scispace - formally typeset
V

Victor A. F. Lamme

Researcher at University of Amsterdam

Publications -  167
Citations -  19411

Victor A. F. Lamme is an academic researcher from University of Amsterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Visual cortex & Visual perception. The author has an hindex of 60, co-authored 164 publications receiving 17948 citations. Previous affiliations of Victor A. F. Lamme include Massachusetts Institute of Technology & Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing.

TL;DR: An analysis of response latencies shows that when an image is presented to the visual system, neuronal activity is rapidly routed to a large number of visual areas, but the activity of cortical neurons is not determined by this feedforward sweep alone.
Journal ArticleDOI

The neurophysiology of figure^ground segregation in primary visual cortex

TL;DR: The results show that context modulation within primary visual cortex has a highly sophisticated nature, putting the image features the cells are responding to into their fully evaluated perceptual context.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why visual attention and awareness are different

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present definitions of visual attention and awareness that clearly distinguish between the two, yet explain why attention and attention are so intricately related, and why there seems more overlap between mechanisms of memory and awareness than between those of attention.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied extra-receptive field contextual modulation in area V1 of awake, behaving macaque monkeys and found that contextual modulation correlated with perceptual experience of both binocularly rivalrous texture displays and of displays with a simple example of surface occlusion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a true neural stance on consciousness

TL;DR: It is argued that introspective or behavioral observations are considered the gold standard, to which neural measures should be fitted, and that this poses serious problems for understanding the mind-brain relationship.