Showing papers by "Yeong-Shiau Pu published in 1996"
TL;DR: It appeared that mdr-1 expression status did not correlate with the response to chemotherapy in either systemic or intravesical models, and was not commonly seen in TCC cell lines but can be significantly induced by chronic exposure to doxorubicin.
24 citations
TL;DR: Tamoxifen enhanced the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents largely through its toxic effects on the bladder cancer cells, and the mode of action of tamoxIFen was not through the regulation of TGF beta-1 or the function of mdr-1, indicating that the primary chemoresistance mechanisms of the two cell lines were not mediated by mDR-1.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether tamoxifen enhances the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents on bladder cancer cells, and the possible mechanism(s) of action. MATERIALS AND METHODS The in vitro inhibition of cell growth was examined in a model simulating intravesical chemotherapy using two bladder cancer cell lines (TSGH-8301, HTB9) and three commonly used intravesical cytotoxic agents (doxorubicin, mitomycin C, and thiotepa) in the presence or absence of tamoxifen or verapamil as modulators. The expression of the multi-drug resistance-related gene mdr-1 was evaluated by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and Southern blotting (RT-PCR-SB) to determine its transcript level, by flow cytometric analysis of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) product level with C-219 monoclonal antibody and by the rhodamine-123 retention and efflux assay for P-gp activity. Transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF beta-1) levels in tamoxifen-conditioned culture medium were determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). RESULTS Tamoxifen at concentrations > or = 30 microM significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of the three chemotherapeutic agents to both cell lines, as shown by a marked reduction in the drug concentration which inhibited growth by 50% (IC50). The enhancement of cytotoxicity was significantly dependent on the concentration of tamoxifen. However, tamoxifen alone caused significant toxic effects to TSGH-8301 at > or = 40 microM and to HTB9 at > or = 30 microM. Median-effect analysis showed additive or less-than-additive combination effects between tamoxifen and chemotherapeutic agents and only a minimal synergism in a narrow range of maximal cytotoxicity (fraction affected > 0.9). Thus, the reduction of IC50s by tamoxifen was mostly because it was cytotoxic to the bladder cancer cells used. No enhancement of cytotoxicity was observed in verapamil-modulated cells. Transcripts of mdr-1 could not be detected by RT-PCR-SB, nor was P-gp detected by flow cytometric analysis in the two cell lines. Furthermore, no active P-gp function was detected by the rhodamine-123 retention and efflux study, indicating that the primary chemoresistance mechanisms of the two cell lines were not mediated by mdr-1, nor could tamoxifen or verapamil act through modulation of the mdr-1 pathway in the two cell lines. Tamoxifen at 3 and 10 microM down-regulated the secretion of TGF beta-1 from TSGH-8301 in a concentration-dependent manner, in contrast to the findings that tamoxifen was cytotoxic to the bladder cancer cells used and that tamoxifen up-regulated TGF beta-1 in a breast cancer model, suggesting that there may be a different mechanism of response to TGF beta-1 in these bladder cancer cells. CONCLUSION Tamoxifen enhanced the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents largely through its toxic effects on the bladder cancer cells. The mode of action of tamoxifen was not through the regulation of TGF beta-1 or the function of mdr-1. Although cytotoxic levels of tamoxifen (> 50 microM) can be achieved easily in the intravesical model, further study is necessary before tamoxifen can be used clinically in intravesical chemotherapy.
23 citations