2.3. Evaluation of Photocatalytic Water Splitting 6507 2.3.1. Photocatalytic Activity 6507 2.3.2. Photocatalytic Stability 6507 3. UV-Active Photocatalysts for Water Splitting 6507 3.1. d0 Metal Oxide Photocatalyts 6507 3.1.1. Ti-, Zr-Based Oxides 6507 3.1.2. Nb-, Ta-Based Oxides 6514 3.1.3. W-, Mo-Based Oxides 6517 3.1.4. Other d0 Metal Oxides 6518 3.2. d10 Metal Oxide Photocatalyts 6518 3.3. f0 Metal Oxide Photocatalysts 6518 3.4. Nonoxide Photocatalysts 6518 4. Approaches to Modifying the Electronic Band Structure for Visible-Light Harvesting 6519

Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation

https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/638974.pdf

Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: A review

Low cost adsorbents for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater.

Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water. A review

Remediation of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical residues based on electrochemical separation and degradation technologies: a review.

Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic properties of ATaO3ATaO3 and ANbO3ANbO3 (A=NaA=Na and K)

Enhancing anaerobic digestion and methane production of tetracycline wastewater in EGSB reactor with GAC/NZVI mediator.

Response of anaerobic granular sludge to iron oxide nanoparticles and multi-wall carbon nanotubes during beet sugar industrial wastewater treatment

The occurrence and removal of eight endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs), including estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), diethylstilbestrol (DES), bisphenol A (BPA), nonylphenol (NP) and octylphenol (OP), and their estrogenicities were investigated in a sewage treatment plant in Harbin city, China. The EDCs were extracted from wastewater samples by solid phase extraction (SPE) method and analyzed with gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The average concentrations in the influents and effluents ranged from 6.3 (EE2) to 1725.8 ng L−1 (NP) and from <LOD (EE2) to 368.5 ng L−1 (NP), respectively. The mean removal efficiencies were in the range of 16.9 (DES) to 94.4% (E3). 6.4–46.1% of EDCs were removed during the primary treatment, and the adsorption on solid particles was assumed as the dominant removal mechanism. The removal efficiencies in anoxic and aerobic biological treatment units ranged from −30.2% to 62.2% and from −8.3% to 83%. The yeast estrogen screen (YES) was used to analyze the estrogenicity of the test samples. The EEQ in the influents and effluents were in the range of 21.7–54.7 ng L−1 and 3.5–29.6 ng L−1, respectively. The overall EEQ removal efficiencies were in the range of 15.6–92.8%, and the biological treatment was crucial to EEQ removal. The total estrogenicity increased after primary treatment which might be owing to the deconjugating of estrogen compounds by microbial activity. The EEQ value based on chemical substrates calculation was larger than the results of the YES assay, with a ratio value of 3.94 ± 4.00 in all water samples.

Zhaohan Zhang

Papers

Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic properties of ATaO3ATaO3 and ANbO3ANbO3 (A=NaA=Na and K)

Enhancing anaerobic digestion and methane production of tetracycline wastewater in EGSB reactor with GAC/NZVI mediator.

Response of anaerobic granular sludge to iron oxide nanoparticles and multi-wall carbon nanotubes during beet sugar industrial wastewater treatment

Occurrence and removal efficiencies of eight EDCs and estrogenicity in a STP

Bidirectional electron transfer biofilm assisted complete bioelectrochemical denitrification process