Showing papers by "Thorgeir E. Thorgeirsson published in 2003"

Anxiety with Panic Disorder Linked to Chromosome 9q in Iceland

Abstract: The results of a genomewide scan for genes conferring susceptibility to anxiety disorders in the Icelandic population are described. The aim of the study was to locate genes that predispose to anxiety by utilizing the extensive genealogical records and the relative homogeneity of the Icelandic population. Participants were recruited in two stages: (1) Initial case-identification by a population screening for anxiety disorders, using the Stamm Screening Questionnaire, was followed by aggregation into extended families, with the help of our genealogy database; and (2) those who fulfilled the diagnostic and family aggregation criteria underwent a more detailed diagnostic workup based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Screening for anxiety in close relatives also identified additional affected members within the families. After genotyping was performed with 976 microsatellite markers, affected-only linkage analysis was done, and allele-sharing LOD scores were calculated using the program Allegro. Linkage analysis of 25 extended families, in each of which at least one affected individual had panic disorder (PD), resulted in a LOD score of 4.18 at D9S271, on chromosome 9q31. The intermarker distance was 4.4 cM on average, whereas it was 1.5 cM in the linked region as additional markers were added to increase the information content. The linkage results may be relevant not only to PD but also to anxiety in general, since our linkage study included patients with other forms of anxiety.

Neuregulin 1 in schizophrenia: out of Iceland.

Abstract: Schizophrenia is a disease that has proven difficult for scientists to crack. It is characterized by alterations in the content of consciousness and in spite of the fact that we know much more about the function of the brain today than we did a few years back, we know precious little about how it works as an organ of consciousness. Schizophrenia is a disease without a clear anatomic lesion or a known causative agent. It has, however, a genetic component; there is an inherited predisposition to the development of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a disease that highlights the advantages of the human genetics approach to the study of human disease: we know little about the basic function that is perturbed by the disease and it affects an organ that is difficult to biopsy. Therefore, it has proven difficult to advance our understanding of the disease by putting together hypotheses that are subsequently tested. The genetics approach, however, is model independent and allows for the isolation of a disease gene independent of preconceived notions about its pathogenesis. Once you have the gene in hand you can put the protein it encodes, into the context of biological pathways that are already known or use it as a tag for a new pathway. In either case, this defines a key pathway that leads to an understanding of how the disease happens or provides an excellent position from which to construct a hypothesis on the topic. The human genetics approach to common diseases has been difficult, and until recently, it has proven hard to isolate genes that contribute to the pathogenesis of common diseases; schizophrenia has been no exception to that. However, recent publications have reported the isolation of three schizophrenia canditate genes: the dysbindin gene, the gene encoding G72, and the Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene. It is of interest here that all the three may play a part in the glutamatergic system. Stefánsson et al described the isolation of a candidate for a schizophrenia gene from a locus on chromosome 8p22–p11 that has shown up in several genomewide scans for schizophrenia genes. The gene encodes members of the neuregulin family of proteins, NRG1, that may influence both synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity and in that invites the possibility that the gene may hold, in part, not only the secret to the genetic predisposition to schizophrenia, but also the mechanism whereby the environment contributes to the pathogenesis of the disease. The environment influences the brain in many ways, and the one that is most specific to the brain is through the experience of the beholder; one of the ways in which the brain responds to experience is through synaptic remodeling that may be influenced by NRG1. Therefore, the NRG1 gene may shed light on how both nature and nurture contribute to the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. How conclusive is the evidence supporting a role for the NRG1 gene in schizophrenia? The original report by Stefansson et al 5 was based on work done with the Icelandic population that showed highly significant association between a seven-marker haplotype covering the 50 end of the NRG1 gene and schizophrenia, but it did not describe a causative mutation in spite of a substantial effort to find one. The haplotype confers a relative risk of about 2. A second report by Stefansson et al 11 described a significant association between schizophrenia and the same alleles of the seven-marker haplotype that tracks schizophrenia in Iceland in a cohort of schizophrenics from Scotland, conferring a similar relative risk; still no pathogenic mutation was described. Two articles in Molecular Psychiatry report replications of NRG1 association with schizophrenia, one by Williams et al working with a group of Caucasians born in the UK or Ireland (published in the May issue) and the other by Yang et al with Chinese Hans (published in this issue). Williams et al report a significant association to schizophrenia of a three-marker core haplotype covering a region at the 50end of the gene described by Stefansson et al; it confers a smaller relative risk in their population, but the actual relative risks must await discovery of the mutation underlying the haplotypes. Yang et al 13 describe both, significant association of each of three SNPs within the NRG1 gene to schizophrenia, and the association of a haplotype consisting of the three SNPs. This haplotype reaches much deeper into the gene than the haplotype described by Stefánsson et al, or all the way into the fifth intron. These two reports constitute additional evidence in support of a role for NRG1 in conferring susceptibility to schizophrenia. It is not difficult to live with the fact that the markers and the haplotypes that display the strongest association to the disease are not exactly the same in all populations; it is not unexpected that mutations in different populations are to be found on the background of different haplotypes. Furthermore, it is also possible that there is a diversity of mutations in the NRG1 gene that are responsible for schizophrenia. One concern that is frequently raised when a disease gene is mapped or isolated in a small, relatively homogeneous population is that the gene may not be relevant to the disease in question among the larger and more heterogeneous nations. This assumes that the pathogenesis of the disease would be different in small populations than in large ones. Molecular Psychiatry (2003) 8, 639–640 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1359-4184/03 $25.00