Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals

Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Beginning with Emlen (1966) and MacArthur and Pianka (1966) and extending through the last ten years, several authors have sought to predict the foraging behavior of animals by means of mathematical models. These models are very similar,in that they all assume that the fitness of a foraging animal is a function of the efficiency of foraging measured in terms of some "currency" (Schoener, 1971) -usually energy- and that natural selection has resulted in animals that forage so as to maximize this fitness. As a result of these similarities, the models have become known as "optimal foraging models"; and the theory that embodies them, "optimal foraging theory." The situations to which optimal foraging theory has been applied, with the exception of a few recent studies, can be divided into the following four categories: (1) choice by an animal of which food types to eat (i.e., optimal diet); (2) choice of which patch type to feed in (i.e., optimal patch choice); (3) optimal allocation of time to different patches; and (4) optimal patterns and speed of movements. In this review we discuss each of these categories separately, dealing with both the theoretical developments and the data that permit tests of the predictions. The review is selective in the sense that we emphasize studies that either develop testable predictions or that attempt to test predictions in a precise quantitative manner. We also discuss what we see to be some of the future developments in the area of optimal foraging theory and how this theory can be related to other areas of biology. Our general conclusion is that the simple models so far formulated are supported are supported reasonably well by available data and that we are optimistic about the value both now and in the future of optimal foraging theory. We argue, however, that these simple models will requre much modification, espicially to deal with situations that either cannot easily be put into one or another of the above four categories or entail currencies more complicated that just energy.

Citation classic - optimal foraging - a selective review of theory and tests

Analysis of habitat use based on radio-tagged animals presents difficulties inadequately addressed by current methods. Areas of concern are sampling level, data pooling across individuals, non-independence of habitat proportions, differential habitat use by groups of animals, and arbitrary definition of habitat availability. We advocate proportional habitat use by individual animals as a basis for analysis. Hypothesis testing of such nonstandard multivariate data is done by compositional analysis, which encom- passes all MANOVA/MANCOVA-type linear models. The applications to habitat use range from testing for age class effects or seasonal differences, to examining relationships with food abundance or home range size. We take as an example the comparison of habitat use and availability. The concepts are explained and demonstrated on two data sets, illustrating different methods of treating missing values. We compare utilized with available habitats in two stages, examining home range selection within the overall study area first, then habitat use within the home range. At each stage, assuming that use differs from random, habitats can be ranked according to relative use, and significant between-rank differences located. Compositional analysis is also suited to the analysis of time budgets or diets.

Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data

Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers

Ninety-three papers on home-range analysis using radio-tracking data were reviewed; these papers were found in a literature search of 18 of the major journals likely to include such papers, published in the 5-year period to the end of 1988. The review showed that even 25 years after the first radio-tracking studies, in the majority of papers there was still insufficient attention given to accurate and sufficient data collection, and to using appropriate and sophisticated analytical techniques to assess home-range size and configuration. This paper is designed to help people undertaking a radio-tracking study to avoid some of the most common pitfalls. It is based on some of the problems we have experienced studying several species of larger mammals. We use our collective experience to produce a guide on how to plan a radio-tracking study, to highlight some of the potential problems in designing the study and collecting the data, and to identify some of the difficulties that may be encountered during the analytical stages. The advantages and disadvantages of the most frequently used methods of home-range analysis are discussed and methods for determining the minimum number of radio-fixes and techniques for adjusting inadequate sample sizes are described, as are the problems that may be caused by autocorrelated data.

Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals

Symposia of the Zoological Society of London

A questionnaire survey of the numbers of animals brought home by domestic cats Felis catus was conducted between 1 April and 31 August 1997. A total of 14 370 prey items were brought home by 986 cats living in 618 households. Mammals made up 69% of the items, birds 24%, amphibians 4%, reptiles 1%, fish < 1%, invertebrates 1% and unidentified items 1%. A minimum of 44 species of wild bird, 20 species of wild mammal, four species of reptile and three species of amphibian were recorded. 2. Of a sample of 696 individual cats, 634 (91%) brought home at least one item and the back-transformed mean number of items brought home was 11.3 (95% CI 10.4-12.2). The back-transformed means and number of cats retrieving at least one item from each prey group were: 8.1 (7.4-8.9) mammals for 547 (79%) cats, 4.1 (3.8-4.5) birds for 506 (73%) cats, 2.6 (2.2-3.0) herpetofauna for 145 (21%) cats and 2.2 (1.8-2.7) other items for 98 (14%) cats. 3. The number of birds and herpetofauna brought home per cat was significantly lower in households that provided food for birds. The number of bird species brought home was greater in households providing bird food. The number of birds and herpetofauna brought home per cat was negatively related to the age and condition of the cat. The number of mammals brought home per cat was significantly lower when cats were equipped with bells and when they were kept indoors at night. The number of herpetofauna brought home was significantly greater when cats were kept in at night. 4. Based on the proportion of cats bringing home at least one prey item and the back- transformed means, a British population of approximately 9 million cats was estimated to have brought home in the order of 92 (85-100) million prey items in the period of this survey, including 57 (52-63) million mammals, 27 (25-29) million birds and 5 (4-6) million reptiles and amphibians. 5. An experimental approach should be taken to investigate the factors found by this descriptive survey to influence the numbers of prey brought home by cats. In particular, investigation of potential management practices that could reduce the numbers of wild animals killed and brought home by cats will be useful for wildlife conservation, particularly in suburban areas.

/pdf/predation-of-wildlife-by-domestic-cats-felis-catus-in-great-3g4mka4801.pdf

Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain

Street lighting disturbs commuting bats.

1. Bat foraging activity was quantified by using a broad-band acoustic method on transects in 10 land use types in south-west England. From multivariate analysis of parameters of bat echolocation calls, 83% of bat passes could be identified to species level with quantified degrees of certainty. The remaining 17% could be identified to species group. 2. Total bat activity was positively correlated with air temperature, and once adjusted for temperature, was significantly higher over rivers and lakes than over other land use types. 3. Bats that use frequency-modulated echolocation calls (mainly Myotis spp., but some Plecotus auritus) were recorded in nine of 10 land use types, but never in villages. Rivers and lakes supported high levels of activity of these species. Bats classified as 45 kHz and 55 kHz phonic types of Pipistrellus pipistrellus had different habitat requirements; 45 kHz P. pipistrellus fed in many habitats, while 55 kHz P. pipistrellus fed mainly over rivers and lakes. Bats classified as Nyctalus noctula, Nyctalus leisleri and Eptesicus serotinus were most active in open habitats and over rivers and lakes. 4. Total bat activity was equally high in woodland interiors and along woodland edges, but bats were relatively more active in sheltered sections of transects than in exposed sections. 5. Plans for land management should take into account the habitat needs of bats. For most bat species in Britain, rivers and lakes are of primary importance. Management plans should aim to maintain physical diversity and features used by insects in freshwater habitats, woodlands and pasture.

Stephen Harris

Papers

Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals

Symposia of the Zoological Society of London

Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain

Street lighting disturbs commuting bats.

Habitat use by bats (Chiroptera) assessed by means of a broad-band acoustic method