Example of Dialectica format
Recent searches

Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format Example of Dialectica format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Dialectica — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #177 of 644 down down by 57 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 73 Published Papers | 58 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 22/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.302
SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.699
SNIP: 1.341
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.4
SJR: 0.388
SNIP: 1.091
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.288
SNIP: 0.637

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.8

33% from 2019

CiteRatio for Dialectica from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.8
2019 0.6
2018 1.1
2017 1.1
2016 0.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.483

14% from 2019

SJR for Dialectica from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.483
2019 0.559
2018 0.664
2017 0.648
2016 0.694
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.167

3% from 2019

SNIP for Dialectica from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.167
2019 1.135
2018 1.082
2017 0.798
2016 0.746
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 33% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Dialectica

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Dialectica

Dialectica publishes first-rate articles predominantly in theoretical and systematic philosophy. It is edited in Switzerland and has a focus on analytical philosophy undertaken on the continent.  Continuing the work of its founding members, dialectica seeks a better understand...... Read More

Philosophy

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
22 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0012-2017
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.096
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1746-8361.1977.TB01296.X
More about metaphor
Max Black1
01 Dec 1977 - Dialectica

Abstract:

Summary An elaboration and defense of the “interaction view of metaphor” introduced in the author's earlier study, “Metaphor” (1962). Special attention is paid to the explication of the metaphors used in the earlier account. The topics discussed include: selection of the “targets” of the theory; classification of metaphor... Summary An elaboration and defense of the “interaction view of metaphor” introduced in the author's earlier study, “Metaphor” (1962). Special attention is paid to the explication of the metaphors used in the earlier account. The topics discussed include: selection of the “targets” of the theory; classification of metaphors; how metaphorical statements work; relations between metaphors and similes; metaphorical thought; criteria of recognition; the “creative” aspects of metaphors; the ontological status of metaphors. Metaphors are found to be more closely connected with background models than has previously been recognized. read more read less

Topics:

Metaphor (57%)57% related to the paper, Explication (54%)54% related to the paper
946 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1746-8361.1989.TB00933.X
Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?*
John Worrall1
01 Jun 1989 - Dialectica

Abstract:

Summary The main argument for scientific realism is that our present theories in science are so successful empirically that they can’t have got that way by chance - instead they must somehow have latched onto the blueprint of the universe. The main argument against scientific realism is that there have been enormously success... Summary The main argument for scientific realism is that our present theories in science are so successful empirically that they can’t have got that way by chance - instead they must somehow have latched onto the blueprint of the universe. The main argument against scientific realism is that there have been enormously successful theories which were once accepted but are now regarded as false. The central question addressed in this paper is whether there is some reasonable way to have the best of both worlds: to give the argument from scientific revolutions its full weight and yet still adopt some sort of realist attitude towards presently accepted theories in physics and elsewhere. I argue that there is such a way - through strucfurul realism, a position adopted by PoincarC, and here elaborated and defended. Resume L’argument principal en faveur du realisme scientifique, c’est que nos theories scientifiques actuelles sont empiriquement si efficaces que cela ne peut pas Etre di3 au hasard - on doit en quelque sorte avoir decouvert les plans de I’univers. L’argument principal contre le realisme scientifique, c’est qu’il y a eu des theories scientifiques massivement efficaces qui ont ete autrefois tenues pour vraies mais sont considerkes aujourd’hui comme fausses. La principale question traitee dans ce papier, c’est s’il y a un moyen raisonnable de prendre le meilleur des deux mondes: de donner tout son poids a l’argument tire des revolutions scientifiques et d’adopter pourtant une sorte d’attitude realiste a I’egard des theories actuellement acceptkes en physique ou ailleurs. Je rnontre qu’une telle voie existe: le realisme sfrucfurel, une position adoptke par Poincare, que je defends et dkveloppe ici. Zusammenfassung Das Hauptargument fur wissenschaftlichen Realismus ist, dass unsere gegenwartigen Theorien in der Wissenschaft empirisch so erfolgreich sind, dass sie nicht zuftilligerweise so geworden sein kdnnen - statt dessen miissen sie irgendwie mit dem Plan des Universums Ubereinstimmen. Das Hauptargument gegen den wissenschaftlichen Realismus ist, dass es ausgesprochen erfolgreiche Theorien gegeben hat, die einmal akzeptiert gewesen waren, aber jetzt als falsch betrachtet werden. Die in diesem Papier behandelte Kernfrage lautet, ob es einen verniinftigen Weg gibt, aus beiden Weltcn das Beste zu haben: dem Argument vom Vorhandensein wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen sein volles Gewicht zu geben und dennoch eine Art von realistischer Einstellung gegeniiber den heute in der Physik und anderswo akzeptierten Theorien einzunehmen. Ich argumentiere, dass es einen solchen Weg gibt - durch den von Poincart iibernommenen strukturellen Realismus, der hier ausgearbeitet und verteidigt wird. read more read less
View PDF
824 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1746-8361.1958.TB01464.X
Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte erweiterung Des finiten standpunktes
Von Kurt Gödel1
01 Dec 1958 - Dialectica

Abstract:

Zusammenfassung P. Bernays hat darauf hingewiesen, dass man, um die Widerspruchs freiheit der klassischen Zahlentheorie zu beweisen, den Hilbertschen flniter Standpunkt dadurch erweitern muss, dass man neben den auf Symbole sich beziehenden kombinatorischen Begriffen gewisse abstrakte Begriffe zulasst, Die abstrakten Begri... Zusammenfassung P. Bernays hat darauf hingewiesen, dass man, um die Widerspruchs freiheit der klassischen Zahlentheorie zu beweisen, den Hilbertschen flniter Standpunkt dadurch erweitern muss, dass man neben den auf Symbole sich beziehenden kombinatorischen Begriffen gewisse abstrakte Begriffe zulasst, Die abstrakten Begriffe, die bisher fur diesen Zweck verwendet wurden, sinc die der konstruktiven Ordinalzahltheorie und die der intuitionistischer. Logik. Es wird gezeigt, dass man statt deesen den Begriff einer berechenbaren Funktion endlichen einfachen Typs uber den naturlichen Zahler benutzen kann, wobei keine anderen Konstruktionsverfahren fur solche Funktionen notig sind, als einfache Rekursion nach einer Zahlvariablen und Einsetzung von Funktionen ineinander (mit trivialen Funktionen als Ausgangspunkt). Abstract P. Bernays has pointed out that, in order to prove the consistency of classical number theory, it is necessary to extend Hilbert's finitary stand-point by admitting certain abstract concepts in addition to the combinatorial concepts referring to symbols. The abstract concepts that so far have been used for this purpose are those of the constructive theory of ordinals and those of intuitionistic logic. It is shown that the concept of a computable function of finite simple type over the integers can be used instead, where no other procedures of constructing such functions are necessary except simple recursion by an integral variable and substitution of functions in each other (starting with trivial functions). read more read less
View PDF
630 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1746-8361.1969.TB01194.X
Adjointness in Foundations
F. William Lawvere1
01 Dec 1969 - Dialectica

Abstract:

In this article we see how already in 1967 category theory had made explicit a number of conceptual advances that were entering into the everyday practice of mathematics. For example, local Galois connections (in algebraic geometry, model theory, linear algebra, etc.) are globalized into functors, such as Spec, carrying much ... In this article we see how already in 1967 category theory had made explicit a number of conceptual advances that were entering into the everyday practice of mathematics. For example, local Galois connections (in algebraic geometry, model theory, linear algebra, etc.) are globalized into functors, such as Spec, carrying much more information. Also, “theories” (even when presented symbolically) are viewed explicitly as categories; so are the background universes of sets that serve as the recipients for models. (Models themselves are functors, hence preserve the fundamental operation of substitution/composition in terms of which the other logical operations can be characterized as local adjoints.) My 1963 observation (referred to by Eilenberg and Kelly in La Jolla, 1965), that cartesian closed categories serve as a common abstraction of type theory and propositional logic, permits an invariant algebraic treatment of the essential problem of proof theory, though most of the later work by proof theorists still relies on presentation-dependent formulations. This article sums up a stage of the development of the relationship between category theory and proof theory. (For more details see Proceedings of the AMS Symposium on Pure Mathematics XVII (1970), pp. 1–14, and Marcel Dekker, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, no. 180 (1996), pp. 181–189.) The main problem addressed by proof theory arises from the existential quantifier in “there exists a proof. . . ”. The strategy to interpret proofs themselves as structures had been discussed by Kreisel; however, the influential “realizers” of Kleene are not yet the usual mathematical sort of structures. Inspired by Lauchli’s 1967 success in finding a completeness theorem for Heyting predicate calculus lurking in the category of ordinary permutations, I presented, at the 1967 AMS Los Angeles Symposium on Set Theory, a common functorization of several geometrical structures, including such proof-theoretic structures. As Hyperdoctrines, those structures are described in the Proceedings of the read more read less

Topics:

Proof theory (64%)64% related to the paper, Mathematical proof (62%)62% related to the paper, Category theory (62%)62% related to the paper, Type theory (59%)59% related to the paper, First-order logic (58%)58% related to the paper
View PDF
368 Citations
Book Chapter DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815676.009
The Theory of Local Beables
01 Jun 2004 - Dialectica

Topics:

Causality (physics) (67%)67% related to the paper
View PDF
316 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Dialectica.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Dialectica format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Dialectica in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Dialectica guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Dialectica guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Dialectica guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Dialectica?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Dialectica citation style.

4. Can I use the Dialectica templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Dialectica.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Dialectica that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Dialectica that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Dialectica?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Dialectica.

7. Where can I find the template for the Dialectica?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Dialectica's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Dialectica's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Dialectica an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Dialectica is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Dialectica?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Dialectica?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Dialectica?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Dialectica, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Dialectica's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Dialectica?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Dialectica. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Dialectica?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Dialectica are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Dialectica?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Dialectica's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Dialectica in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Dialectica Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Dialectica formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template