scispace - formally typeset
W

William O. Bearden

Researcher at University of South Carolina

Publications -  127
Citations -  17910

William O. Bearden is an academic researcher from University of South Carolina. The author has contributed to research in topics: Product (category theory) & Consumer behaviour. The author has an hindex of 51, co-authored 127 publications receiving 16794 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book

Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey on dimensionality, reliability, and validity of Latent Constructs in the context of scale development in the social sciences, focusing on the dimensionality of construct, items, and a set of items.
Journal ArticleDOI

Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conduct a meta-analysis that aggregates empirical findings from the market orientation literature and find that market orientation-performance relationship is stronger in samples of manufacturing firms, in low power-distance and uncertainty-avoidance cultures, and in studies that use subjective measures of performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports

TL;DR: In this article, the antecedents and consequences of consume consumption of automobile repairs and services were examined using data obtained from 375 members of a consumer panel in a two-phase study of consumer experiences with automobile repairs.
Book

Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a survey of consumer attitudes about the performance of business Firms, Satisfaction and post-purchase behavior, social agencies, and the Marketplace.
Journal ArticleDOI

The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs

TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the assessment of face validity in consumer-related scale development research is reported, suggesting that concerns over the lack of consistency and guidance regarding item retention during the expert judging phase of scale development are warranted.