scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1541-5015

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 

Purdue University Press
About: Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning is an academic journal published by Purdue University Press. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Problem-based learning & Teaching method. It has an ISSN identifier of 1541-5015. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 234 publications have been published receiving 11535 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This overview presents a brief history, followed by a discussion of the similarities and differences between PBL and other experiential approaches to teaching, and identifies some of the challenges that lie ahead for PBL.
Abstract: Problem-based learning (PBL) is an instructional approach that has been used successfully for over 30 years and continues to gain acceptance in multiple disciplines. It is an instructional (and curricular) learner-centered approach that empowers learners to conduct research, integrate theory and practice, and apply knowledge and skills to develop a viable solution to a defined problem. This overview presents a brief history, followed by a discussion of the similarities and differences between PBL and other experiential approaches to teaching, and identifies some of the challenges that lie ahead for PBL.

2,231 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a qualitative meta-synthesis approach was used to compare and contrast the assumptions and fi ndings of the meta-analytical research on the eff ectiveness of PBL.
Abstract: Problem-based learning (PBL) has been utilized for over 40 years in a variety of diff erent disciplines. Although extensively researched, there is heated debate about the eff ectiveness of PBL. Several meta-analyses have been conducted that provide a synthesis of the eff ects of PBL in comparison to traditional forms of instruction. This study used a qualitative meta-synthesis approach to compare and contrast the assumptions and fi ndings of the meta-analytical research on the eff ectiveness of PBL. Findings indicated that PBL was superior when it comes to long-term retention, skill development and satisfaction of students and teachers, while traditional approaches were more eff ective for short-term retention as measured by standardized board exams. Implications are discussed.

818 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an analysis of facilitation of a student-centered problem-based learning group was performed through interaction analysis using video data and stimulated recall to examine two PBL group meetings, and specific strategies were used to support the PBL goals of help ing students construct causal explanations, reason effectively, and become self-directed learners while maintaining a student centered learning process.
Abstract: This paper describes an analysis of facilitation of a student-centered problem-based learning group. The focus of this analysis was to understand the goals and strategies of an expert facilitator in support of collaborative learning. This was accomplished through interaction analysis using video data and stimulated recall to examine two PBL group meetings. In this paper, we examine how specific strategies were used to support the PBL goals of help ing students construct causal explanations, reason effectively, and become self-directed learners while maintaining a student-centered learning process. Being able to articulate these strategies is an important step in helping others learn the art of PBL facilitation.

645 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article conducted a meta-analysis of problem-based learning across 82 studies and 201 outcomes and found that the majority favor PBL (dw = 0.13, +/.025) with a lack of homogeneity (Q = 954.27) that warrants a closer examination of moderating factors.
Abstract: Problem based learning (PBL) in its most current form originated in Medical Education but has since been used in a variety of disciplines (Savery & Duff y, 1995) at a variety of educational levels (Savery, 2006). Although recent meta analyses have been conducted (Dochy, Segers, Van den Bossche, & Gijbels, 2003; Gijbels, Dochy, Van den Bossche, & Segers, 2005) that attempted to go beyond medical education, they found only one study in economics and were unable to explain large portions of the variance across results. This work builds upon their eff orts as a meta-analysis that crosses disciplines as well as categorizes the types of problems used (Jonassen, 2000), the PBL approach employed (Barrows, 1986), and the level of assessment (Gijbels et al., 2005; Sugrue, 1993, 1995). Across 82 studies and 201 outcomes the fi ndings favor PBL (dw = 0.13, +/.025) with a lack of homogeneity (Q = 954.27) that warrants a closer examination of moderating factors.

485 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Mergendoller et al. as mentioned in this paper compared the effectiveness of problem-based learning and traditional instructional approaches in developing high-school students' macroeconomics knowledge and examined whether PBL was differentially effective with students demonstrating different levels of four aptitudes: verbal ability, interest in economics, preference for group work, and problem-solving efficacy.
Abstract: Abstract This study compared the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional instructional approaches in developing high-school students’ macroeconomics knowledge and examined whether PBL was differentially effective with students demonstrating different levels of four aptitudes: verbal ability, interest in economics, preference for group work, and problem-solving efficacy. Over all, PBL was found to be a more effective instructional approach for teaching macroeconomics than traditional lecture–discussion (p = .05). Additional analyses provided evidence that PBL was more effective than traditional instruction with students of average verbal ability and below, students who were more interested in learning economics, and students who were most and least confident in their ability to solve problems. Recommended Citation Mergendoller, J. R. , Maxwell, N. L. , & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Instruction: A Comparative Study of Instructional Methods and Student Characteristics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1026  Download

334 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
20226
20216
202016
201917
201821
201729