scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Yoshiyuki Iida published in 2015"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: TPF followed by CRT is tolerated and may be an option for the treatment of locally advanced stage N2c, N3, or N2b HNSCC.
Abstract: We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with a high risk of distant metastases compared with CRT alone. We retrospectively analyzed 29 HNSCC patients with clinical nodal stage N2c, N3, or N2b disease and supraclavicular lymph node metastases receiving CRT alone (CRT group; n = 16) or TPF induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (TPF group; n = 13) between April 2008 and May 2012. The median follow-up periods were 14.5 (range 5.0–65.0) and 25.0 (range 14.0–32.0) months for CRT and TPF groups, respectively. A greater proportion of patient characteristics in the CRT group had advanced T and N stages. The overall response rate to induction TPF was 50.0 %; grade 3–4 toxicities included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anorexia, and hyponatremia. Complete response rates after CRT completion were 55.5 % in the TPF and 42.9 % in the CRT group; median overall survival was not reached in the TPF group and was 14.0 months in the CRT group (p = 0.037). Multivariate analysis revealed that induction TPF and T stage were independent prognostic factors [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.196; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.043–0.898; p = 0.036, HR = 9.966; 95 % CI 2.270–43.75; p = 0.002, respectively). TPF followed by CRT is tolerated and may be an option for the treatment of locally advanced stage N2c, N3, or N2b HNSCC.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is recommended because most patients receiving cetuximab and radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma have Grade ≥ 3 mucositis with distinctive features.
Abstract: Objective Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy may be considered before chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, because severe mucositis is a common complication. We evaluated the mucosal findings and necessity of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving cetuximab and radiotherapy. Methods Fourteen consecutive patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving cetuximab and radiotherapy were analyzed. Results Patients' backgrounds were as follows: male/female, 8/6; median age, 64.5 years (range, 35-83 years); performance status, 0/1, 9/5. Primary tumor sites included the oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx in four, seven and three patients, respectively. Patients completed a median of eight cetuximab cycles. All patients received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (median dose, 70 Gy). Thirteen patients were treated with elective neck irradiation at the ipsilateral (n = 3) or bilateral (n = 10) nodes. Grade ≥ 3 mucositis/stomatitis (clinical examination) occurred in 85.7% patients (n = 12). The median irradiation dose was 33 Gy at the Grade 3 mucositis onset. Eight patients showed mucositis with distinctive features, a wide range of white-coated lesions with a clear border; hypopharyngeal atresia was observed in two patients. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was performed in 11 patients, and 11 patients (78.6%) actually required nutritional support because of Grade ≥ 3 mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic). Conclusions Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is recommended because most patients receiving cetuximab and radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma have Grade ≥ 3 mucositis with distinctive features.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Concurrent carboplatin plus radiotherapy is tolerated and may be an option in treating locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck patients ineligible for treatment with cisplatin.
Abstract: Objective Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, patients with advanced age, renal, cardiac or neurogenic dysfunction seem ineligible for cisplatin treatment. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of concurrent carboplatin plus radiotherapy in patients ineligible for cisplatin usage. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of 25 consecutive locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck patients who received concurrent carboplatin plus radiotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center between August 2006 and March 2014. Carboplatin was administered tri-weekly or weekly. Results Patient characteristics were analyzed. The median age was 75 years (range, 54-82), male:female ratio, 24:1; performance status, 0-1 (23) or 2 (2); primary tumor site, oropharynx (10), hypopharynx (12), larynx (1) or oral cavity (2); Stage III (3), IVa (19) or IVb (3); induction chemotherapy, with (2) or without (23); and a median creatinine clearance of 62 ml/min (range, 37-117). The main reasons for choosing carboplatin were age (40%), renal impairment (36%) and cardiac dysfunction (20%). All patients received a planned irradiation dose of 70 Gy. Median follow-up was 30.9 months. Complete response was observed 70% patients. Median progression-free survival duration was 42.7 months. Median overall survival could not be analyzed. The 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 68 and 74%, respectively. The main toxicity Grade 3 or 4 was oral mucositis (56%), thrombocytopenia (34%), neutropenia (28%) and infection (24%). Conclusions Concurrent carboplatin plus radiotherapy is tolerated and may be an option in treating locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck patients ineligible for treatment with cisplatin.

10 citations