHEART
: Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors associated with Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries
INVEST
: INternational VErapamil SR/T Trandolapril
ISH
: Isolated systolic hypertension
JNC
: Joint National Committee
JUPITER
: Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin
LAVi
: left atrial volume index
LIFE
: Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertensives
LV
: left ventricle/left ventricular
LVH
: left ventricular hypertrophy
LVM
: left ventricular mass
MDRD
: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease
MRFIT
: Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
MRI
: magnetic resonance imaging
NORDIL
: The Nordic Diltiazem Intervention study
OC
: oral contraceptive
OD
: organ damage
ONTARGET
: ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial
PAD
: peripheral artery disease
PATHS
: Prevention And Treatment of Hypertension Study
PCI
: percutaneous coronary intervention
PPAR
: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
PREVEND
: Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENdstage Disease
PROFESS
: Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Secondary Strokes
PROGRESS
: Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study
PWV
: pulse wave velocity
QALY
: Quality adjusted life years
RAA
: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
RAS
: renin-angiotensin system
RCT
: randomized controlled trials
RF
: risk factor
ROADMAP
: Randomized Olmesartan And Diabetes MicroAlbuminuria Prevention
SBP
: systolic blood pressure
SCAST
: Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Candesartan for Treatment of Acute STroke
SCOPE
: Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly
SCORE
: Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation
SHEP
: Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program
STOP
: Swedish Trials in Old Patients with Hypertension
STOP-2
: The second Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension
SYSTCHINA
: SYSTolic Hypertension in the Elderly: Chinese trial
SYSTEUR
: SYSTolic Hypertension in Europe
TIA
: transient ischaemic attack
TOHP
: Trials Of Hypertension Prevention
TRANSCEND
: Telmisartan Randomised AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease
UKPDS
: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study
VADT
: Veterans' Affairs Diabetes Trial
VALUE
: Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation
WHO
: World Health Organization

### 1.1 Principles

The 2013 guidelines on hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology …

/pdf/2013-esh-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-arterial-4ydvs5ifsx.pdf

2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

https://caltcm.memberclicks.net/assets/documents/acc_aha_chf_2013_guidelines.pdf

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes

Objective:To provide an update to the “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock,” last published in 2008.Design:A consensus committee of 68 international experts representing 30 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at ke

Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.

Recent research indicates that inpatients with hyperglycemia suffer poor outcomes. Efforts to improve glycemic control need measures of performance. We proposed candidate measures, but these require analysis of large glucose datasets, a cumbersome task for individual institutions. We developed an application accessible over the internet that facilitates computation of these performance measures.

Computing performance measures for inpatient glucose management.

\n \n \n In DAPA-HF, compared to placebo, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor, dapagliflozin, reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The majority of patients in DAPA-HF reported mild functional limitation, however there is significant heterogeneity in prognosis among these patients.\n \n \n \n To examine the effect of dapagliflozin compared with placebo across the spectrum of baseline risk in DAPA-HF.\n \n \n \n The primary composite outcome of DAPA-HF was time-to-first cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure event (hospitalization for heart failure or outpatient visit requiring intravenous therapy). We examined whether the effect of dapagliflozin was modified by baseline risk, as determined by the MAGGIC (Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure) risk score based upon 13 predictive variables giving a potential maximum score of 57. The number needed to treat (NNT) to over a median follow-up of 18.2 months was calculated by applying the overall relative risk reduction in DAPA-HF (26%, 95% CI 15–35) to the proportion of patients with a primary outcome event in the placebo group of each MAGGIC risk score category (defined by quintiles of score).\n \n \n \n The MAGGIC risk score was calculable for 4740 of 4744 patients in DAPA-HF. The median score was 22 (range 3–43). The event rate for the primary outcome was 7.2 per 100 patient-years in the lowest risk score quintile and 25.7 in the highest. A 1-point increase in score was associated with an 8% increase in the risk of a primary outcome event (p<0.001). Dapagliflozin, compared to placebo, reduced the risk of the primary outcome across quintiles of the MAGGIC risk score (Figure - Interaction p value=0.69) and when the score was analysed as a continuous variable (Interaction p value=0.56). The NNT to prevent one primary event was 39 (95% CI 29–68) in the lowest quintile of risk scores, compared with 14 (11–25) in the highest quintile (Figure).\n Similar results were found for the individual components of the primary composite outcome and for all-cause mortality.\n \n \n \n DAPA-HF included patients with a wide spectrum of risk. Treatment with dapagliflozin, compared to placebo, reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure, irrespective of baseline risk as measured by the MAGGIC risk score.\n \n \n \n \n Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): DAPA-HF was funded by AstraZeneca\n

The effect of dapagliflozin across the spectrum of baseline risk: a post-hoc analysis of DAPA-HF

In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), empagliflozin reduced the risk of hospitalization for HF (HHF) by 35% (HR [95%CI] 0.65 [0.50-0.85]), CV death/HHF by 34% (0.66 [0.55-0.79]), and CV death by 38% (0.62 [0.49-0.77]) with an early separation of the cumulative incidence curves. We aimed to explore at what time point after randomization the benefits became apparent. Overall, 7020 patients were treated with empagliflozin 10, 25 mg or placebo. We expressed time trajectories for the effect of pooled empagliflozin doses vs. placebo on HHF, CV death/HHF and CV death based on Hazard Ratios (HRs) (95% CI), and calculated the HR on the day the effect reached significance using Cox proportional hazards models. The reduction in risk with empagliflozin vs. placebo reached significance at day 17 for HHF [0.10 [0.01, 0.87), p=0.0372], and day 27 for CV death/HHF [HR 0.28 (0.08, 0.97), p=0.0445], and sustained significant throughout follow-up (Figure). The benefit on CV death reached significance for the first time at day 59 [HR 0.28 (0.08, 0.96)]. HRs stabilized as the number of patients with events increased over time. The benefit of empagliflozin in reducing the risk of HHF, CV death/HHF and CV death emerged within weeks after treatment initiation in EMPA-REG OUTCOME. The earliest effect appears to be on HHF. Disclosure S. Verma: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company, EOCI Pharmacomm, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Toronto Knowledge Translation Working Group. L.A. Leiter: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, HLS Therapeutics, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi, Servier. Research Support; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Medicines Company. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, HLS Therapeutics, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medscape, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi, Servier. A. Sharma: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Roche Pharma. Research Support; Self; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. B. Zinman: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis. M. Mattheus: None. D.H. Fitchett: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Lilly Diabetes. Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. J.T. George: Employee; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. A. Ofstad: Employee; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. C. Wanner: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Mundipharma International. Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Sanofi Genzyme. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. S.E. Inzucchi: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Abbott, Merck & Co., Inc., vTv Therapeutics. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company Diabetes Alliance

28-OR: How Early after Treatment Initiation Are the CV Benefits of Empagliflozin Apparent? A Post Hoc Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME

Insulin resistance, a fundamental pathophysiological abnormality in patients with type 2 diabetes, is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) disease risk. In diabetes management, the macrovascular impact of antihyperglycemic agents that do not improve insulin sensitivity has generally been disappointing. In contrast, glucose-lowering drugs that work as insulin sensitizing agents have been postulated to reduce CV complications. The data to support this hypothesis have, however, been inconsistent. The impact of thiazolidinediones on macrovascular events is of particular interest. In this review, we discuss the results of trials reporting CV outcomes in patients treated with thiazolidinediones. We focus on the findings of the recent Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke trial that demonstrated a beneficial effect of pioglitazone on CV outcomes in stroke patients with insulin resistance. We discuss the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke results and its implications for clinical practice. We discuss the selective use of pioglitazone as secondary prevention to reduce CV risk in insulin resistant patients.

Pioglitazone and cardiovascular risk reduction: time for a second look?

/pdf/continuous-glucose-monitoring-1d4t2ktrrb.pdf

Silvio E. Inzucchi

Papers

Computing performance measures for inpatient glucose management.

The effect of dapagliflozin across the spectrum of baseline risk: a post-hoc analysis of DAPA-HF

28-OR: How Early after Treatment Initiation Are the CV Benefits of Empagliflozin Apparent? A Post Hoc Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME

Pioglitazone and cardiovascular risk reduction: time for a second look?

Continuous Glucose Monitoring