Evidence-based guidelines on the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are lacking. This guideline is a joint initiative of the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, United European Gastroenterology, European Pancreatic Club, European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, European Digestive Surgery, and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. It replaces the 2013 European consensus statement guidelines on PCN. European and non-European experts performed systematic reviews and used GRADE methodology to answer relevant clinical questions on nine topics (biomarkers, radiology, endoscopy, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), serous cystic neoplasm, rare cysts, (neo)adjuvant treatment, and pathology). Recommendations include conservative management, relative and absolute indications for surgery. A conservative approach is recommended for asymptomatic MCN and IPMN measuring 5 mm, and MPD diameter >10 mm. Lifelong follow-up of IPMN is recommended in patients who are fit for surgery. The European evidence-based guidelines on PCN aim to improve the diagnosis and management of PCN.

/pdf/european-evidence-based-guidelines-on-pancreatic-cystic-1wsge9ovyy.pdf

European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms

Pancreatic cancer, once invasive, is almost uniformly fatal. In order to alleviate the dismal prognosis associated with this disease, it is imperative that pancreatic cancer be recognized and treated prior to invasion. Understanding the morphology and biology of precursor lesions of invasive pancreatic cancer has therefore become an issue of paramount importance. In the last decade, significant progress has been in the recognition and appropriate classification of these precursor lesions, and the current review will focus on our state-of-the-art knowledge on this topic. Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) encompass the three known morphologically distinct precursors to invasive pancreatic cancer. In addition to discussion of the "classic" precursor entities, this review will also address some of the recent diagnostic controversies for these lesions, in particular features that distinguish IPMNs from PanIN lesions. Finally, the potential clinical impact of recognizing these precursor lesions in the context of early detection of pancreatic cancer will be discussed.

/pdf/precursors-to-invasive-pancreatic-cancer-y5pb5ap3om.pdf

Precursors to invasive pancreatic cancer

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare and aggressive primary hepatic malignancy with significant histological and biological heterogeneity. It presents with more aggressive behavior and worse survival outcomes than either hepatocellular carcinoma or CC and remains a diagnostic challenge. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for its optimal management. Major hepatectomy with hilar node resection remains the mainstay of treatment in operable cases. Advances in the genetic and molecular characterization of this tumor will contribute to the better understanding of its pathogenesis and shape its future management.

/pdf/combined-hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma-chcc-cc-an-update-10z9sy0dxg.pdf

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC): an update of genetics, molecular biology, and therapeutic interventions.

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: An update.

The sites of targeted therapy are limited and need to be expanded. The FGF-FGFR signalling plays pivotal roles in the oncogenic process, and FGF/FGFR inhibitors are a promising method to treat FGFR-altered tumours. The VEGF-VEGFR signalling is the most crucial pathway to induce angiogenesis, and inhibiting this cascade has already got success in treating tumours. While both their efficacy and antitumour spectrum are limited, combining FGF/FGFR inhibitors with VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors are an excellent way to optimize the curative effect and expand the antitumour range because their combination can target both tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment. In addition, biomarkers need to be developed to predict the efficacy, and combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors is a promising direction in the future. The article will discuss the FGF-FGFR signalling pathway, the VEGF-VEGFR signalling pathway, the rationale of combining these two signalling pathways and recent small-molecule FGFR/VEGFR inhibitors based on clinical trials.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cpr.13009

Inhibition of FGF-FGFR and VEGF-VEGFR signalling in cancer treatment

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. We enrolled 36 patients with pathologically proven, unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy. The log-rank test determined the significance of each prognostic factor. Elevated alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were observed in 58.3%, 16.7% and 38.9% of patients, respectively. First-line chemotherapy included platinum-containing regimens consisting of gemcitabine/cisplatin (n = 12) and fluorouracil/cisplatin (n = 11), sorafenib (n = 5) and others (n = 8). The median overall and progression-free survival times were 8.9 and 2.8 months, respectively, with an overall response rate of 5.6%. Prognostic factors associated with negative outcomes included poor performance status, no prior primary tumor resection, a Child-Pugh class of B, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels with a hazard ratio of 2.25, 2.48, 3.25 and 2.84 by univariate analysis, respectively. The median overall survival times of the gemcitabine/cisplatin, fluorouracil/cisplatin, sorafenib and other groups were 11.9, 10.2, 3.5 and 8.1 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the overall survival of patients within the sorafenib monotherapy group was poor compared with platinum-containing regimens (HR: 15.83 [95% CI: 2.25-111.43], P = .006). All 7 patients in the sorafenib group had progressive disease, including 2 patients with second-line therapy. In conclusion, the platinum-containing regimens such as gemcitabine/cisplatin were associated with more favorable outcomes than sorafenib monotherapy for unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cas.13656

Multicenter retrospective analysis of systemic chemotherapy for unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma

Objectives The standard chemotherapy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas (IDC) is gemcitabine; however, the efficacy of gemcitabine in invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with an associated invasive carcinoma of the pancreas (IPMN-IC) is still unknown. Methods Because it is difficult to distinguish between IPMN-IC and IDC based only on radiological findings in advanced unresectable cases, recurrent cases after surgical resection were analyzed to identify the efficacy of gemcitabine monotherapy for IPMN-IC. Results Between 1992 and 2010, 128 patients with IPMN-IC and 548 patients with IDC underwent pancreatic resection at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Twelve patients with IPMN-IC and 73 patients with IDC had recurred after surgery and subsequently underwent gemcitabine at the standard dosage. The disease-control rates were comparable between the IPMN-IC and IDC patients (58.3% vs 59.4%). The median progression-free survival was 2.8 and 4.1 months in the IPMN-IC and IDC patients, respectively (P = 0.46). Also, no statistically significant difference in the median survival times was observed between the 2 groups (9.3 vs 8.8 months, respectively; P = 0.09). Conclusions Among patients who had IPMN-IC and IDC with recurrent disease after resection, there was no significant difference in treatment outcomes after gemcitabine.

Gemcitabine in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with an associated invasive carcinoma of the pancreas.

This phase I, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics of nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and mild/moderate liver impairment. Thirty patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled to groups, depending on whether liver impairment was mild (group I, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase ≤2× upper limit of normal and Child-Pugh score 5 [n = 14] or 6 [n = 2]) or moderate (group II, Child-Pugh score 5-6 and aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase >2× to ≤5× upper limit of normal [n = 7] or Child-Pugh score 7 [n = 7]); 22 patients had prior sorafenib treatment. Nintedanib was given twice daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events, starting at 150 mg (group I) or 100 mg (group II) and escalating to 200 mg. The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose based on occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1 (grade ≥3 non-hematological and grade 4 hematological adverse events). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported during cycle 1 and the maximum tolerated dose for both groups was 200 mg twice daily. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite). No patients discontinued nintedanib due to adverse events; 31% of group I and 21% of group II had dose reductions. Median time to progression was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval, 1.05-5.52) for group I and 3.2 months (95% confidence interval, 0.95-6.70) for group II. Nintedanib showed a manageable safety profile and efficacy signals, including in patients previously treated with sorafenib. Clinical trial registration NCT01594125; 1199.120 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cas.13077

Taiga Otsuka

Papers

Multicenter retrospective analysis of systemic chemotherapy for unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma

Gemcitabine in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with an associated invasive carcinoma of the pancreas.

Phase I study of nintedanib in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and liver impairment