Privileged substructures are of potentially great importance in medicinal chemistry. These scaffolds are characterized by their ability to promiscuously bind to a multitude of receptors through a variety of favorable characteristics. This may include presentation of their substituents in a spatially defined manner and perhaps also the ability to directly bind to the receptor itself, as well as exhibiting promising characteristics to aid bioavailability of the overall molecule. It is believed that some privileged substructures achieve this through the mimicry of common protein surface elements that are responsible for binding, such as β- and gamma;-turns. As a result, these structures represent a promising means by which new lead compounds may be identified.

The combinatorial synthesis of bicyclic privileged structures or privileged substructures

One of the initial steps in the development of therapeutic agents is the identification of lead compounds that bind to the receptor or enzyme target of interest. Many analogs of these lead compounds are then synthesized to define the key recognition elements for maximal activity. In general, many compounds must be evaluated in both the lead identification and optimization steps. Increasing burdens have been placed on these efforts due to the large number of new therapeutic targets that continue to be identified thorough modern molecular biology methods.1 To address this demand, very powerful chemical and biological methods have been developed for the generation of large combinatorial libraries of peptides2 and oligonucleotides3 that are then screened against a receptor or enzyme to identify high-affinity ligands or potent inhibitors, respectively. While these studies have clearly demonstrated the power of library synthesis and screening strategies, peptides and oligonucleotides generally have poor oral activities and rapid in vivo clearance;4 therefore their utility as bioavailable therapeutic agents is often limited. Due to the favorable pharmacokinetic properties of many small organic molecules (<600-700 molecular weight),5 the design, synthesis, and evaluation of libraries of these compounds6 has rapidly become a major frontier in organic chemistry. Lorin A. Thompson was born in Lexington, KY, in 1970. He received the Bachelor of Science degree from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, in 1992 where he worked under the guidance of Joseph Desimone. He is currently pursuing his doctorate in the laboratory of Jonathan Ellman at UC Berkeley where he is the 1994 Glaxo-Wellcome fellow. His research interests include the development of synthetic methodology for organic library construction.

/pdf/synthesis-and-applications-of-small-molecule-libraries-3n3gol8dyk.pdf

Synthesis and Applications of Small Molecule Libraries.

1. Peptoids 419 2. Oligocarbamates 420 3. Oligoureas 420 4. Vinylogous Sulfonyl Peptides 420 5. Peptidosulfonamides 420 6. Azatides 420 7. Ketides 420 D. Small Molecule Libraries 420 1. Acyclic Libraries 422 2. Libraries on Preformed Scaffolds 422 3. Heterocyclic Libraries 423 4. Structurally Heterogeneous Libraries 427 E. Cleavable Linkers 428 1. Single Cleavable Linkers 428 2. Multiply Cleavable Linkers 429 IV. Screening Methods 432 A. On-Bead Screening 432 1. Binding Assay 432 2. Functional Assay 434 B. Solution-Phase Screening 434 1. The 96-Well Two-Stage Releasable Assays 435

/pdf/the-one-bead-one-compound-combinatorial-library-method-10r4u9b736.pdf

The “One-Bead-One-Compound” Combinatorial Library Method

The Current Status of Heterocyclic Combinatorial Libraries.

A method is presented for the preparation and use of fluorogenic peptide substrates that allows for the configuration of general substrate libraries to rapidly identify the primary and extended specificity of proteases. The substrates contain the fluorogenic leaving group 7-amino-4-carbamoylmethylcoumarin (ACC). Substrates incorporating the ACC leaving group show kinetic profiles comparable to those with the traditionally used 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) leaving group. The bifunctional nature of ACC allows for the efficient production of single substrates and substrate libraries by using 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc)-based solid-phase synthesis techniques. The approximately 3-fold-increased quantum yield of ACC over AMC permits reduction in enzyme and substrate concentrations. As a consequence, a greater number of substrates can be tolerated in a single assay, thus enabling an increase in the diversity space of the library. Soluble positional protease substrate libraries of 137,180 and 6,859 members, possessing amino acid diversity at the P4-P3-P2-P1 and P4-P3-P2 positions, respectively, were constructed. Employing this screening method, we profiled the substrate specificities of a diverse array of proteases, including the serine proteases thrombin, plasmin, factor Xa, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, tissue plasminogen activator, granzyme B, trypsin, chymotrypsin, human neutrophil elastase, and the cysteine proteases papain and cruzain. The resulting profiles create a pharmacophoric portrayal of the proteases to aid in the design of selective substrates and potent inhibitors.

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/97/14/7754.full.pdf

Rapid and general profiling of protease specificity by using combinatorial fluorogenic substrate libraries

In the solid phase preparation of synthetic peptide libraries, equimolarity of the resultant peptides in the mixture simplifies the identification of active compounds. Two primary methods for the preparation of combinatorial peptide mixtures are currently used. In the first method, the starting resin is divided into equal aliquots, individual amino acids are coupled to each aliquot, and the resin is then recombined. This process is repeated for each position. However, due to the physical process, each resin bead contains only one peptide sequence. Statistically, for mixtures of longer sequences, an ever-increasing amount of resin is necessary to ensure complete representation of each peptide in the library. Thus, each peptide will be represented in the library if a sufficient number of resin beads are used. In addition, the concentration of each peptide in the library depends on both the number of mixture positions in the library and the amount of resin used. In the second method, mixtures of amino acids are coupled simultaneously at each addition step. The proportion of each amino acid in the reaction mixture is varied inversely to its reaction rate such that, ideally, an equimolar mixture of each peptide is synthesized. An advantage of this method over the previous method is that each peptide is ensured to be represented in the library, although not necessarily in equimolar amounts. It is known that not only do the coupling rates of each amino acid vary, but the coupling rates of individual amino acids also change when coupled to different amino acid resins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vince T. Hamashin

Papers

Peptide libraries: determination of relative reaction rates of protected amino acids in competitive couplings.

Solid-phase synthesis of trisubstituted bicyclic guanidines via cyclization of reduced N-acylated dipeptides

Solid phase synthesis of styrylquinazolinones

Peptides as precursors in the synthesis of heterocyclic positional scanning combinatorial libraries

Synthesis of cyclic ureas and cyclic thioureas from acyl dipeptides