scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Drugs in 1991"


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: By inhibiting bone resorption, these compounds correct hypercalcaemia and hypercalciuria, reduce pain, the occurrence of fractures, as well as the development of new osteolytic lesions, and in consequence improve the quality of life.
Abstract: The geminal bisphosphonates are a new class of drugs characterised by a P-C-P bond. Consequently, they are analogues of pyrophosphate, but are resistant to chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis. The bisphosphonates bind strongly to hydroxyapatite crystals and inhibit their formation and dissolution. This physicochemical effect leads in vivo to the prevention of soft tissue calcification and, in some instances, inhibition of normal calcification. The main effect is to inhibit bone resorption, but in contrast to the effect on mineralisation, the mechanism involved is cellular. These various effects vary greatly according to the structure of the individual bisphosphonate. The half-life of circulating bisphosphonates is very brief, in the order of minutes to hours. 20% to 50% of a given dose is taken up by the skeleton, the rest being excreted in the urine. The half-life in bone is far longer and depends upon the turnover rate of the skeleton itself. Bisphosphonates are very well tolerated; the relatively few adverse events that have been associated with their use are specific for each compound. Bisphosphonates have been used to treat various clinical conditions, namely ectopic calcification, ectopic bone formation, Paget's disease, osteoporosis and increased osteolysis of malignant origin. The three compounds commercially available for use in tumour-induced bone disease are in order of increasing potency, etidronate, clodronate and pamidronate. Most data have been obtained with the latter two agents. By inhibiting bone resorption, they correct hypercalcaemia and hypercalciuria, reduce pain, the occurrence of fractures, as well as the development of new osteolytic lesions, and in consequence improve the quality of life. In view of these actions, of their excellent tolerability and of the fact that they are active for relatively long periods, these compounds are, after rehydration, the drugs of choice in tumour-induced bone disease and an excellent auxiliary to the drugs used in oncology.

584 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: The potential for cyclophosphamide-induced cancers, particularly in the bladder, must be recognised and this agent remains a highly effective drug in many situations.
Abstract: Cyclophosphamide, an orally active alkylating agent, is widely used to treat a variety of malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Although it has some tumour selectivity, it also possesses a wide spectrum of toxicities. The requirement of metabolic activation before cyclophosphamide exerts either its therapeutic or toxic effects is well established, but has not led to effective counter-measures. Clinically, damage to the bladder (haemorrhagic cystitis), immunosuppression (when not desired) and alopecia are the most significant toxicities associated with cyclophosphamide. Cardiotoxicity is also a possibility when very high doses are given. Preventing these toxicities has focused on modifications of the treatment regimens and, in the case of haemorrhagic cystitis, the administration of a drug which is excreted in the urine where it inactivates the bladder-toxic species. As treatment regimens for cancer become more effective in prolonging a patient's life, and as cyclophosphamide receives increasing use for nonmalignant disorders, the potential for cyclophosphamide-induced cancers, particularly in the bladder, must be recognised. Although the toxicities associated with cyclophosphamide are serious, this agent remains a highly effective drug in many situations. Research on the pathways which play an important role in activating this drug may improve our ability to target particular diseases and decrease unwanted side effects.

362 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: The therapeutic efficacy of SOD, α- tocopherol and ascorbic acid in the treatment of human disease is generally unimpressive to date although dietary deficiencies of the last two molecules should certainly be avoided.
Abstract: A free radical is any species capable of independent existence that contains one or more unpaired electrons. Free radical reactions have been implicated in the pathology of more than 50 human diseases. Radicals and other reactive oxygen species are formed constantly in the human body, both by deliberate synthesis (e.g. by activated phagocytes) and by chemical side-reactions. They are removed by enzymic and nonenzymic antioxidant defence systems. Oxidative stress, occurring when antioxidant defences are inadequate, can damage lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and DNA. A few clinical conditions are caused by oxidative stress, but more often the stress results from the disease. Sometimes it then makes a significant contribution to the disease pathology, and sometimes it does not. Several antioxidants are available for therapeutic use. They include molecules naturally present in the body [superoxide dismutase (SOD), alpha-tocopherol, glutathione and its precursors, ascorbic acid, adenosine, lactoferrin and carotenoids] as well as synthetic antioxidants [such as thiols, ebselen (PZ51), xanthine oxidase inhibitors, inhibitors of phagocyte function, iron ion chelators and probucol]. The therapeutic efficacy of SOD, alpha-tocopherol and ascorbic acid in the treatment of human disease is generally unimpressive to date although dietary deficiencies of the last two molecules should certainly be avoided. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors may be of limited relevance as antioxidants for human use. Exciting preliminary results with probucol (antiatherosclerosis), ebselen (anti-inflammatory), and iron ion chelators (in thalassaemia, leukaemia, malaria, stroke, traumatic brain injury and haemorrhagic shock) need to be confirmed by controlled clinical trials. Clinical testing of N-acetylcysteine in HIV-1-positive subjects may also be merited. A few drugs already in clinical use may have some antioxidant properties, but this ability is not widespread and drug-derived radicals may occasionally cause significant damage.

356 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Overall, available data appear to indicate that while the efficacy of paroxetine is similar to that of traditional antidepressant drugs, the newer agent possesses much improved tolerability and may be beneficial when treating patients with an increased risk of suicide.
Abstract: Paroxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuronal reuptake of serotonin, thereby facilitating serotoninergic transmission; this action appears to account for the antidepressant activity observed with this drug. A mean terminal elimination half-life of approximately 24 hours permits once daily administration. Results of short term clinical trials have shown paroxetine to be significantly superior to placebo, and comparable to amitriptyline, clomipramine, imipramine, dothiepin and mianserin in relieving symptoms associated with major depressive disorders. Paroxetine has shown some preliminary promise in the treatment of depressive illness resistant to tricyclic antidepressant therapy but further studies are required before any conclusions can be drawn. Paroxetine in therapeutic doses has been very well tolerated, and the favourable tolerability profile of this agent appears to be its primary advantage over traditional antidepressant agents. Paroxetine causes minimal anticholinergic-type adverse effects, and unlike tricyclic antidepressants, it does not precipitate cardiovascular effects or provoke cardiac conduction disturbances. Nausea has been the most frequently reported adverse event during short term use of paroxetine, but it is generally mild and transient and subsides with continued use. With longer term use headache, sweating and constipation were the most frequently reported side effects but the incidence rate was not significantly different from that noted for comparator antidepressants. Furthermore, the frequency of withdrawal due to adverse effects is less with paroxetine than with tricyclic antidepressant agents. Overall, available data appear to indicate that while the efficacy of paroxetine is similar to that of traditional antidepressant drugs, the newer agent possesses much improved tolerability. In addition, the wide therapeutic index of paroxetine may be beneficial when treating patients with an increased risk of suicide. Thus, paroxetine clearly looks to become a valuable addition to the range of drugs currently available to treat depressive illness. Future research may help to further define the relative place of this newer agent in antidepressant therapy and determine how its overall therapeutic efficacy compares with that of other related antidepressant agents such as fluoxetine.

324 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Mitoxantrone is an effective and better tolerated alternative to the anthracyclines in most haematological malignancies, in breast cancer and in advanced hepatic or ovarian carcinoma, and synergy with other antineoplastic drugs has been demonstrated in murine tumour models.
Abstract: Mitoxantrone is a dihydroxyanthracenedione derivative which as intravenous mono- and combination therapy has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy similar to that of standard induction and salvage treatment regimens in advanced breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia and chronic myelogenous leukaemia in blast crisis; it appears to be an effective alternative to the anthracycline component of standard treatment regimens in these indications. Mitoxantrone is also effective as a component of predominantly palliative treatment regimens for hepatic and advanced ovarian carcinoma. Limited studies suggest useful therapeutic activity in multiple myeloma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Regional therapy of malignant effusions, hepatic and ovarian carcinomas has also been very effective, with a reduction in systemic adverse effects. Mitoxantrone inhibits DNA synthesis by intercalating DNA, inducing DNA strand breaks, and causing DNA aggregation and compaction, and delays cell cycle progression, particularly in late S phase. In vitro antitumour activity is concentration- and exposure time-proportional, and synergy with other antineoplastic drugs has been demonstrated in murine tumour models. Leucopenia may be dose-limiting in patients with solid tumours, whereas stomatitis may be dose-limiting in patients with leukaemia. Other adverse effects are usually of mild or moderate severity although cardiac effects, particularly congestive heart failure, may be of concern, especially in patients with a history of anthracycline therapy, mediastinal irradiation or cardiovascular disease. Mitoxantrone displays an improved tolerability profile compared with doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, although myelosuppression may occur more frequently. Thus, mitoxantrone is an effective and better tolerated alternative to the anthracyclines in most haematological malignancies, in breast cancer and in advanced hepatic or ovarian carcinoma. Further studies may consolidate its role in the treatment of these and other malignancies.

301 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Current evidence supports a trial of this agent as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory seizure disorders, and future investigation of vigabatrin monotherapy and its efficacy relative to established agents is awaited with interest.
Abstract: Vigabatrin was specifically designed to enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) function in the CNS. By increasing brain concentrations of this inhibitory neurotransmitter the drug appears to decrease propagation of abnormal hypersynchronous discharges, thereby reducing seizure activity. At this stage in its development, clinical experience with vigabatrin is limited primarily to patients with refractory seizure disorders. In this difficult-to-treat population, 'add-on' therapy with vigabatrin greater than or equal to 2 g/day has shown impressive efficacy, reducing seizure frequency by greater than or equal to 50% in approximately half of patients. Clinical efficacy does seem to vary with seizure type with the best response reported in adults with complex partial seizures with or without generalisation and in children with cryptogenic partial epilepsy or symptomatic infantile spasm. Vigabatrin appears to have a negative effect on absences and myoclonic seizures. Some disorders of motor control may also be amenable to enhanced GABAergic function. In the small number of patients with tardive dyskinesia treated to date, vigabatrin produced mild to moderate improvement in hyperkinetic symptom scores but Parkinsonism or schizophrenic symptoms occasionally worsened. The best response was reported in a study of patients who had been withdrawn from neuroleptic therapy. In a small but well-controlled comparative trial, vigabatrin was as effective as baclofen in reducing spasm and improving some parameters of spasticity in patients with spinal cord lesions or multiple sclerosis. Most adverse reactions to vigabatrin are mild and transient with central nervous system (CNS) changes being reported most frequently. Of particular note, serial evoked potential studies and the few available histology reports have not found evidence of intramyelinic oedema during therapeutic use, as was reported in rats and dogs on chronic high-dose treatment. Thus, vigabatrin is a promising new anticonvulsant drug. Current evidence supports a trial of this agent as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory seizure disorders, and future investigation of vigabatrin monotherapy and its efficacy relative to established agents is awaited with interest. Wider experience should help to clarify which patients - by seizure type and concurrent CNS pathology - are likely to benefit from vigabatrin and ongoing monitoring should further clarify the potential detrimental effects, if any, of long term use. In the meantime, it is a welcome addition in the difficult setting of resistant epilepsy.

287 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Omeprazole plus amoxicillin appears to be better tolerated than triple therapy and represents a first-line treatment alternative in patients with H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease.
Abstract: Omeprazole, a gastric acid pump inhibitor, dose-dependently controls gastric acid secretion: the drug has greater antisecretory activity than histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Omeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day is more effective than histamine H2-receptor antagonists in the short term treatment of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Available data suggest that omeprazole 10 to 40 mg/day is also more effective than ranitidine in the maintenance therapy of duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. The drug is also effective in patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer or reflux oesophagitis poorly responsive to histamine H2-receptor antagonists. The efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg/day appears to be similar to that of lansoprazole 30 mg/day in the short term treatment of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. However, most available studies have been reported in abstract form only, and 2 of 3 studies in patients with duodenal ulcer have shown greater healing rates at 2 (but not 4) weeks with lansoprazole. Helicobacter pylori eradication decreases duodenal ulcer relapse rates and appears to be associated with improved duodenal ulcer healing rates. Evidence also suggests that H. pylori eradication is associated with reduced gastric ulcer relapse rates. Omeprazole monotherapy may suppress but does not eradicate H. pylori infection. Eradication rates with omeprazole 20 or 40 mg twice daily plus amoxicillin usually up to 2 g/day (3 g/day in a few studies) for 2 weeks appear to be similar to those of standard triple therapy (bismuth salt plus metronidazole, plus tetracycline or amoxicillin) or omeprazole plus clarithromycin, although eradication rates vary widely. Omeprazole plus amoxicillin appears to be better tolerated than triple therapy and represents a first-line treatment alternative in patients with H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease. Omeprazole plus amoxicillin plus metronidazole appears to be more effective than omeprazole plus amoxicillin in patients with metronidazole-sensitive H. pylori infection. Omeprazole remains a treatment of choice in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The dosages should be adjusted according to individual response. However, relatively low dosages of 10 to 40 mg/day may be sufficient in some patients. The drug has also shown promise in the treatment of children with severe reflux oesophagitis, in patients with reflux oesophagitis and coexisting systemic sclerosis, and in the prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Evidence suggests that omeprazole is more effective than ranitidine in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastric damage who continue to take NSAIDs, especially in patients with large gastric ulcers; however, completion of ongoing studies is required to verify this.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

279 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: The authors challenge the general view that the analgesic effect of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be universally attributed to their inhibitory effects on the synthesis of peripherally formed prostaglandins.
Abstract: The authors challenge the general view that the analgesic effect of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be universally attributed to their inhibitory effects on the synthesis of peripherally formed prostaglandins. Analgesic activity by some of these compounds in the reduction of physiological pain elicited by a single noxious stimulus, or the treatment of acute pain which results from sudden trauma to otherwise healthy tissue, is better described as an antinociceptive effect. Single-dose studies in the dental pain model that have been conducted in double-blind conditions and included a placebo control group have been reviewed; those NSAIDs which are significantly superior to the reference compound aspirin 650mg and those which could represent real alternatives to the use of narcotics in certain situations for the management of acute pain have been identified. Azapropazone, diflunisal, naproxen, oxaprozin and tolmetin are all weak inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis, yet they have been shown to be more effective than aspirin. In a model of joint pain, azapropazone 600mg has been shown to be as effective as pethidine (meperidine) 100mg despite being the weakest inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis. Whether the antinociceptive effect of azapropazone acts at a peripheral or a central level, or both, is not clear; evidence for the effects of NSAIDs on the central nervous system (CNS) is discussed. Historically, the antinociceptive character of some NSAIDs is apparent in several studies in both animals and humans. More recently, experimental algesimetry models designed to distinguish the antinociceptive effects of NSAIDs include the use in humans of photoplethysmography and computer-supported infrared thermographic imaging.

259 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Although treatment with foscarnet produces some severe adverse effects, with care these can be minimised, and the drug produces clinical improvement in a large proportion of patients; this is a highly encouraging finding at this stage in its development.
Abstract: The pyrophosphate analogue, foscarnet, selectively inhibits the DNA polymerase of human herpes viruses, including cytomegalovirus, and the reverse transcriptase of HIV. Viral replication is therefore prevented, but resumes when the drug is cleared from infected cells. In vitro, the combination of foscarnet and zidovudine (azidothymidine) has an additive effect against cytomegalovirus and acts synergistically against HIV. An improvement in cytomegalovirus retinitis is obtained in over 85% of affected AIDS patients during foscarnet induction therapy, but relapse usually occurs within a month of ceasing treatment. There is a similar duration of remission during maintenance therapy given for 5 days each week, but this can be extended 4- to 5-fold with daily administration of higher doses. In allograft recipients, progression of retinitis can be halted by foscarnet until immune function recovers and eradicates the virus. The incidence of acute renal failure, which is common during foscarnet therapy, may be reduced by dosage adjustment and adequate prehydration. Anaemia, phlebitis, nausea and vomiting, and disturbances in serum calcium and phosphate levels, perhaps resulting from uptake of foscarnet into bone or chelation with ionised calcium, have also been associated with administration of the drug. Cytomegalovirus retinitis is difficult to treat, with few therapeutic options available. Although treatment with foscarnet produces some severe adverse effects, with care these can be minimised, and the drug produces clinical improvement in a large proportion of patients; this is a highly encouraging finding at this stage in its development. Preliminary comparative data indicate that foscarnet and ganciclovir are similarly effective, but foscarnet may have some theoretical advantages in AIDS patients since it can be used in combination with zidovudine without potentiating myelosuppression.

241 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Guido Magni1
01 Nov 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: This article reviews the results of some 40 placebo-controlled studies and concludes that a wide range of pain conditions are responsive to antidepressant drug treatment, in particular: headache, migraine, facial pain, neurogenic pain, fibrositis, and probably arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Abstract: In the last 30 years antidepressant drugs have been used increasingly in the treatment of patients with chronic pain. This article reviews the results of some 40 placebo-controlled studies. It is difficult to make comparisons between the various studies because they often differ in terms of pain conditions, patient selection, antidepressant drug used, dosages, trial design, etc. However, in spite of this heterogeneity and other methodological problems it is clear that a wide range of pain conditions are responsive to antidepressant drug treatment, in particular: headache, migraine, facial pain, neurogenic pain, fibrositis, and probably arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. More data need to be gathered in cancer pain, and in other conditions such as low back pain for which no, or very limited, effect has been shown. The beneficial effects of antidepressant drugs is in most cases of a mild to moderate degree, some time lag is necessary before it is completely manifest, and it tends to persist over time if drug treatment is continued in the long term. Strong evidence of efficacy is not evident for all the antidepressants, and there are probably significant differences in this respect between various drugs. The effect of a drug on pain does not seem necessarily to be related to its effect on mood. Further studies are needed to clarify this topic, and it will be necessary to examine specific pain conditions, compare different antidepressants, with reference to each other and to placebo, further investigate the role of drug plasma concentrations and control for the presence of concomitant psychiatric disturbances and for organic lesions responsible for the pain symptomatology.

230 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Amlodipine seems to provide a useful alternative to other agents currently available for the treatment of essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris, with certain pharmacodynamic and tolerability properties that should be advantageous in many patients.
Abstract: Amlodipine, a basic dihydropyridine derivative, inhibits the calcium influx through 'slow' channels in peripheral vascular and coronary smooth muscle cells, thus producing marked vasodilation in peripheral and coronary vascular beds. Short to medium term clinical trials indicate that amlodipine is effective as both an antianginal agent in patients with stable angina pectoris and an antihypertensive agent in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In small comparative studies amlodipine was at least as effective as 'standard' agents, including atenolol, verapamil, hydrochlorothiazide or captopril in hypertension, and diltiazem or nadolol in angina pectoris. Amlodipine is well tolerated, and does not appear to cause some of the undesirable effects often associated with other cardiovascular agents (e.g. adverse changes in serum lipid patterns, cardiac conduction disturbances, postural hypotension). The most common adverse effects associated with amlodipine therapy--oedema and flushing--are related to the vasodilatory action of the drug, and are generally mild to moderate in severity. Thus, amlodipine seems to provide a useful alternative to other agents currently available for the treatment of essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris, with certain pharmacodynamic and tolerability properties that should be advantageous in many patients.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Preliminary data suggest that citalopram may be particularly useful in patients who cannot tolerate the anticholinergic or cardiovascular side effects of tricyclic antidepressants and in those for whom sedation is not indicated.
Abstract: Citalopram is an antidepressant belonging to a new class of drugs which enhance serotoninergic neurotransmission through potent and selective inhibition of serotonin reuptake. Preliminary trials suggest that its short term therapeutic efficacy is significantly greater than that of placebo and mianserin, and comparable to that of amitriptyline, maprotiline and imipramine. It appears to be a weaker antidepressant agent than clomipramine, but better tolerated. Its elimination half-life of 33 hours permits once daily oral administration. Symptomatic improvement obtained with short term treatment has been maintained when therapy has been extended for up to 1 year; in the few patients studied for this extended period, the relapse rate was lower than with fluvoxamine, fluoxetine or imipramine. Compared to standard antidepressant agents, citalopram is well tolerated. It does not appear to be cardiotoxic, has not been associated with seizures in humans, and is relatively nonsedating. Unlike the tricyclic antidepressants, citalopram has minimal anticholinergic effects. Mild and transient nausea, with or without vomiting, is the most frequent adverse effect--occurring in 20% of patients--and increased perspiration, headache, dry mouth, tremor and insomnia are experienced by 15 to 18% of patients. Citalopram thus offers similar therapeutic efficacy and a more favourable tolerability profile than the tricyclic antidepressants. Preliminary data suggest that it may be particularly useful in patients who cannot tolerate the anticholinergic or cardiovascular side effects of tricyclic antidepressants and in those for whom sedation is not indicated.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Ketotifen appears to be a useful agent for the management of allergic disorders and bronchial asthma, particularly in patients for whom oral therapy is preferred, and in those patients who respond, continued reduction in the frequency and severity of symptoms and the use of additional antiasthmatic drugs can be anticipated.
Abstract: Ketotifen is an orally active prophylactic agent for the management of bronchial asthma and allergic disorders. Accumulated evidence indicates that after 6 to 12 weeks of administration, ketotifen significantly reduces respiratory symptoms and the need for concomitant antiasthmatic drugs in about 70% and 50%, respectively, of patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma. However, absolute improvement in lung function is generally slight. Ketotifen also has pronounced antihistaminic and antianaphylactic properties which result in moderate to marked symptom improvement in the majority of patients with atopic dermatitis, seasonal or perennial rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, chronic or acute urticaria or food allergy. Comparative trials with established agents--notably sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) in asthma and histamine H1-antagonists in allergic disorders--indicate that ketotifen has comparable clinical utility. Unlike inhaled sodium cromoglycate, ketotifen ameliorates the symptoms of asthma, rhinitis and dermatitis when present together in atopic patients. Patient acceptance of ketotifen is good, although sedation can be troublesome in older children and adults for the initial 2 weeks of treatment. Weight gain is another notable effect in a small percentage of patients. Thus, ketotifen appears to be a useful agent for the management of allergic disorders and bronchial asthma, particularly in patients for whom oral therapy is preferred. Although a lengthy run-in period is needed in the treatment of asthma, in those patients who respond, continued reduction in the frequency and severity of symptoms and in the use of additional antiasthmatic drugs can be anticipated.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Clinical trials indicate that pamidronate is effective in a variety of conditions characterised by pathologically enhanced bone turnover, including Paget's disease, hypercalcaemia of malignancy, osteolytic bone metastasis, steroid-induced osteoporosis and idiopathic osteoporeosis.
Abstract: Pamidronate [aminohydroxypropylidene diphosphonate disodium (APD), disodium pamidronate] is an orally and intravenously active amino-substituted bisphosphonate which produces potent and specific inhibition of bone resorption at doses devoid of any significant detrimental effect on bone growth and mineralisation. Clinical trials indicate that pamidronate is effective in a variety of conditions characterised by pathologically enhanced bone turnover, including Paget's disease, hypercalcaemia of malignancy, osteolytic bone metastasis, steroid-induced osteoporosis and idiopathic osteoporosis. Pamidronate is highly effective in restoring normocalcaemia in patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy associated with bone metastases but, in common with other bisphosphonates, is marginally less effective against humoral hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Comparative studies in this area have suggested that, at therapeutic doses, pamidronate has a more pronounced calcium-lowering action than etidronate (etidronic acid) and clodronate (clodronic acid) and provides a longer period of normocalcaemic remission. In Paget's disease arrest and, in some patients, reversal of the progression of osteolytic lesions by pamidronate is associated with a sustained reduction in bone pain, improved mobility and a possible reduced risk of bone fracture. In patients with osteolytic bone metastasis pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity and slows the progression of metastatic bone destruction. Long term use of low-dose pamidronate in conjunction with conventional antiosteoporotic therapy may halt bone loss in steroid-induced and idiopathic osteoporosis. Pamidronate appears to represent a valuable addition to the drugs currently available for the treatment of symptomatic Paget's disease and cancer-associated hypercalcaemia, and shows promise in the treatment of osteolytic bone metastasis and osteoporosis.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: A review of recent data on platelet activating factor (PAF) and PAF antagonists from 1988 to the present can be found in this article, where a new concept on the interaction between PAF and various cytokines could be recognized as an important mechanism of action of the phospholipid mediator, suggesting the existence of an autocatalytic feedback network through which PAF can influence cellular function under certain pathophysiological conditions.
Abstract: This review is an attempt to summarise recent data on platelet activating factor (PAF) and PAF antagonists from 1988 to the present. This period saw a burst in research activity focused predominantly on the effect of PAF in various organs. The effect of PAF and its antagonists was further intensively studied in vitro on isolated platelets, leucocytes, macrophages and endothelial cells. From these and earlier data, based on the catastrophe theory of Thom and Zeeman, a new concept on the interaction between PAF and various cytokines could be recognised as an important mechanism of action of the phospholipid mediator, suggesting the existence of an autocatalytic feedback network through which PAF can influence cellular function under certain pathophysiological conditions. This mechanism can be regarded as the culmination of our recent knowledge on the role of PAF, and may influence the possible clinical implications of PAF antagonists in the near future. It is recognised that PAF is released in shock and ischaemic states, and that PAF antagonists can protect the heart and brain against ischaemic injury. Therefore, in contrast to the previous period, which was predominantly devoted to the elucidation of the role of PAF in immediate hypersensitivity reactions, studies performed on cerebral, myocardial and intestinal ischaemia as well as in various shock conditions have concentrated on entirely new aspects of the effect of PAF antagonists, emphasising the significance of the inflammatory process and cell-to-cell interactions in these pathophysiological states. This has led to a re-evaluation of the experimental data previously accumulated. At the same time, these new trends in PAF and PAF antagonist research have explored further possibilities for the application of PAF antagonists in clinical practice. Attention has been focused on the physiological role of PAF as a signal molecule, especially between the neuroendocrine system and related sensory organs. The recognition of the significance of PAF in mammalian reproduction is fascinating and may lead to new clinical applications of PAF antagonists. It appears probable that, like eicosanoids, PAF is involved in a great variety of membrane-dependent processes that play a fundamental role in the maintenance of homeostasis. PAF research has provided several potent natural and synthetic antagonists which may facilitate the clinical application of these drugs in the near future.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: The agonist-antagonist opioid analgesics are a heterogeneous group of drugs with moderate to strong analgesic activity comparable to that of the pure agonist opioids such as codeine and morphine but with a limited effective dose range.
Abstract: The agonist-antagonist opioid analgesics are a heterogeneous group of drugs with moderate to strong analgesic activity comparable to that of the pure agonist opioids such as codeine and morphine but with a limited effective dose range. The group includes drugs which act as an agonist or partial agonist at one receptor and an antagonist at another (pentazocine, butorphanol, nalbuphine, dezocine) and drugs acting as a partial agonist at a single receptor (buprenorphine). These drugs can be classified as nalorphine-like or morphine-like. Meptazinol does not fit into either classification and occupies a separate category

Journal ArticleDOI
01 May 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Topical azelaic acid, employed either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatments, is likely to prove of value in the management of acne and several hyperpigmentary disorders, most notably melasma.
Abstract: Azelaic acid is a naturally occurring saturated dicarboxylic acid which, on topical application (usually as a 20% cream), has been shown to be effective in the treatment of comedonal acne and inflammatory (papulopustular, nodular and nodulocystic) acne, as well as various cutaneous hyperpigmentary disorders characterised by hyperactive/abnormal melanocyte function, including melasma and, possibly, lentigo maligna. In addition, azelaic acid has an antiproliferative and cytotoxic effect on the human malignant melanocyte, and preliminary findings indicate that it may arrest the progression of cutaneous malignant melanoma. The mechanism of this selective cytotoxic action of azelaic acid is unclear, but may possibly be related to its inhibition of mitochondrial oxidoreductase activity and DNA synthesis. In controlled studies, topical azelaic acid demonstrated comparable anti-acne efficacy to topical tretinoin, benzoyl peroxide, erythromycin and oral tetracycline, while in patients with melasma azelaic acid proved at least as effective as topical hydroquinone. On topical application azelaic acid is well tolerated, with adverse effects apparently limited to a generally mild and transient local cutaneous irritation. Thus, topical azelaic acid, employed either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatments, is likely to prove of value in the management of acne and several hyperpigmentary disorders, most notably melasma.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: The role of ifosfamide/ mesna in refractory germ cell testicular cancer is clearly defined; however, its overall place in the treatment of other forms of cancer awaits delineation in future well-controlled comparative studies.
Abstract: Ifosfamide is an oxazaphosphorine alkylating agent with a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activity. It is a prodrug metabolised in the liver by cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidase enzymes to isofosforamide mustard, the active alkylating compound. Mesna, a uroprotective thiol agent, is routinely administered concomitantly with ifosfamide, and has almost eliminated ifosfamide-induced haemorrhagic cystitis and has reduced nephron toxicity. Therapeutic studies, mostly noncomparative in nature, have demonstrated the efficacy of ifosfamide/mesna alone, or more commonly as a component of combination regimens, in a variety of cancers. In patients with relapsed or refractory disseminated nonseminomatous testicular cancer, a salvage regimen of ifosfamide/mesna, cisplatin and either etoposide or vinblastine produced complete response in approximately one-quarter of patients. As a component of both induction and salvage chemotherapeutic regimens, ifosfamide/mesna has produced favourable response rates in small cell lung cancer, paediatric solid tumours, non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's lymphoma, and ovarian cancer. Induction therapy with ifosfamide/mesna-containing chemotherapeutic regimens has been encouraging in non-small cell lung cancer, adult soft-tissue sarcomas, and as neoadjuvant therapy in advanced cervical cancer. As salvage therapy, ifosfamide/mesna-containing combinations have a palliative role in advanced breast cancer and advanced cervical cancer. Ifosfamide/mesna can elicit responses in patients refractory to numerous other antineoplastic drugs, including cyclophosphamide. With administration of concomitant mesna to protect against ifosfamide-induced urotoxicity, the principal dose-limiting toxicity of ifosfamide is myelosuppression; leucopenia is generally more severe than thrombocytopenia. Reversible CNS adverse effects ranging from mild somnolence and confusion to severe encephalopathy and coma can occur in approximately 10 to 20% of patients after intravenous infusion, and the incidence of neurotoxicity may be increased to 50% after oral administration because of differences in the preferential route of metabolism between the 2 routes of administration. Other adverse effects of ifosfamide include nephrotoxicity, alopecia, and nausea/vomiting. In general, intravenously administered mesna is associated with a low incidence of adverse effects; however, gastrointestinal disturbances are common following oral administration. Thus, ifosfamide/mesna is an important and worthwhile addition to the currently available range of chemotherapeutic agents. It has a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activity and causes less marked myelosuppression than many other cytotoxic agents. At present, the role of ifosfamide/mesna in refractory germ cell testicular cancer is clearly defined; however, its overall place in the treatment of other forms of cancer awaits delineation in future well-controlled comparative studies.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: After many years of clinical usage atenolol is a well established treatment option in several areas of cardiovascular medicine such as mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina pectoris and has shown potential in the treatment of some cardiac arrhythmias and has been associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension and with myocardial infarction.
Abstract: Atenolol is a selective beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a duration of activity of at least 24 hours. The scope of therapeutic use of the drug has been expanded and become better defined since it was first reviewed in the Journal in 1979. Atenolol is effective and generally well tolerated in patients with all grades of hypertension. Data from comparative studies show that when administered orally, atenolol reduces blood pressure to a similar extent, and in a similar proportion of patients, as usual therapeutic doses of other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (such as acebutolol, celiprolol, betaxolol, indenolol, metoprolol, nadolol, pindolol, propranolol, tertatolol), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (e.g. captopril, enalapril and lisinopril), calcium antagonists (e.g. amlodipine, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, nitrendipine, nifedipine, verapamil), doxazosin, ketanserin and alpha-methyldopa. Atenolol effectively lowers blood pressure in elderly patients with hypertension and in women with hypertension associated with pregnancy, and improves objective and subjective indices in patients with stable angina pectoris. Oral atenolol is used for preventing recurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias once control is achieved by intravenous administration of atenolol. Early intervention with intravenous atenolol followed by oral maintenance therapy reduces infarct recurrence and cardiovascular mortality in patients with known or suspected myocardial infarction. There is also encouraging evidence of reduced mortality from cardiovascular disease during long term therapy with atenolol in patients with hypertension. Atenolol is well tolerated in most patients. Increases in plasma levels of both total triglycerides and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglycerides have accompanied atenolol therapy although the clinical relevance, if any, of longer term metabolic effects has yet to be determined. Its low lipid solubility and limited brain penetration results in a lower incidence of central nervous system effects than that associated with propranolol. After many years of clinical usage atenolol is a well established treatment option in several areas of cardiovascular medicine such as mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina pectoris. Furthermore, it has also shown potential in the treatment of some cardiac arrhythmias and has been associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension and in patients with myocardial infarction.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron (GRF-38032F, odanserin), granisetron(BRL-43694), tropisetton (ICS-205930), MDL-72222 and MDL73147EF, batanopride (BMY-25801-01) and several others is at various stages of investigation.
Abstract: The serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) antagonists, which bind at the type 3 receptor (5-HT3 receptor), have been evaluated in several preclinical models and found to be effective in alleviating cancer therapy-related emesis. The antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron (GRF-38032F, odanserin), granisetron (BRL-43694), tropisetron (ICS-205930), MDL-72222 and MDL-73147EF, batanopride (BMY-25801-01) and several others is at various stages of investigation. Ondansetron is currently marketed in several countries and the same will soon be true for granisetron. At this stage it is not yet possible to evaluate the comparative efficacy of each of these compounds, although recent preclinical data reveal some differences in the affinity of these compounds, for other receptors. Side effects related to these agents have been minor, consisting mainly of slight headaches; possible rises in liver enzymes related to some compounds need further evaluation. Future studies will need to determine the exact role of 5-HT3 antagonists, although their cost may confine their use to patients at high risk for side effects from metoclopramide.


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: The antihypercholesterolaemic effects of pravastatin were superior to those of bezafibrate and clinofibrate, and were similar toThose of simvastatin, lovastsatin, gemfibrozil and cholestyramine although in some studies a trend towards a superior effect with pravastsatin was seen.
Abstract: Pravastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which reduces plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting de novo cholesterol synthesis and increasing the receptor-mediated catabolism of low density lipoprotein (LDL). Several large multicentre placebo-controlled trials have shown that pravastatin reduces total and LDL-cholesterol levels in a dose-proportional manner in patients with familial or nonfamilial hypercholesterolaemia. Reductions in LDL-cholesterol levels reported in the largest study were 18% (10 mg/day), 23% (20 mg/day) and 31% (40 mg/day) after 12 weeks. Once-daily administration appears to be as effective as two daily doses. Pravastatin consistently increases HDL-cholesterol levels and decreases levels of total triglycerides but these changes are not dose dependent. At the study dosages used, the antihypercholesterolaemic effects of pravastatin were superior to those of bezafibrate and clinofibrate, and were similar to those of simvastatin, lovastatin, gemfibrozil and cholestyramine although in some studies a trend towards a superior effect with pravastatin was seen. Pravastatin did not reduce HDL-cholesterol like probucol, or increase triglyceride levels like cholestyramine. Combined treatment with pravastatin and cholestyramine or colestipol enhances the cholesterol-lowering effects of either drug administered alone and offsets the increase in total triglyceride levels seen with cholestyramine or colestipol therapy. Pravastatin is well tolerated during treatment of up to 24 months but longer term tolerability has not yet been established. The effect of provastatin on cardiovascular events related to elevated plasma cholesterol levels is under investation in several large scale regression and primary and secondary prevention trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor should rapidly find an important place as an adjunct to cancer chemotherapy, and also appears to have substantial potential in a number of other neutropenic conditions which are currently difficult to treat.
Abstract: Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) is a glycoprotein hormone which has been produced in mammalian cells and, in a nonglycosylated form, in the bacterium Escherichia coli through recombinant DNA technology. It stimulates proliferation, differentiation and activation of cells of the neutrophil-granulocyte lineage and has been investigated as therapy for patients with various neutropenic conditions, both iatrogenic and disease related. rG-CSF is well tolerated, the most frequently reported adverse effect being mild to moderate bone pain. A major use for rG-CSF therapy will be in ameliorating the neutropenia which follows cytoreductive chemotherapy. rG-CSF accelerates neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy, leading to a reduction in duration of the neutropenic phase. Consequently, infection rate is diminished, as is the associated usage of antibiotics and duration of hospitalisation. The implications are that rG-CSF may allow increased dose intensity and stricter adherence to chemotherapy schedules. The increase in neutrophils produced by rG-CSF renders it a useful treatment for conditions such as congenital, acquired and cyclic neutropenias for which current therapy is not very successful. rG-CSF may be an effective therapy in myelodysplasia, although there is concern about acceleration of the possible rate of conversion of this disease to acute myelogenous leukaemia. It is also likely that rG-CSF will be useful in accelerating the recovery of transplanted bone marrow in patients with leukaemia, lymphoma and solid tumour. Furthermore, there is great potential for expansion of the role of rG-CSF as monotherapy or in combination regimens with other cell factors in various haematological disorders such as aplastic anaemia. In summary, while many aspects of its use remain to be clarified, rG-CSF must be seen as an exciting advance in therapeutics. It should rapidly find an important place as an adjunct to cancer chemotherapy, and also appears to have substantial potential in a number of other neutropenic conditions which are currently difficult to treat.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Flumazenil enhances recovery and allows more rapid discharge of patients sedated with benzodiazepines for diagnostic procedures and facilitates management of patients during the initial recovery period following general anaesthesia supplemented with benzdiazepines, but does not preclude normal monitoring during the recovery period.
Abstract: Flumazenil is a specific benzodiazepine antagonist which is indicated when the central effects of a benzodiazepine need to be attenuated or terminated. Following intravenous administration of up to 1 mg, flumazenil effectively reverses sedation and improves psychomotor performance following administration of short and longer acting benzodiazepines used for sedation, or general anaesthesia supplemented with benzodiazepines. The duration of action is short at generally 30 to 60 minutes and supplemental doses of flumazenil may be needed to maintain the desired level of consciousness in some patients. After poisoning with high dosages of benzodiazepines alone or combined with other drugs, the initial single dose of flumazenil will require supplementing with repeated low intravenous doses or an infusion to maintain wakefulness. In such patients, flumazenil also facilitates differential diagnosis and reduces the necessity for interventions. Flumazenil thus enhances recovery and allows more rapid discharge of patients sedated with benzodiazepines for diagnostic procedures and facilitates management of patients during the initial recovery period following general anaesthesia supplemented with benzodiazepines, but does not preclude normal monitoring during the recovery period. Flumazenil is clearly very useful in treating drug poisoning when benzodiazepines are a major component. By virtue of its specific benzodiazepine antagonist effects, flumazenil provides an innovative and well tolerated approach in clinical situations requiring rapid reversal of benzodiazepine-induced central nervous system depressant effects.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Ondansetron is a promising new agent for prophylaxis against nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and may be particularly useful in young and elderly patients who are more susceptible to extrapyramidal symptoms induced by high dose metoclopramide.
Abstract: Ondansetron (GR 38032F) is a highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, one of a new class of compounds which may have several therapeutic applications. Animal and clinical studies show that ondansetron reduces the 24-hour incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting induced by cytotoxic drugs, including cisplatin, and by single exposure, high dose radiation. Ondansetron is more effective than high dose metoclopramide in the 24 hours following chemotherapy, and preliminary clinical evidence suggests that it is equally effective in the following 4 days. It is also more effective than the 'moderate' doses of metoclopramide used to suppress emesis following radiotherapy. The antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron is enhanced by dexamethasone in cisplatin-treated patients. Importantly, extrapyramidal effects have not been reported with ondansetron. Further comparisons are required with standard combination antiemetic therapy to complement the data presently available. Thus, ondansetron is a promising new agent for prophylaxis against nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It may be particularly useful in young and elderly patients who are more susceptible to extrapyramidal symptoms induced by high dose metoclopramide. With its improved tolerability and clinical response profiles, ondansetron represents an important advance in a difficult area of therapeutics.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Evaluation of its role in improving symptom control in patients failing to respond to prophylactic therapy, and clarification of the optimal role of beta 2-agonists in asthma maintenance therapy are required to fully determine the value of formoterol in the management of obstructive airways disease.
Abstract: Formoterol, a long-acting beta 2-selective adrenoceptor agonist, produces dose-proportional bronchodilation in patients with obstructive airways disease with a reversible component. A significant effect occurs within minutes of inhalation of a therapeutic formoterol dose and persists for approximately 12 hours. Oral formoterol has a slower onset of action than the inhaled formulations, but also produces prolonged bronchodilatory effects. Inhaled formoterol has shown a therapeutic efficacy equivalent to or better than comparable dosages of the conventional beta 2-agonists salbutamol, fenoterol and terbutaline in short and long term trials, in both adults and children with asthma. Its prolonged duration of action permits a twice-daily dosage regimen and results in improved control of nocturnal symptoms by reducing the 'morning dip'. Formoterol also compares well with oral slow release theophylline. In addition, significantly more patients with chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD) had an improvement in symptoms when treated with formoterol compared with salbutamol or fenoterol. Noncomparative studies indicate formoterol also provides effective prophylaxis of exercise-induced asthma. Development of tachyphylaxis has not been observed. Formoterol is generally well tolerated. Adverse effects observed represent predictable extensions of its pharmacology. Tremor and palpitations are most frequently reported. The incidence of adverse events is dose-proportional and therefore related to the route of administration, being more frequent following oral than inhalation therapy. The long-acting beta 2-agonists, including formoterol, represent a significant advance over current maintenance or prophylactic bronchodilator therapy with intermediate-acting beta 2-agonists such as salbutamol, fenoterol and terbutaline, predominantly because of the twice daily administration regimen. However, comparisons with other long-acting beta 2-agonists, such as salmeterol, evaluation of its role in improving symptom control in patients failing to respond to prophylactic therapy, and clarification of the optimal role of beta 2-agonists in asthma maintenance therapy are required to fully determine the value of formoterol in the management of obstructive airways disease.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: With sensible guidelines, and in the context of a multidisciplinary pain clinic, opioids may provide the only hope of relief to many sufferers of chronic pain.
Abstract: Inadequately treated acute and chronic pain remains a major cause of suffering, in spite of enormous advances in pharmacology and technology Opioids provide a powerful, versatile, widely available means of managing this pain, but their use is too often restrained by ignorance and mistaken fears of addiction The management of postoperative pain (perhaps the most common form of acute pain) is traditionally attempted with fixed dosages of analgesics by relatively unpredictable routes (eg oral, rectal and intramuscular) Intravenous opioid infusions (an improvement) risk respiratory depression and require close monitoring and titration Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), by contrast, permits the most efficacious medication (pure opioid agonist) by the optimal route (intravenous) under direct control of the patient, and provides high levels of satisfaction and safety Ideally, any opioid use should be integrated with a wide spectrum of other analgesic modalities in an anaesthesiology-based ‘acute pain service’ The use of opioids for chronic pain of nonmalignant origin remains controversial There is a perceived conflict between patients’ interests and those of society However, problems (such as tolerance, physical dependence, addiction and chronic toxicity), anticipated from experience with animal experiments and pain-free abusers, seldom cause difficulties when opioids are used appropriately to treat pain (so-called’ dual pharmacology’) With sensible guidelines, and in the context of a multidisciplinary pain clinic, opioids may provide the only hope of relief to many sufferers of chronic pain

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used high-dose acyclovir that is administered at 20 mg/kg/every 8 h for 14-21 days for 6 months.
Abstract: Herpes simplex virus infections of the central nervous system are associated with significant morbidity in spite of efficacious antiviral therapy. Herpes simplex virus, type 1 (HSV-1), causes focal neurologic findings that are characteristic of temporal lobe localization. Herpes simplex encephalitis occurs in a biphasic age distribution with one-third of the cases less than 20 and the majority of remaining cases over 50. The diagnostic test of choice is the detection of HSV DNA by PCR in the cerebrospinal fluid. Acyclovir is the treatment of choice and is administered for 14–21 days intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 8 h. Neonatal HSV infections are more frequently caused by HSV-2 than HSV-1, although the number of cases of the latter is increasing. Infection is most frequently acquired intrapartum by contact with infected maternal genital secretions. Approximately 50 % of all newborns with neonatal infection will have central nervous system involvement. Importantly, HSV-2 infections of the central nervous system in neonates have a poorer outcome than those attributable to HSV-1. Therapy of neonatal infection is achieved with high-dose acyclovir that is administered at 20 mg/kg/every 8 h for 14–21 days. Six months of oral acyclovir post-intravenous treatment has resulted in an improved neurologic outcome for children with central nervous system infection. Likely, in the future, combination antiviral approaches will be employed for both adult and pediatric disease in order to improve neurologic outcome.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Although levocabastine appears to be less effective than the topical corticosteroid beclomethasone with regard to relieving runny and blocked nose, further comparative trials between these 2 agents would be desirable.
Abstract: Levocabastine is a long acting, highly potent and selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist, which has been developed for nasal and ocular administration. In controlled trials performed to date levocabastine was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis. Comparative studies have demonstrated that levocabastine is superior to placebo and at least as effective as sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) in alleviating symptoms associated with seasonal allergic conditions. Although levocabastine appears to be less effective than the topical corticosteroid beclomethasone with regard to relieving runny and blocked nose, further comparative trials between these 2 agents would be desirable. Similar to other antihistamines, levocabastine provides minimal relief of nasal blockage, but this symptom is believed to be mediated by receptors other than histamine H1. The prompt onset of antiallergic activity after application differentiates levocabastine from the reference topical antiallergic, sodium cromoglycate, which has an onset of efficacy characterised by a lag period, thereby necessitating maintenance treatment. The incidence of adverse effects associated with levocabastine therapy is low and is similar to that observed with placebo and sodium cromoglycate. Levocabastine provides prophylactic protection as well as acute relief from nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with seasonal allergic disorders. With the ever increasing trend towards topical therapy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis, levocabastine is a useful addition to the range of drugs currently available. Possible avenues for additional research should include determining whether the antiallergic efficacy of topical levocabastine is superior to that of oral agents such as astemizole and terfenadine, and whether topical therapy is indeed preferred, considering the relative ease of administration of effective oral antiallergic agents.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 1991-Drugs
TL;DR: Ivermectin is suitable for inclusion in mass treatment programmes and is the best therapeutic option presently available to combat onchocerciasis, and represents a major contribution to tropical medicine.
Abstract: Ivermectin, a derivative of avermectin B, is an orally effective microfilaricidal agent. It is the current drug of choice for treating patients infected with the nematode Onchocerca volvulus, which is a major cause of blindness in inhabitants of some tropical areas. Ivermectin is administered orally as a single dose of 150 micrograms/kg given annually. Skin and ocular microfilarial counts are dramatically reduced after the first dose, with some evidence for a resulting decrease in transmission of infection by the blackfly vector. With the exception of rare serious reactions such as severe systemic postural hypotension, ivermectin is generally well tolerated. The drug has the clear advantages of ease of administration and better tolerability compared with diethylcarbamazine and suramin, agents previously used to treat onchocerciasis. Thus, ivermectin is suitable for inclusion in mass treatment programmes and is the best therapeutic option presently available to combat onchocerciasis. As such it provides hope for many thousands of people at risk of becoming blind, and represents a major contribution to tropical medicine.