scispace - formally typeset
W

William T. Hoyt

Researcher at University of Wisconsin-Madison

Publications -  73
Citations -  5715

William T. Hoyt is an academic researcher from University of Wisconsin-Madison. The author has contributed to research in topics: Forgiveness & Counseling psychology. The author has an hindex of 32, co-authored 69 publications receiving 5076 citations. Previous affiliations of William T. Hoyt include Virginia Commonwealth University & Iowa State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Religious Involvement and Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review

TL;DR: Although the strength of the religious involvement-mortality association varied as a function of several moderator variables, the association of religious involvement and mortality was robust and on the order of magnitude that has come to be expected for psychosocial factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mindfulness Interventions with Youth: A Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: The first published meta-analysis of the burgeoning literature on mindfulness meditation with youth (conducted between 2004 and 2011) identifies specific outcomes and sub-populations for whom mindfulness may be particularly helpful as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Promoting self-regulation through school-based martial arts training

TL;DR: In this paper, the impact of school-based Tae kwon do training on self-regulatory abilities was examined and a self-regulation framework including three domains (cognitive, affective, and physical) was presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Transgression-Related Motivational Dispositions: Personality Substrates of Forgiveness and their Links to the Big Five:

TL;DR: The authors used generalizability analysis to evaluate the contribution of individual differences to people's transgression-related interpersonal motivations (TRIMs) and found that individual differences accounted for 22% to 44% of the variance in participants' TRIMs (i.e., avoidance, benevolence, and revenge).
Journal ArticleDOI

Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it?

TL;DR: In this article, a model based on multivariate generalizability theory is proposed to identify four types of bias that may affect findings in research using observer ratings, including the biases traditionally termed leniency and halo errors.