S
Stefano Carattini
Researcher at Georgia State University
Publications - 62
Citations - 1466
Stefano Carattini is an academic researcher from Georgia State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Carbon tax & Emissions trading. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 55 publications receiving 969 citations. Previous affiliations of Stefano Carattini include École Normale Supérieure & London School of Economics and Political Science.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations
Andrea Baranzini,Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh,Stefano Carattini,Richard B. Howarth,Emilio Padilla,Jordi Roca +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the main arguments for carbon pricing are presented to stimulate a fair and well-informed discussion about it, and the discussion goes beyond traditional arguments from environmental economics by including relevant insights from energy research and innovation studies as well.
Journal ArticleDOI
How to win public support for a global carbon tax
TL;DR: Survey shows charges on emissions could be popular if revenues are given back to citizens, and charges on carbon taxes may have to be reduced to attract public support.
Journal ArticleDOI
Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable?
Stefano Carattini,Stefano Carattini,Andrea Baranzini,Philippe Thalmann,Frédéric Varone,Frank Vöhringer +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, the acceptability of cost-effective climate policy in a real-voting setting was analyzed in a large ballot on energy taxes, rejected in Switzerland in 2015 by more than 2 million people.
Journal ArticleDOI
Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify drivers of and barriers to public support for carbon taxes, and, under the form of stylized facts, provide general lessons on the acceptability of carbon taxes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data
TL;DR: The authors analyzes the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data and a randomized labeling treatment and finds that the lack of perception of primary and ancillary benefits is one of the main barriers to the acceptance of carbon tax.