Abstract Community paramedic roles are expanding internationally, and no review of the literature could be found to guide services in the formation of community paramedicine programmes. For this reason, the aim of this restricted review was to explore and better understand the successes and learnings of community paramedic programmes across five domains being; education requirements, models of delivery, clinical governance and supervision, scope of roles and outcomes. This restricted review was conducted by searching four databases (CENTRAL, ERIC, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar) as well as grey literature search from 2001 until 28/12/2021. After screening, 98 articles were included in the narrative synthesis. Most studies were from the USA (n = 37), followed by Canada (n = 29). Most studies reported on outcomes of community paramedicine programmes (n = 50), followed by models of delivery (n = 28). The findings of this review demonstrate a lack of research and understanding in the areas of education and scope of the role for community paramedics. The findings highlight a need to develop common approaches to education and scope of role while maintaining flexibility in addressing community needs. There was an observable lack of standardisation in the implementation of governance and supervision models, which may prevent community paramedicine from realising its full potential. The outcome measures reported show that there is evidence to support the implementation of community paramedicine into healthcare system design. Community paramedicine programmes result in a net reduction in acute healthcare utilisation, appear to be economically viable and result in positive patient outcomes with high patient satisfaction with care. There is a developing pool of evidence to many aspects of community paramedicine programmes. However, at this time, gaps in the literature prevent a definitive recommendation on the impact of community paramedicine programmes on healthcare system functionality.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/hsc.13985

The development of community paramedicine; a restricted review

Priority areas for emergency care research are emerging and becoming ever more important. The objectives of this scoping review were to (1) provide a comprehensive overview of published emergency care priority‐setting studies by collating and comparing priority‐setting methodology and (2) describe the resulting research priorities identified.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/emp2.12852

Research priority setting in emergency care: A scoping review

Improving Hospice and Palliative Care Through Nurse Practitioner Engagement in a Community Paramedicine Program

Evaluating Social Determinants of Health in a Mobile Integrated Healthcare-Community Paramedicine Program

This study aimed to investigate whether mobile health (mHealth)-based transitional care, which utilized WeChat, could benefit patients undergoing hepatectomy. From January 2019 to December 2020, 807 patients who underwent hepatectomy in a tertiary care hospital were included in the study. Patients were divided into a transitional care group (TC group) (n = 238) and a control group (n = 569) based on whether they participated in mHealth-based transitional care, which utilized the WeChat application. Depending on the type of variables, t-tests, χ2 tests, and other statistical methods were used to compare differences between groups. Propensity score matching analysis was conducted for factors that differed in basic characteristics. After 1:1 matching, 238 patients were included in each group. Less readmission within 90 days of discharge, better quality of life, and higher satisfaction were found in the TC group both before and after matching (p < .05). This study showed the potential of applying mHealth-based transitional care among post-hepatectomy patients.

Application of WeChat-Utilized Mobile Health in Transitional Care Among Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE To measure the effect of a mobile integrated health community paramedicine (MIH-CP) transitional care program on hospital utilization, emergency department visits, and charges. DATA SOURCES Retrospective secondary data from the electronic health record and regional health information exchange were used to analyze patients discharged from a large academic medical center and an affiliated community hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, May 2018-October 2019. STUDY DESIGN We performed an observational study comparing patients enrolled in an MIH-CP program to propensity-matched controls. Propensity scores were calculated using measures of demographics, clinical characteristics, social determinants of health, and prior health care utilization. The primary outcome is inpatient readmission within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes include excess days in acute care 30 days after discharge and emergency department visits, observation hospitalizations, and total health care charges within 30 and 60 days of discharge. DATA COLLECTION Included patients were over 18 years old, discharged to home from internal/family medicine services, and live in eligible ZIP codes. The intervention group was enrolled in the MIH-CP program; controls met inclusion criteria but were not enrolled during the study period. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The adjusted model showed no difference in 30-day inpatient readmission between 464 enrolled patients and propensity-matched controls (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.89, 1.60]). There was a higher rate of observation hospitalizations within 30 days of index discharge for MIH-CP patients (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.78, 95% CI = [1.01, 3.14]). This difference did not persist at 60 days, and there were no differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We found no significant difference in short-term health care utilization or charges between patients enrolled in an MIH-CP transitional care program and propensity-matched controls. This highlights the importance of well-controlled, robust evaluations of effectiveness in novel care-delivery systems.

The effect of a mobile integrated health program on health care cost and utilization.

Background Emergency medical services (EMS) diversion strategies attempt to limit the impact of low-acuity care on emergency department (ED) crowding, but evidence supporting these strategies is scarce. Objective This study aims to measure the effect of a treat-in-place and alternative destination program on ED transports and EMS utilization. Methods We used a natural experiment study design to measure effects of a pilot prehospital diversion program on ED transport, number of EMS vehicles dispatched, and EMS time on task for low-acuity emergency calls in a midsized urban setting characterized by a high prevalence of health disparities, concentrated poverty, and limited access to primary care between October 2018 and January 2020. We also used direct variable cost to estimate the return on investment attributable to avoided ED visits. Results Of 3725 calls that met eligibility criteria, the program responded to 1084 (29.1%), with 56.7% of those resulting in an ED visit, compared with 64.6% of the 492 control calls that were eligible but were dispatched when program services were unavailable. Of 1084 calls receiving response, 213 (19.6%) were enrolled in the program, and 8.5% of those were transported by EMS to the ED. Adjusted results show EMS time on task was 23.4 min less for enrolled calls vs. controls. The program can achieve a positive return on investment by enrolling 2.9 patients/day. Conclusions A prehospital diversion program reduced ED visits and EMS transport times. Improved targeting of patients for enrollment would further increase the intervention’s efficacy and cost savings.

Yuanyuan Liang

Papers

The effect of a mobile integrated health program on health care cost and utilization.

Analysis of an Alternative Model of Definitive Care For Low-Acuity Emergency Calls: A Natural Experiment.