Part One: Initial Considerations Chapter 1: Motivation in Organizations Mitchell, Terence R., and Daniels, Denise. Observation and Commentary on Recent Research in Work Motivation. Chapter 2: Conceptual Approaches to Motivation at Work Ryan, Richard M., and Deci, Edward L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1): 68-78. Mowday, Richard, and Colwell, Kenneth A. Employee reactions to unfair outcomes in the workplace: The contributions of Adams' equity theory to understanding work motivation. Cropanzano, Russell, and Rupp, Deborah. An overview of organizational justice: Implications for work motivation. Komaki, Judith. Reinforcement theory at work: Enhancing and explaining what employees do. Locke, Edwin A. 1996. Motivation through conscious goal setting. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5: 117-124. Stajkovic, Alexander D., and Luthans, Fred. Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Implications for motivation theory and practice. Part Two: Central Issues in Motivation at Work Chapter 3: The Role of Cognitions, Beliefs, and Attitudes in Motivation Staw, Barry M. 1986. Organizational psychology and the pursuit of the happy/productive worker. California Management Review, 28(4): 40-53. Rousseau, Denise M., and Tijoriwala, Snehal A. 1999. What's a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in promoting organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4): 514-528. Luthans, Fred. Positive Organizational Behavior: Implications for Leadership and HR Development and Motivation. Chapter 4: The Role of Goals and Intentions in Motivation Klein, Howard J., Wesson, Michael J., Hollenbeck, John R., and Alge, Bradley J. 1999. Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6: 885-896. O'Leary-Kelly, Anne M., Martocchio, Joseph J., and Frink, Dwight D. 1994. A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5): 1285-1301. Crown, Deborah F., and Rosse, Joseph G. 1995. Yours, mine, and ours: Facilitating group productivity through the integration of individual and group goals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2): 138-150. Chapter 5: The Role of Affect in Motivation Raghunathan, Rajagopal, and Pham, Michel T. 1999. All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1): 56-77. Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Speier, Cheri. 1999. Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1): 1-28. Chapter 6: The Role of Social Influences in Motivation Porter, Lyman W., Lawler, Edward E. III, and Hackman, J. Richard. 1975. Ways groups influence individual effectiveness. (Holdover from previous edition) Vardi, Yoav and Wiener, Yoash. 1996. Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organization Science, 7(2): 151-165. Whyte, Glen. 1998. Recasting Janis's groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2/3): 185-209. Chapter 7: The Role of Cross-Cultural Influences in Work Motivation Hofstede, G. 1993. Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1): 81-94. Sanchez-Runde, Carlos J., and Steers, Richard M. Cultural influences on work motivation and performance. Frese, Michael, Kring, Wolfgang, Soos, Andrea, Zempel, Jeannette. 1996. Personal initiative at work: Differences between east and west Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 37-63. Meek, Christopher B. 1999. Ganbatte: Understanding the Japanese employee. Business Horizons, January-February, 27-36. Chapter 8: The Role of Individual Differences in Motivation O'Reilly, Charles A. III and Chatman, Jennifer A. 1994. Working smarter and harder: A longitudinal study of managerial success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 603-627. Pilegge, Anthony J. and Holtz, Rolf. 1997. The effects of social identity on the self-set goals and task performance of high and low self-esteem individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1): 17-26. Part Three: Applications of Motivational Approaches Chapter 9: Rewards Lawler, Edward L. 1987. The design of effective reward systems. In J. W. Lorsch (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp, 25-271. Kerr, Steven. 1995. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1): 7-14. Pearce, Jone L. 1987. Why merit pay doesn't work: Implications from organizational theory. In D. B. Balkin and L. R. Gomez-Mejia (eds.), New Perspectives on Compensation, pp. 169-178. Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1998. Six dangerous myths about pay. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 109-119. Duncan, W. Jack. 2001. Stock ownership and work motivation. Organizational Dynamics, 30(1): 1-11. Chapter 10: Punishment George, Jennifer M. 1995. Asymmetrical effects of rewards and punishments: the case of social loafing. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68: 327-338. Butterfield, Kenneth D., Trevino, Linda K., and Ball, Gail A. 1996. Punishment from the manager's perspective: A grounded investigation and inductive model. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 1479-1512. Chapter 11: Motivating Creativity aand Innovation Amabile, Teresa. 1997. Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1): 39-58. Cummings, Anne and Oldham, Greg R. 1997. Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40(1): 22-38.

Motivatiom and work behaviour

Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital

– Turnover intention is one's behavioural intention to quit. The purpose of this study is to compare the relative influences of organizational socialization and career aspirations on turnover intentions of design engineers and to address the design of more effective development programmes and the reduction of dysfunctional turnover., – A study of 442 engineers staffed within “design and development” units is presented, and a research model is tested using structural equation modelling techniques., – The analysis indicates that design engineers report lower levels of turnover intention when organizational socialization is prominent and an adequate range of opportunities that satisfy career aspirations exist within the organization., – The cause‐effect relationships among constructs that are empirically derived from the analysis should be further supported by a longitudinal study. Future research should be aimed at exploring the different patterns of turnover intentions of engineers with different career orientations and in organizations with or without rigid formalized career advancement system., – Managers of technical staff are advised to put an effort to develop and encourage lateral career moves of research and development staff members, particularly for newcomers, by offering a variety of experiences, that is likely to speed up their prompt creation of a better defined self‐concept., – The originality of the research lies in that it addresses an explanation of engineers’ turnover based on a theoretical framework that jointly combines internal career anchors as well as external career opportunities and socialization, thus striving to fill a gap in existing literature.

Organizational socialization, career aspirations and turnover intentions among design engineers

Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university

The steady growth of R&D costs and the increasingly widespread dissemination of information and communication technology over the past decade have resulted in the affirmation of the paradigm of open innovation, which consists in the continual expansion of access to sources of technological innovation outside the firm itself. Industrial companies are, in fact, turning more frequently to collaboration with university departments and other public and private research centers, and there is a notable increase in agreements regarding technological cooperation and the exchange of know-how between companies. In addition, recourse to highly specialized small research companies is on the rise. This is common, for example in the pharmaceutical sector and, more generally, in the area of biotechnological research. Furthermore, we are witnessing the development of the new role of innovation broker. These factors alter the traditional profile of company R&D structures, within which the role of researchers and technologi...

Open innovation and new issues in R&D organization and personnel management

Strategic career development for R&D professionals: Lessons from field research

HRM in transitie: via het 'toegevoegde-waarde-denken' naar Human Investment Strategie

Competencies and service organizations

HRM in transitie

Various authors suggest that with reference to the organisation of labour a new era has come (Bridges, 1994; Gamst, 1995; Halcrow, 1997; Handy, 1995 Lefever and Broecks, 1997). In the past organisations could only deal with variations in demand using technical unemployment and temporary employment. Nowadays, organisations have a lot more flexibility to deal with these fluctuations. As the environment is getting more complex and changes are occuring more rapidly, organisations are faced with the issue of how to cope effectively with those changes and in which manner personnel management can stimulate flexibility. Flexibility can take so many shapes. Talking about flexibility is talking about atypical working arrangements, which means labour that is different from labour based on an employment contract for an indefinite period of time, full time, in the day-time, and on the usual working days. It seems that the traditional employment contract or the traditional full-time, long-term job in which the employee has to work a fixed amount of days a week or a fixed amount of hours a day a month, doing a well-defined job for an indefinite period of time, is under review again. Hence, it is being argued that flexible working practices could make organisations more versatile. Flexibility is regarded as one of the most important tools in the tough worldwide competition.

Tine Vandenbossche

Papers

Strategic career development for R&D professionals: Lessons from field research

HRM in transitie: via het 'toegevoegde-waarde-denken' naar Human Investment Strategie

Competencies and service organizations

HRM in transitie

Flexibility in Profile: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data of 394 Belgian Companies