W
William O. Bearden
Researcher at University of South Carolina
Publications - 127
Citations - 17910
William O. Bearden is an academic researcher from University of South Carolina. The author has contributed to research in topics: Product (category theory) & Consumer behaviour. The author has an hindex of 51, co-authored 127 publications receiving 16794 citations.
Papers
More filters
Book
Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey on dimensionality, reliability, and validity of Latent Constructs in the context of scale development in the social sciences, focusing on the dimensionality of construct, items, and a set of items.
Journal ArticleDOI
Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conduct a meta-analysis that aggregates empirical findings from the market orientation literature and find that market orientation-performance relationship is stronger in samples of manufacturing firms, in low power-distance and uncertainty-avoidance cultures, and in studies that use subjective measures of performance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports
William O. Bearden,Jesse E. Teel +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the antecedents and consequences of consume consumption of automobile repairs and services were examined using data obtained from 375 members of a consumer panel in a two-phase study of consumer experiences with automobile repairs.
Book
Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a survey of consumer attitudes about the performance of business Firms, Satisfaction and post-purchase behavior, social agencies, and the Marketplace.
Journal ArticleDOI
The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the assessment of face validity in consumer-related scale development research is reported, suggesting that concerns over the lack of consistency and guidance regarding item retention during the expert judging phase of scale development are warranted.