Example of Mycological Progress format
Recent searches

Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format Example of Mycological Progress format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Mycological Progress — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) #14 of 85 -
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #133 of 647 up up by 35 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 386 Published Papers | 1614 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 02/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.8
SJR: 1.574
SNIP: 2.128
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.6
SJR: 0.699
SNIP: 1.629
open access Open Access

Hindawi

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.429
SNIP: 1.331
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

PLOS

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 2.628
SNIP: 1.713

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.149

7% from 2018

Impact factor for Mycological Progress from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.149
2018 2.0
2017 1.914
2016 1.616
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.2

2% from 2019

CiteRatio for Mycological Progress from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.2
2019 4.1
2018 3.6
2017 3.5
2016 3.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 7% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.282

7% from 2019

SJR for Mycological Progress from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.282
2019 1.197
2018 0.869
2017 1.219
2016 0.858
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.142

22% from 2019

SNIP for Mycological Progress from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.142
2019 0.939
2018 0.912
2017 1.044
2016 0.908
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 22% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Mycological Progress

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Mycological Progress

Mycological Progress publishes papers on all aspects of fungi, including lichens. While Review Papers are highly welcome, the main focus is on Research Articles on • Taxonomy and Systematics • Evolution • Cell Biology • Ecology • Biotechnology • Pathology (plants, animals, hum...... Read More

Plant Science

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
02 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1861-8952
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.899
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11557-006-0505-X
Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae
Reinhard Agerer1
01 Jun 2006 - Mycological Progress

Abstract:

Aproximately 5,000–6,000 fungal species form ectomyorrhizae (ECM), the symbiotic organs with roots of predominantly trees. The contributing fungi are not evenly distributed over the system of fungi. Within Basidiomycota exclusively Hymenomycetes and within Ascomycota exclusively Ascomycetes contribute to the symbiosis. Hymeno... Aproximately 5,000–6,000 fungal species form ectomyorrhizae (ECM), the symbiotic organs with roots of predominantly trees. The contributing fungi are not evenly distributed over the system of fungi. Within Basidiomycota exclusively Hymenomycetes and within Ascomycota exclusively Ascomycetes contribute to the symbiosis. Hymenomycetes play a big part, Ascomycetes a minor role; Zygomycetes only form exceptionally ECM. Responsible for ascomycetous ECM are mostly Pezizales with their hypogeous derivatives, whereas Boletales, Gomphales, Thelephorales, Amanitaceae, Cantharellaceae, Cortinariaceae, Russulaceae, and Tricholomataceae are the most important ectomycorrhizal relationships within Hymenomycetes. ECM, as transmitting organs between soil and roots, are transporting carbohydrates for growth of mycelium and fruitbodies from roots and have to satisfy the tree’s demand for water and nutrients. The latter task particularly influences the structure of ECM as nutrients are patchily distributed in the soil and saprotrophic as well as ectomycorrhizal fungi can act as strong competitors for nutrients. In focusing these requirements, ECM developed variously structured hyphal sheaths around the roots, the so-called mantles, and differently organized mycelium that emanates from the mantle, the so-called extramatrical mycelium. The mantles can be plectenchymatous consisting of loosely woven, differently arranged hyphae or they are densely packed, forming a pseudoparenchyma similar to the epidermis of leaves. The extramatrical mycelium grows either as simple scattered hyphae from the mantle into the soil or it can be united to undifferentiated rhizomorphs with a small reach or to highly organized root-like organs with vessel-like hyphae for efficient water and nutrient transport from distances of decimeters. Cystidia, sterile and variously shaped hyphal ends, possibly appropriate for preventing animal attack, in addition, can cover mantles and rhizomorphs. Although only a limited number of species could be considered, some general conclusions are possible. read more read less

Topics:

Mycelial cord (57%)57% related to the paper, Mycelium (56%)56% related to the paper, Hypha (53%)53% related to the paper
341 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11557-006-0053-4
Endophytes and mycoparasites associated with an indigenous forest tree, Theobroma gileri , in Ecuador and a preliminary assessment of their potential as biocontrol agents of cocoa diseases
Harry C. Evans1, K. A. Holmes1, Sarah E. Thomas1
CABI1
01 May 2003 - Mycological Progress

Abstract:

The main constraint and continuing threat to cocoa production in Latin America is disease caused by two basidiomycete fungi belonging to the genus Crinipellis (Agaricales), both of which are currently on an invasive front Classical biological control, in which coevolved natural enemies are considered to offer the most potenti... The main constraint and continuing threat to cocoa production in Latin America is disease caused by two basidiomycete fungi belonging to the genus Crinipellis (Agaricales), both of which are currently on an invasive front Classical biological control, in which coevolved natural enemies are considered to offer the most potential for sustainable control of invasive alien organisms, is investigated as a management strategy Our initial approach has been to search for the suspected coevolved host (Theobroma gileri) of one of these pathogens, Crinipellis roreri, the causal agent of frosty pod rot, in the mesic forests of north-west Ecuador; to isolate the endophytes and mycoparasites associated with both host and pathogen; to screen selected fungi in the greenhouse and laboratory, in order to determine their biocontrol potential Endophytes were isolated directly in the field from healthy tree boles and pods, and over 40 genera were recorded, mainly representing anamorphs of Hypocreales in the genera Acremonium, Clonostachys, Trichoderma and Verticillium, as well as basidiomycetes belonging to the Agaricales and Polyporales Of the endophytic fungi tested, most can be inoculated into and recovered from asymptomatic cocoa seedlings Twenty-eight mycoparasitic species were isolated from diseased pods and selected mycoparasites as well as endophytes were screened against C roreri using the pre-colonised plate method Consistently high mycoparasitism of the C roreri pseudostroma was demonstrated, particularly by a complex of Clonostachys and Trichoderma species read more read less

Topics:

Moniliophthora roreri (57%)57% related to the paper, Crinipellis (54%)54% related to the paper, Trichoderma (53%)53% related to the paper, Hypocreales (53%)53% related to the paper, Verticillium (51%)51% related to the paper
244 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11557-006-0039-2
Phylogeny and taxonomy of Cladosporium-like hyphomycetes, including Davidiella gen. nov., the teleomorph of Cladosporium s. str.
Uwe Braun1, Pedro W. Crous2, Frank M. Dugan3, Johannes Z. Groenewald2, G. Sybren de Hoog2
01 Feb 2003 - Mycological Progress

Abstract:

A phylogenetic study employing sequence data from the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1, ITS2) and 5.8S gene, as well as the 18S rRNA gene of various Cladosporium-like hyphomycetes revealed Cladosporium s. lat. to be heterogeneous. The genus Cladosporium s. str. was shown to represent a sister clade to Mycosphaerella s. str.... A phylogenetic study employing sequence data from the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1, ITS2) and 5.8S gene, as well as the 18S rRNA gene of various Cladosporium-like hyphomycetes revealed Cladosporium s. lat. to be heterogeneous. The genus Cladosporium s. str. was shown to represent a sister clade to Mycosphaerella s. str., for which the teleomorph genus Davidiella is proposed. The morphology, phylogeny and taxonomy of the cladosporioid fungi are discussed on the basis of this phylogeny, which consists of several clades representing Cladosporium-like genera. Cladosporium is confined to Davidiella (Mycosphaerellaceae) anamorphs with coronate conidiogenous loci and conidial hila. Pseudocladosporium is confined to anamorphs of Caproventuria (Venturiaceae). Cladosporium-like anamorphs of the Venturia (conidia catenate) are referred to Fusicladium. Human-pathogenic Cladosporium species belong in Cladophialophora (Capronia, Herpotrichiellaceae) and Cladosporium fulvum is representative of the Mycosphaerella/Passalora clade (Mycosphaerellaceae). Cladosporium malorum proved to provide the correct epithet for Pseudocladosporium kellermanianum (syn. Phaeoramularia kellermaniana, Cladophialophora kellermaniana) as well as Cladosporium porophorum. Based on differences in conidiogenesis and the structure of the conidiogenous loci, further supported by molecular data, C. malorum is allocated to Alternaria. read more read less

Topics:

Cladosporium (66%)66% related to the paper, Venturia (57%)57% related to the paper, Capronia (54%)54% related to the paper, Hyphomycetes (54%)54% related to the paper, Mycosphaerella (52%)52% related to the paper
171 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11557-006-0075-Y
Taxon-specific fungal primers reveal unexpectedly high diversity during leaf decomposition in a stream
Liliya G. Nikolcheva1, Felix Bärlocher1
01 Feb 2004 - Mycological Progress

Abstract:

Traditional techniques for studying the fungal community composition in streams favour the detection and identification of aquatic hyphomycetes. Our objective was to use molecular techniques to determine the presence and contributions of other fungal groups. We designed primers specific for the ITS regions in Ascomycota, Basi... Traditional techniques for studying the fungal community composition in streams favour the detection and identification of aquatic hyphomycetes. Our objective was to use molecular techniques to determine the presence and contributions of other fungal groups. We designed primers specific for the ITS regions in Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota and Oomycota. The primers were used to amplify DNA from linden, maple, and beech leaves, and birch wood submerged in a stream for 4 weeks in summer, autumn, winter and spring. The amplification products were separated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Ascomycota were present in large phylotype numbers (up to 21) on all substrates and all dates and represented ≥ 75 % of the fungal biomass. Basidiomycota were the second most abundant group in summer and autumn (up to 13 % on wood) and were absent only on linden and maple in spring. There were consistently large numbers of phylotypes from Chytridiomycota and their relative contribution to the microbial community peaked in winter on all substrates. Oomycota were present in summer and abundant only on wood. Zygomycota were present in low numbers and their estimated contribution to fungal biomass was ≤ 1%. Using primers to target individual groups facilitates a more balanced approach to studying fungal diversity in freshwater ecosystems. read more read less
169 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11557-006-0029-4
A new wood-decaying basidiomycete species associated with esca of grapevine: Fomitiporia mediterranea (Hymenochaetales)
01 Aug 2002 - Mycological Progress

Abstract:

Fomitiporia mediterranea is described as a new wood-decaying basidiomycete species associated with esca of grapevine in European wine-growing countries. Characters of the fruit body are essentially identical with those of the closely related species, Fomitiporia punctata. Fomitiporia mediterranea is distinct by the sequences ... Fomitiporia mediterranea is described as a new wood-decaying basidiomycete species associated with esca of grapevine in European wine-growing countries. Characters of the fruit body are essentially identical with those of the closely related species, Fomitiporia punctata. Fomitiporia mediterranea is distinct by the sequences of the ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region and by larger mycelial growth rates at temperatures between 15 °C and 35 °C. While F. punctata is confirmed as a homothallic species, F. mediterranea is shown to be outcrossing, exhibiting a unifactorial mating behaviour with a multiple allelism of the mating type factor, A; single spore isolates of F. mediterranea are intersterile in pairing tests with F. punctata. In southern Europe, F. mediterranea not only occurs on Vitis vinifera, but also on a number of other hardwood genera; it seems restricted to Vitis vinifera elsewhere in Europe. read more read less

Topics:

Fomitiporia mediterranea (83%)83% related to the paper, Fomitiporia (65%)65% related to the paper, Hymenochaetales (50%)50% related to the paper
166 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Mycological Progress.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Mycological Progress format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Mycological Progress in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Mycological Progress guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Mycological Progress guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Mycological Progress guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Mycological Progress?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Mycological Progress citation style.

4. Can I use the Mycological Progress templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Mycological Progress.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Mycological Progress that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Mycological Progress that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Mycological Progress?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Mycological Progress.

7. Where can I find the template for the Mycological Progress?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Mycological Progress's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Mycological Progress's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Mycological Progress an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Mycological Progress is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Mycological Progress?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Mycological Progress?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Mycological Progress?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Mycological Progress, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Mycological Progress's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Mycological Progress?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Mycological Progress. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Mycological Progress?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Mycological Progress are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Mycological Progress?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Mycological Progress's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Mycological Progress in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Mycological Progress Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Mycological Progress formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template