Summary Background After brain metastasis resection, whole brain radiotherapy decreases local recurrence, but might cause cognitive decline. We did this study to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved time to local recurrence compared with that for surgical resection alone. Methods In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients at a single tertiary cancer centre in the USA. Eligible patients were older than 3 years, had a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70 or higher, were able to have an MRI scan, and had a complete resection of one to three brain metastases (with a maximum diameter of the resection cavity ≤4 cm). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four to either SRS of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery) or observation. Patients were stratified by histology of the primary tumour, metastatic tumour size, and number of metastases. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence in the resection cavity, assessed by blinded central review of brain MRI scans by the study neuroradiologist in the modified intention-to-treat population that analysed patients by randomised allocation but excluded patients found ineligible after randomisation. Participants and other members of the treatment team (excluding the neuroradiologist) were not masked to treatment allocation. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00950001, and is closed to new participants. Findings Between Aug 13, 2009, and Feb 16, 2016, 132 patients were randomly assigned to the observation group (n=68) or SRS group (n=64), with 128 patients available for analysis; four patients were ineligible (three from the SRS group and one from the observation group). Median follow-up was 11·1 months (IQR 4·8–20·4). 12-month freedom from local recurrence was 43% (95% CI 31–59) in the observation group and 72% (60–87) in the SRS group (hazard ratio 0·46 [95% CI 0·24–0·88]; p=0·015). There were no adverse events or treatment-related deaths in either group. Interpretation SRS of the surgical cavity in patients who have had complete resection of one, two, or three brain metastases significantly lowers local recurrence compared with that noted for observation alone. Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection could be an alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy. Funding National Institutes of Health.

Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

Combining immunotherapy and BRAF targeted therapy may result in improved antitumor activity with the high response rates of targeted therapy and the durability of responses with immunotherapy. However, the first clinical trial testing the combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and the CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab was terminated early because of substantial liver toxicities. MEK [MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) kinase] inhibitors can potentiate the MAPK inhibition in BRAF mutant cells while potentially alleviating the unwanted paradoxical MAPK activation in BRAF wild-type cells that lead to side effects when using BRAF inhibitors alone. However, there is the concern of MEK inhibitors being detrimental to T cell functionality. Using a mouse model of syngeneic BRAF(V600E)-driven melanoma, SM1, we tested whether addition of the MEK inhibitor trametinib would enhance the antitumor activity of combined immunotherapy with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. Combination of dabrafenib and trametinib with pmel-1 adoptive cell transfer (ACT) showed complete tumor regression, increased T cell infiltration into tumors, and improved in vivo cytotoxicity. Single-agent dabrafenib increased tumor-associated macrophages and T regulatory cells (Tregs) in tumors, which decreased with the addition of trametinib. The triple combination therapy resulted in increased melanosomal antigen and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression and global immune-related gene up-regulation. Given the up-regulation of PD-L1 seen with dabrafenib and/or trametinib combined with antigen-specific ACT, we tested the combination of dabrafenib, trametinib, and anti-PD1 therapy in SM1 tumors, and observed superior antitumor effect. Our findings support the testing of triple combination therapy of BRAF and MEK inhibitors with immunotherapy in patients with BRAF(V600E) mutant metastatic melanoma.

Improved antitumor activity of immunotherapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E) melanoma.

During the past decades, anticancer immunotherapy has evolved from a promising therapeutic option to a robust clinical reality. Many immunotherapeutic regimens are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for use in cancer patients, and many others are being investigated as standalone therapeutic interventions or combined with conventional treatments in clinical studies. Immunotherapies may be subdivided into "passive" and "active" based on their ability to engage the host immune system against cancer. Since the anticancer activity of most passive immunotherapeutics (including tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies) also relies on the host immune system, this classification does not properly reflect the complexity of the drug-host-tumor interaction. Alternatively, anticancer immunotherapeutics can be classified according to their antigen specificity. While some immunotherapies specifically target one (or a few) defined tumor-associated antigen(s), others operate in a relatively non-specific manner and boost natural or therapy-elicited anticancer immune responses of unknown and often broad specificity. Here, we propose a critical, integrated classification of anticancer immunotherapies and discuss the clinical relevance of these approaches.

/pdf/classification-of-current-anticancer-immunotherapies-3bquq660nx.pdf

Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies

Rationale:More than 25 million individuals have heart failure worldwide, with ≈4000 patients currently awaiting heart transplantation in the United States. Donor organ shortage and allograft rejection remain major limitations with only ≈2500 hearts transplanted each year. As a theoretical alternative to allotransplantation, patient-derived bioartificial myocardium could provide functional support and ultimately impact the treatment of heart failure. Objective:The objective of this study is to translate previous work to human scale and clinically relevant cells for the bioengineering of functional myocardial tissue based on the combination of human cardiac matrix and human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes. Methods and Results:To provide a clinically relevant tissue scaffold, we translated perfusion-decellularization to human scale and obtained biocompatible human acellular cardiac scaffolds with preserved extracellular matrix composition, architecture, and perfusable coronary vasculatur...

/pdf/bioengineering-human-myocardium-on-native-extracellular-434mij24ax.pdf

Bioengineering Human Myocardium on Native Extracellular Matrix

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine involve many different artificial and biologic materials, frequently integrated in composite scaffolds, which can be repopulated with various cell types. One of the most promising scaffolds is decellularized allogeneic extracellular matrix (ECM) then recellularized by autologous or stem cells, in order to develop fully personalized clinical approaches. Decellularization protocols have to efficiently remove immunogenic cellular materials, maintaining the nonimmunogenic ECM, which is endowed with specific inductive/differentiating actions due to its architecture and bioactive factors. In the present paper, we review the available literature about the development of grafts from decellularized human tissues/organs. Human tissues may be obtained not only from surgery but also from cadavers, suggesting possible development of Human Tissue BioBanks from body donation programs. Many human tissues/organs have been decellularized for tissue engineering purposes, such as cartilage, bone, skeletal muscle, tendons, adipose tissue, heart, vessels, lung, dental pulp, intestine, liver, pancreas, kidney, gonads, uterus, childbirth products, cornea, and peripheral nerves. In vitro recellularizations have been reported with various cell types and procedures (seeding, injection, and perfusion). Conversely, studies about in vivo behaviour are poorly represented. Actually, the future challenge will be the development of human grafts to be implanted fully restored in all their structural/functional aspects.

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/12/4117/pdf

Tissue-Engineered Grafts from Human Decellularized Extracellular Matrices: A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

There has been significant progress in the field of heart transplantation over the last 45 years. The 1-yr survival rates following heart transplantation have improved from 30% in the 1970s to almost 90% in the 2000s. However, there has been little change in long-term outcomes. This is mainly due to chronic rejection, malignancy, and the detrimental side effects of chronic immunosuppression. In addition, over the last decade, new challenges have arisen such as increasingly complicated recipients and antibody-mediated rejection. Most, if not all, of these obstacles to long-term survival could be prevented or ameliorated by the induction of transplant tolerance wherein the recipient's immune system is persuaded not to mount a damaging immune response against donor antigens, thus eliminating the need for chronic immunosuppression. However, the heart, as opposed to other allografts like kidneys, appears to be a tolerance-resistant organ. Understanding why organs like kidneys and livers are prone to tolerance induction, whereas others like hearts and lungs are tolerance-resistant, could aid in our attempts to achieve long-term, immunosuppression-free survival in human heart transplant recipients. It could also advance the field of pig-to-human xenotransplantation, which, if successful, would eliminate the organ shortage problem. Of course, there are alternative futures to the field of heart transplantation that may include the application of total mechanical support, stem cells, or bioengineered whole organs. Which modality will be the first to reach the ultimate goal of achieving unlimited, long-term, circulatory support with minimal risk to longevity or lifestyle is unknown, but significant progress in being made in each of these areas.

/pdf/heart-transplantation-challenges-facing-the-field-3n80vpclc9.pdf

Heart Transplantation: Challenges Facing the Field

The combination of BRAF-targeted agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors represents a recent advance in the treatment of melanoma, even though each of these therapeutic approaches alone has specific limitations. Increasing evidence suggests indeed the existence of a synergistic interaction between these therapeutic modalities.

Combining checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeted agents against metastatic melanoma.

SUMMARY Despite therapeutic advances in management, the prognosis of patients with brain metastasis remains dismal. Treatment options include surgical resection, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Patients who undergo surgical resection typically receive WBRT as adjuvant therapy. However, several studies have demonstrated an association between WBRT and neurotoxicity. Thus, clinicians are increasingly delaying WBRT in favor of postoperative use of SRS. In this review, we will discuss the current literature exploring the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative SRS in the treatment of patients with resected brain metastasis.

/pdf/postoperative-stereotactic-radiosurgery-for-resected-brain-1bq09z7e60.pdf

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for resected brain metastasis.

Identification of novel Plasmodium falciparum dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors for malaria using in silico studies

There have been two major advances in the treatment of metastatic melanoma within the past several years, including immunotherapy and BRAF-directed therapy. Both of these classes of therapy demonstrate survival benefit, but also have limitations as monotherapy with regard to overall response rate and/or durability of response. We have gained significant insight into mechanisms of response to BRAF-directed therapy and to potential synergy between these two treatment modalities. This chapter focuses on the limitations of each of these strategies as monotherapy, and provides the rationale for combining these therapies. Importantly, ongoing clinical trials of combined BRAF-directed therapy and immunotherapy are discussed, as well as considerations and future directions for therapy.

Zain Ahmed

Papers

Heart Transplantation: Challenges Facing the Field

Combining checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeted agents against metastatic melanoma.

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for resected brain metastasis.

Identification of novel Plasmodium falciparum dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors for malaria using in silico studies

Combination BRAF-Directed Therapy and Immunotherapy