scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1836-0394

Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance 

UTS ePRESS
About: Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance is an academic journal published by UTS ePRESS. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Local government & Government. It has an ISSN identifier of 1836-0394. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 229 publications have been published receiving 1531 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on district assemblies' perspectives of what factors lead to failures in planning and propose reform proposals for reforming the planning system in Ghana, arguing that five major challenges inhibit planning, namely: an inflexible land ownership system, an unresponsive legislative framework, undue political interference, an acute human resource shortage, and the lack of a sustainable funding strategy.
Abstract: Planning has failed to exert effective influence on the growth of human settlements in Ghana. As a result, the growth of cities has been chaotic. The district assemblies, which are the designated planning authorities, are commonly blamed for this failure, yet little attention has been given to district assemblies’ perspectives of what factors lead to failures in planning. This paper attempts to fill this gap. Drawing on fieldwork in Ghana, it argues that, from the perspective of district assemblies, five major challenges inhibit planning, namely: an inflexible land ownership system, an unresponsive legislative framework, undue political interference, an acute human resource shortage, and the lack of a sustainable funding strategy. The paper concludes with proposals for reforming the planning system in Ghana.

61 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a brief introduction to the recent history of local government in South Africa, as well as the legal and policy framework for local government, and highlight the need for a clearer definition of localGovernment mandates and a greater recognition of the role of big cities.
Abstract: This paper provides a brief introduction to the recent history of, as well as the legal and policy framework for, local government in South Africa. It discusses the transformation of local government from a racially configured, illegitimate arm of the apartheid government into a system designed to produce developmentally oriented municipalities. The progress made by South African municipalities towards realising the vision of developmental local government is remarkable and unprecedented. Over the last 13 years, municipalities have embarked on the extension of infrastructure and development, whilst absorbing fundamental changes to their internal governance and management arrangements, financial management systems and intergovernmental responsibilities. The new local government system offers great potential for the realisation of a better life for all citizens, facilitated by a new generation of municipalities. However, the challenges remain huge and some of these can be attributed to institutional fault lines. These include challenges that come with large, inclusive municipalities, new executive systems and the political appointment of senior officials. The paper also identifies the downside of overzealous institutionalisation of community participation. With regard to intergovernmental relations, the paper highlights the need for a clearer definition of local government mandates and a greater recognition of the role of big cities. The current insistence on comprehensive intergovernmental alignment of policies and budgets is questioned, and suggestions are made to substitute this with an approach of selective alignment around key national priorities.

61 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, the extent to which contemporary views of participatory governance have taken root at local and sub-local levels and concludes that despite reforms int ended to engage local citizens more in local government activity, citizen participatio n has yet to develop significantly into arrangements that reach the leve l of participative governance, leadership may often have to come from organisations outside i nstitutional local government.
Abstract: This paper identifies types of citizen participatio n in local government in Australia, in particular focusing on the past two decades when local government systems have been the focus of intense reform. The paper co nsiders the extent to which contemporary views of participatory governance have taken root at local and sublocal levels and concludes that despite reforms int ended to engage local citizens more in local government activity, citizen particip ation has yet to develop significantly into arrangements that reach the leve l of participatory governance. It also argues that for participatory governance to be further developed, leadership may often have to come from organisations outside i nstitutional local government.

55 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the extent to which contemporary views of participatory governance have taken root at local and sub-local levels and concludes that despite reforms intended to engage local citizens more in local government activity, citizen participation has yet to develop significantly into arrangements that reach the level of participation.
Abstract: This paper identifies types of citizen participation in local government in Australia, in particular focusing on the past two decades when local government systems have been the focus of intense reform. The paper considers the extent to which contemporary views of participatory governance have taken root at local and sub-local levels and concludes that despite reforms intended to engage local citizens more in local government activity, citizen participation has yet to develop significantly into arrangements that reach the level of participatory governance. It also argues that for participatory governance to be further developed, leadership may often have to come from organisations outside institutional local government.

42 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In Malaysia, local government is the responsibility of the states, but the federal government also exercises considerable power and influence over local government, especially in peninsular Malaysia as discussed by the authors, where the dynamic of the Malaysian federal system is such that it has shifted the balance of power to the centre.
Abstract: Local government in Malaysia occupies the third and lowest level after federal and state governments. Under the Malaysian federal constitution (paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Ninth Schedule), local government is the responsibility of the states, but the federal government also exercises considerable power and influence over local government, especially in peninsular Malaysia. The dynamic of the Malaysian federal system is such that it has shifted the balance of power to the centre.Local government accounts for only 1% of GDP. There are 144 local authorities divided into cities (major administrative and commercial centres), municipalities (other urban areas), and districts (chiefly rural areas). Executive powers rest with the Mayor (cities) or President, supported and/or overseen by a system of committees. Currently, local councils in Malaysia are not elected: councillors are appointed by the state government for 3-year terms (with the option of re-appointment) and in most cases come from the ruling coalition.

38 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202221
20213
202014
20199
20189
201711