scispace - formally typeset
Y

Yan Chen

Researcher at University of Auckland

Publications -  41
Citations -  638

Yan Chen is an academic researcher from University of Auckland. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Thematic analysis. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 26 publications receiving 399 citations. Previous affiliations of Yan Chen include University of Otago.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Depression in medical students: current insights.

TL;DR: It is concluded that medical schools need wide-ranging strategies to address the complexities associated with the particular student population attracted to medicine and calls for educators to act, by noticing opportunities where they can introduce such initiatives into their medical programs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Telling the Tale and Living Well: Adolescent Narrative Identity, Personality Traits, and Well-Being Across Cultures.

TL;DR: Links between narrative identity, personality traits, and well-being for 263 adolescents from three New Zealand cultures: Māori, Chinese, and European are explored and cultural similarities and differences are considered.
Journal ArticleDOI

The coherence of critical event narratives and adolescents' psychological functioning.

TL;DR: Why coherent life-event narratives may not be linked to benefits for younger adolescents and for boys, and how low- and high-point life events both contribute to identity construction are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Making robust assessments of specialist trainees' workplace performance.

TL;DR: Using an entrustability scale, where supervisors scored trainees on the level of supervision required, mini-CEX scores demonstrated moderate reliability within a feasible number of assessments, and evidence of validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Progress testing in the medical curriculum: students' approaches to learning and perceived stress.

TL;DR: Comparing the impact of PTs on undergraduate medical students’ approaches to learning and perceived stress with that of traditional high-stakes assessments found no significant differences between the two groups in approach to learning at either time point, and no significant changes in approaches tolearning over time in either cohort.