Rho GTPases are molecular switches that control a wide variety of signal transduction pathways in all eukaryotic cells. They are known principally for their pivotal role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton, but their ability to influence cell polarity, microtubule dynamics, membrane transport pathways and transcription factor activity is probably just as significant. Underlying this biological complexity is a simple biochemical idea, namely that by switching on a single GTPase, several distinct signalling pathways can be coordinately activated. With spatial and temporal activation of multiple switches factored in, it is not surprising to find Rho GTPases having such a prominent role in eukaryotic cell biology.

Rho GTPases in cell biology.

Rho GTPases are molecular switches that regulate many essential cellular processes, including actin dynamics, gene transcription, cell-cycle progression and cell adhesion. About 30 potential effector proteins have been identified that interact with members of the Rho family, but it is still unclear which of these are responsible for the diverse biological effects of Rho GTPases. This review will discuss how Rho GTPases physically interact with, and regulate the activity of, multiple effector proteins and how specific effector proteins contribute to cellular responses. To date most progress has been made in the cytoskeleton field, and several biochemical links have now been established between GTPases and the assembly of filamentous actin. The main focus of this review will be Rho, Rac and Cdc42, the three best characterized mammalian Rho GTPases, though the genetic analysis of Rho GTPases in lower eukaryotes is making increasingly important contributions to this field.

Rho GTPases and their effector proteins.

https://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~alorch/jc/Lee04.pdf

Distinct roles for Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA silencing pathways.

Rho GTPases control many aspects of cell behavior through the regulation of multiple signal transduction pathways (Van Aelst and D’Souza-Schorey 1997; Hall 1998). Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 were first recognized in the early 1990s for their unique ability to induce specific filamentous actin structures in fibroblasts; stress fibers, lamellipodia/membrane ruffles, and filopodia, respectively (Hall 1998). Over the intervening years, evidence has accumulated to show that in all eukaryotic cells, Rho GTPases are involved in most, if not all, actin-dependent processes such as those involved in migration, adhesion, morphogenesis, axon guidance, and phagocytosis (Kaibuchi et al. 1999; Chimini and Chavrier 2000; Luo 2000). In addition to their well-established roles in controlling the actin cytoskeleton, Rho GTPases regulate the microtubule cytoskeleton, cell polarity, gene expression, cell cycle progression, and membrane transport pathways (Van Aelst and D’Souza-Schorey 1997; Daub et al. 2001; Etienne-Manneville and Hall 2001). With such a prominent role in so many aspects of cell biology, it is not surprising that they are themselves highly regulated. Like all GTPases, Rho proteins act as binary switches by cycling between an inactive (GDP-bound) and an active (GTP-bound) conformational state (Fig. 1; Van Aelst and D’Souza-Schorey 1997). The cell controls this switch by regulating the interconversion and accessibility of these two forms in a variety of ways. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) stimulate the exchange of GDP for GTP to generate the activated form, which is then capable of recognizing downstream targets, or effector proteins. GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of Rho family members to inactivate the switch. Finally, guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) interact with the prenylated, GDP-bound form to control cycling between membranes and cytosol. In theory, activation of a Rho GTPase could occur through stimulation of a GEF or inhibition of a GAP. In practice, however, all the evidence points to GEFs being the critical mediators of Rho GTPase activation, and this paper reviews our present understanding of how they do this. Structural features

/pdf/guanine-nucleotide-exchange-factors-for-rho-gtpases-turning-7l5hsifukr.pdf

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rho GTPases: turning on the switch

Genetic intervention in the fly Drosophila melanogaster has provided strong evidence that the mushroom bodies of the insect brain act as the seat of a memory trace for odours. This localization gives the mushroom bodies a place in a network model of olfactory memory that is based on the functional anatomy of the olfactory system. In the model, complex odour mixtures are assumed to be represented by activated sets of intrinsic mushroom body neurons. Conditioning renders an extrinsic mushroom-body output neuron specifically responsive to such a set. Mushroom bodies have a second, less understood function in the organization of the motor output. The development of a circuit model that also addresses this function might allow the mushroom bodies to throw light on the basic operating principles of the brain.

http://www.ini.uzh.ch/~pfmjv/InsectCognition/nat+rev+neurosci_4_266.mb-review.pdf

Mushroom body memoir: From maps to models

Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis.

The mushroom bodies (MBs) are prominent structures in the Drosophila brain that are essential for olfactory learning and memory. Characterization of the development and projection patterns of individual MB neurons will be important for elucidating their functions. Using mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (Lee, T. and Luo, L. (1999) Neuron 22, 451-461), we have positively marked the axons and dendrites of multicellular and single-cell mushroom body clones at specific developmental stages. Systematic clonal analysis demonstrates that a single mushroom body neuroblast sequentially generates at least three types of morphologically distinct neurons. Neurons projecting into the (gamma) lobe of the adult MB are born first, prior to the mid-3rd instar larval stage. Neurons projecting into the alpha' and beta' lobes are born between the mid-3rd instar larval stage and puparium formation. Finally, neurons projecting into the alpha and beta lobes are born after puparium formation. Visualization of individual MB neurons has also revealed how different neurons acquire their characteristic axon projections. During the larval stage, axons of all MB neurons bifurcate into both the dorsal and medial lobes. Shortly after puparium formation, larval MB neurons are selectively pruned according to birthdays. Degeneration of axon branches makes early-born gamma neurons retain only their main processes in the peduncle, which then project into the adult gamma lobe without bifurcation. In contrast, the basic axon projections of the later-born (alpha'/beta') larval neurons are preserved during metamorphosis. This study illustrates the cellular organization of mushroom bodies and the development of different MB neurons at the single cell level. It allows for future studies on the molecular mechanisms of mushroom body development.

Development of the Drosophila mushroom bodies: sequential generation of three distinct types of neurons from a neuroblast

http://web.stanford.edu/group/luolab/Pdfs/Lee_et_al_Neuron_2000b.pdf

Essential Roles of Drosophila RhoA in the Regulation of Neuroblast Proliferation and Dendritic but Not Axonal Morphogenesis

http://web.stanford.edu/group/luolab/Pdfs/Lee_et_al_Neuron_2000a.pdf

Cell-Autonomous Requirement of the USP/EcR-B Ecdysone Receptor for Mushroom Body Neuronal Remodeling in Drosophila

The small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac regulate a variety of biological processes, including actin polymerization, cell proliferation, and JNK/mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, conceivably via distinct effectors. Whereas the effector for mitogen-activated protein kinase activation appears to be p65PAK, the identity of effector(s) for actin polymerization remains unclear. We have found a putative effector for Drosophila Cdc42, Genghis Khan (Gek), which binds to Dcdc42 in a GTP-dependent and effector domain-dependent manner. Gek contains a predicted serine/threonine kinase catalytic domain that is 63% identical to human myotonic dystrophy protein kinase and has protein kinase activities. It also possesses a large coiled-coil domain, a putative phorbol ester binding domain, a pleckstrin homology domain, and a Cdc42 binding consensus sequence that is required for its binding to Dcdc42. To study the in vivo function of gek, we generated mutations in the Drosophila gek locus. Egg chambers homozygous for gek mutations exhibit abnormal accumulation of F-actin and are defective in producing fertilized eggs. These phenotypes can be rescued by a wild-type gek transgene. Our results suggest that this multidomain protein kinase is an effector for the regulation of actin polymerization by Cdc42.

Tzumin Lee

Papers

Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis.

Development of the Drosophila mushroom bodies: sequential generation of three distinct types of neurons from a neuroblast

Essential Roles of Drosophila RhoA in the Regulation of Neuroblast Proliferation and Dendritic but Not Axonal Morphogenesis

Cell-Autonomous Requirement of the USP/EcR-B Ecdysone Receptor for Mushroom Body Neuronal Remodeling in Drosophila

Genghis Khan (Gek) as a putative effector for Drosophila Cdc42 and regulator of actin polymerization.