Huntingdon Life Sciences

About: Huntingdon Life Sciences is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Bioanalysis & No-observed-adverse-effect level. The organization has 330 authors who have published 378 publications receiving 12252 citations.

Bioanalytical method validation--a revisit with a decade of progress.

Abstract: This report is a synthesis of (1) the earlier conference on Analytical Methods Validation−Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies (Conference held in Arlington, VA, December 3–5, 1990 and the report published in Pharmaceutical Research, 9: 588-592, 1992) and (2) the workshop on “Bioanalytical Methods Validation—A Revisit with a Decade of Progress,” (Workshop held in Arlington, VA, January 12–14, 2000), sponsored by the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists and the U. S. Food and Drug Administration. The bioanalytical method validation workshop of January 12–14, 2000 was directed towards small molecules. A separate workshop was held in March 1–3, 2000 to discuss validation principles for macromolecules. The purpose of this report is to represent the progress in analytical methodologies over the last decade and assessment of the major agreements and issues discussed with regard to small molecules at both the conference and the workshop. The report is also intended to provide guiding principles for validation of bioanalytical methods employed in support of bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies in man and in animals.

Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup.

Abstract: As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9-10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH >13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the "Gold Standard". As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.

Male Reproductive System

Abstract: Much of the work of the pathologist in understanding male reproductive toxicity comes from trying to understand the initial site of toxicant action – that is, distinguishing the initial effects from the follow-on events. These changes can happen because of, or completely independent of, initial impacts on male reproductive hormones. Fortunately, the patterns of response and the holistic evaluation of a wide variety of different but complementary data allow for considerable confidence in assigning an initiating site of action. This chapter will review the anatomy and physiology as well as successful strategies for understanding toxicities in this complicated and sublime multi-organ system.

Normal structure, function, and histology of lymph nodes.

Abstract: Lymph nodes are traditionally regarded as having three compartments, the cortex, paracortex and medulla. B and T cells home to separate areas within these compartments, interact with antigen presenting cells, and undergo clonal expansion. This paper provides structural and functional details about how the lymph node brings lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells together. The concept of the lymphoid lobule as the basic functional and anatomic unit of the lymph node is developed and utilized to provide a framework for understanding lymph node pathobiology. Understanding the histomorphologic features of the lymphoid lobule and the role of the reticular meshwork scaffolding of the lymph node and how these related to the cortex, paracortex and medulla provides a unique approach to understanding lymph node structure and function.

Fixation of Testes and Eyes Using a Modified Davidson's Fluid: Comparison with Bouin's Fluid and Conventional Davidson's Fluid

Abstract: Most recent revisions of regulatory guidelines for testing effects of chemicals on reproduction recommend Bouin's fluid (BF) or a "comparable fixative" instead of formalin to preserve the morphologic detail of testes for histopathological evaluation. However, picric acid in BF is a health and safety hazard, as well as a laboratory waste disposal problem. Furthermore, use of BF is labor intensive, requiring multiple alcohol rinses to remove picric acid for optimum preservation and immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of testicular antigens that may potentially be used to identify and quantify cells and functional proteins with critical roles in spermatogenesis. Recently a modified Davidson's fluid (mDF) has been reported as an altemative to BF to fix testes for routine histopathological examination. This study compared the overall histomorphologic clarity and the immuno- and histochemical staining of testicular specimens fixed in BF and mDF. Additionally, because conventional Davidson's fixative (DF) is used routinely for optimum fixation of eyes, preservation of ocular histomorphology by DF and mDF was compared. mDF resulted in noticeably less shrinkage of the seminiferous tubules and superior overall morphologic detail compared to BF. Unlike DF, the mDF also supported excellent staining of acrosomes with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reagent when staging of spermatogenesis was required. IHC detection of androgen receptor and PCNA (to directly and indirectly identify Sertoli cells) as well as protein gene product 9.5 (to label spermatogonia) was Superior in mDF compared to BF-fixed specimens. For histopathological examination of the eye, apposition and preservation of rods and cones, and nuclear layers of the retina were slightly inferior with mDF compared to DF. This paper has demonstrated that mDF provides comparable, and in many respects superior preservation of the testes to that of BF, both for IHC staining and for detailed histopathological examination. It also provides an acceptable fixative for eyes, although the quality of cellular preservation is inferior to that of DF.