scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Vivian G. Cheung published in 2016"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A pause in early elongation is identified, specific to S. pombe, that requires the conserved elongation factor subunit Spt4 and resembles promoter-proximal pausing in metazoans, and is the first base-pair resolution map of transcription elongation in S.pombe.
Abstract: Complex regulation of gene expression in mammals has evolved from simpler eukaryotic systems, yet the mechanistic features of this evolution remain elusive. Here, we compared the transcriptional landscapes of the distantly related budding and fission yeast. We adapted the Precision Run-On sequencing (PRO-seq) approach to map the positions of RNA polymerase active sites genome-wide in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Additionally, we mapped preferred sites of transcription initiation in each organism using PRO-cap. Unexpectedly, we identify a pause in early elongation, specific to S. pombe, that requires the conserved elongation factor subunit Spt4 and resembles promoter-proximal pausing in metazoans. PRO-seq profiles in strains lacking Spt4 reveal globally elevated levels of transcribing RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) within genes in both species. Messenger RNA abundance, however, does not reflect the increases in Pol II density, indicating a global reduction in elongation rate. Together, our results provide the first base-pair resolution map of transcription elongation in S. pombe and identify divergent roles for Spt4 in controlling elongation in budding and fission yeast.

75 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that Saccharomyces cerevisiae has all 12 types of RNA-DNA sequence differences (RDDs) in the mRNA and it is shown these sequence differences are propagated to proteins, as it is identified peptides encoded by the RNA sequences in addition to those by the DNA sequences at RDD sites.
Abstract: Alterations of RNA sequences and structures, such as those from editing and alternative splicing, result in two or more RNA transcripts from a DNA template. It was thought that in yeast, RNA editing only occurs in tRNAs. Here, we found that Saccharomyces cerevisiae have all 12 types of RNA-DNA sequence differences (RDDs) in the mRNA. We showed these sequence differences are propagated to proteins, as we identified peptides encoded by the RNA sequences in addition to those by the DNA sequences at RDD sites. RDDs are significantly enriched at regions with R-loops. A screen of yeast mutants showed that RDD formation is affected by mutations in genes regulating R-loops. Loss-of-function mutations in ribonuclease H, senataxin, and topoisomerase I that resolve RNA-DNA hybrids lead to increases in RDD frequency. Our results demonstrate that RDD is a conserved process that diversifies transcriptomes and proteomes and provide a mechanistic link between R-loops and RDDs.

12 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study characterized additional recombination phenotypes to uncover novel candidates and identified several new candidate loci, particularly for recombination events outside of hotspots, and identified regulatory variants influencing the numbers and locations of recombination Events.
Abstract: Meiotic recombination is an essential step in gametogenesis, and is one that also generates genetic diversity. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and molecular studies have identified genes that influence of human meiotic recombination. RNF212 is associated with total or average number of recombination events, and PRDM9 is associated with the locations of hotspots, or sequences where crossing over appears to cluster. In addition, a common inversion on chromosome 17 is strongly associated with recombination. Other genes have been identified by GWAS, but those results have not been replicated. In this study, using new datasets, we characterized additional recombination phenotypes to uncover novel candidates and further dissect the role of already known loci. We used three datasets totaling 1562 two-generation families, including 3108 parents with 4304 children. We estimated five different recombination phenotypes including two novel phenotypes (average recombination counts within recombination hotspots and outside of hotspots) using dense SNP array genotype data. We then performed gender-specific and combined-sex genome-wide association studies (GWAS) meta-analyses. We replicated associations for several previously reported recombination genes, including RNF212 and PRDM9 . By looking specifically at recombination events outside of hotspots, we showed for the first time that PRDM9 has different effects in males and females. We identified several new candidate loci, particularly for recombination events outside of hotspots. These include regions near the genes SPINK6 , EVC2 , ARHGAP25 , and DLGAP2 . This study expands our understanding of human meiotic recombination by characterizing additional features that vary across individuals, and identifying regulatory variants influencing the numbers and locations of recombination events.

10 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors would like to correct these panels and the text referring to them on pages 800–801 (“Results,” first subsection, second paragraph), which should read as follows: a moderate sequence preference for initiating at an A/G, immediately downstream from a C/T, was revealed under the observed TSS, whereas no base preferences underlie the PomBase annotations for the same genes.
Abstract: Genome Research 26: 799–811 (2016) Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure S1C in the above article displayed incorrect sequence logos based on the observed TSS. Observed positions on the plus strand were shifted by one base, causing a misalignment of underlying sequences. The authors would like to correct these panels and the text referring to them on pages 800–801 (“Results,” first subsection, second paragraph), which should read as follows: “Moreover, a moderate sequence preference for initiating at an A/G, immediately downstream from a C/T, was revealed under the observed TSS, whereas no base preferences underlie the PomBase annotations for the same genes (Fig. 1C).” Figure 1. The corrected Figure 1 is provided on the next page. Supplemental Tables S2 and S3 have also been corrected to remove this shift. The authors thank Craig Kaplan for bringing this to their attention, and apologize for any confusion this may have caused. The article has already been corrected in both the PDF and full-text HTML files online. doi: 10.1101/gr.210161.116

3 citations