scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1010-5182

Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery 

Elsevier BV
About: Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery is an academic journal published by Elsevier BV. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Orthognathic surgery & Temporomandibular joint. It has an ISSN identifier of 1010-5182. Over the lifetime, 4709 publications have been published receiving 117834 citations. The journal is also known as: Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: For patients sustaining facial trauma, logistic regression analyses revealed increased risks for facial bone fractures, soft tissue lesions in patients involved in traffic accidents, and dental trauma during activities of daily life and play accidents.
Abstract: Introduction: Cranio-maxillofacial trauma management requires pertinent documentation. Using a large computerized database, injury surveillance and research data describe the whole spectrum of injuries. The goal of this study was to assess the effect of the five main causes of accidents resulting in facial injury on the severity of cranio-maxillofacial trauma. Patients and Methods: During a period of 10 years (1991-2000) 9543 patients were admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Innsbruck with cranio-maxillofacial trauma. Data of patients were prospectively recorded including cause of injury, age and gender, type of injury, injury mechanisms, location and frequency of soft tissue injuries, dentoalveolar trauma, facial bone fractures and concomitant injuries. Statistical analyses performed included descriptive analysis, chi square test, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney's U test. This was followed by logistic regression analyses for the three injury types to determine the impact of the five main causes on the type of injury at different ages in facial trauma patients. Results: Five major categories/mechanisms of injury existed: in 3613 (38%) cases it was activity of daily life, in 2991 (31%) sports, 1170 (12%) violence, in 1116 (12%) traffic accidents, in 504 (5%) work accidents and in 149 (2%) other causes. A total of 3578 patients (37.5%) had 7061 facial bone fractures, 4763 patients (49.9%) suffered from 6237 dentoalveolar, and 5968 patients (62.5%) from 7769 soft tissue injuries. Gender distribution showed an overall male-to-female ratio of 2.1 to 1 and the mean age was 25.8±19.9 years; but both varied greatly depending on the injury mechanism (facial bone fractures: 35.4±19.5 years, higher risk for males; soft tissue injuries: 28.7±20.5, no gender preference; dentoalveolar trauma: 18±15.6, elevated risk for females). For patients sustaining facial trauma, logistic regression analyses revealed increased risks for facial bone fractures (225%), soft tissue lesions (58%) in patients involved in traffic accidents, and dental trauma (49%) during activities of daily life and play accidents. When compared with other causes, the probability of suffering soft tissue injuries and dental trauma, but not facial bone fractures, is higher in sports-related accidents, 12 and 16%, respectively. Conclusion: This study differentiated between injury mechanisms in cranio-maxillofacial trauma. The specially trained surgeons treating cranio-maxillofacial trauma are the primary source of information for the public and legislators on implementing preventive measures for high-risk activities. In facial trauma, older persons are prone to bone fractures (increase of 4.4%/year of age) and soft tissue injuries (increase of 2%/year of age) while younger persons are more susceptible to dentoalveolar trauma (decrease of 4.5%/year of age).

787 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The postoperative course was uneventful and CT-scans showed new bone formation and near complete calvarial continuity three months after the reconstruction, which resulted in an unstable skull with marked bony defects.
Abstract: This is a report of a 7-year-old girl suffering from widespread calvarial defects after severe head injury with multifragment calvarial fractures, decompressive craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension and replantation of cryopreserved skull fragments. Chronic infection resulted in an unstable skull with marked bony defects. Two years after the initial injury the calvarial defects were repaired. Due to the limited amount of autologous cancellous bone available from the iliac crest, autologous adipose derived stem cells were processed simultaneously and applied to the calvarial defects in a single operative procedure. The stem cells were kept in place using autologous fibrin glue. Mechanical fixation was achieved by two large, resorbable macroporous sheets acting as a soft tissue barrier at the same time. The postoperative course was uneventful and CT-scans showed new bone formation and near complete calvarial continuity three months after the reconstruction.

632 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The use of checklists like PRISMA is likely to improve the reporting quality of a systematic review and provides substantial transparency in the selection process of papers in a systematicreview.
Abstract: Publication bias is a major problem in evidence based medicine. As well as positive outcome studies being preferentially published or followed by full text publication authors are also more likely to publish positive results in English-language journals. This unequal distribution of trials leads to a selection bias in evidence l level studies, like systematic reviews, meta-analysis or health technology assessments followed by a systematic failure of interpretation and in clinical decisions. Publication bias in a systematic review occurs mostly during the selection process and a transparent selection process is necessary to avoid such bias. For systematic reviews/meta-analysis the PRISMA-statement (formerly known as QUOROM) is recommended, as it gives the reader for a better understanding of the selection process. In the future the use of trial registration for minimizing publication bias, mechanisms to allow easier access to the scientific literature and improvement in the peer review process are recommended to overcome publication bias. The use of checklists like PRISMA is likely to improve the reporting quality of a systematic review and provides substantial transparency in the selection process of papers in a systematic review.

590 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There was substantial variation in the growth factor content of platelet-rich plasma, and the factors influencing this are still worthy of further investigation.
Abstract: Introduction: Platelet-rich plasma contains autologous thrombocyte growth factors and might be promising for acceleration of dentoalveolar bone regeneration. In this study, it was analysed for platelet counts and growth factor concentrations. Material and method: Platelet-rich plasma was isolated by discontinuous cell separation from 158 healthy men and 55 women aged 17–62 years. One hundred and fifteen specimens (stratified for age and gender of the donor) were analysed for growth factor concentrations and platelet count. Results: The platelet count in platelet-rich plasma (1,407,640±320,100/μl) was 5 times higher than in donor blood (266,040±60,530/μl). Platelet-derived growth factor AB (117±63 ng/ml), transforming growth factor (TGF) β -1 (169±84 ng/ml), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I (84±23 ng/ml) were found in large amounts, while platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) BB (10±8 ng/ml) and transforming growth factor β -2 (0.4±0.3 ng/ml) were found in small amounts only. The growth factor content was not well correlated with the platelet count in whole blood nor with the platelet-rich plasma ( r p =0.35). No influence of gender or age on platelet count or growth factor concentrations was discovered (except IGF-I). Conclusions: While there was substantial variation in the growth factor content of platelet-rich plasma, the factors influencing this are still worthy of further investigation. Furthermore, a technique whereby the growth factor content could be rapidly assessed in platelet-rich plasma may be of therapeutic benefit. Copyright 2002 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

579 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of the principles of bone replacement, the types of graft materials available, and future perspectives are presented and a change from a simple replacement material to an individually created composite biomaterial with osteoinductive properties to enable enhanced defect bridging is proposed.
Abstract: An autologous bone graft is still the ideal material for the repair of craniofacial defects, but its availability is limited and harvesting can be associated with complications. Bone replacement materials as an alternative have a long history of success. With increasing technological advances the spectrum of grafting materials has broadened to allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials, providing material specific advantages. A large number of bone-graft substitutes are available including allograft bone preparations such as demineralized bone matrix and calcium-based materials. More and more replacement materials consist of one or more components: an osteoconductive matrix, which supports the ingrowth of new bone; and osteoinductive proteins, which sustain mitogenesis of undifferentiated cells; and osteogenic cells (osteoblasts or osteoblast precursors), which are capable of forming bone in the proper environment. All substitutes can either replace autologous bone or expand an existing amount of autologous bone graft. Because an understanding of the properties of each material enables individual treatment concepts this review presents an overview of the principles of bone replacement, the types of graft materials available, and considers future perspectives. Bone substitutes are undergoing a change from a simple replacement material to an individually created composite biomaterial with osteoinductive properties to enable enhanced defect bridging.

378 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202363
202285
2021182
2020150
2019267
2018268