Journal•ISSN: 1542-4065
Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries
Taylor & Francis
About: Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Medical library & Computer science. It has an ISSN identifier of 1542-4065. Over the lifetime, 458 publications have been published receiving 2884 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this article , Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th edition, were presented for research design in the field of medical librarianship, including qualitative, quantitative, and qualitative approaches.
Abstract: "Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th Edition." Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1-2), pp. 54–55
315 citations
TL;DR: The National Library of Medicine's Drugs and Lactation Database is an essential resource for any health care professional treating or answering the questions of breastfeeding women.
Abstract: The National Library of Medicine's Drugs and Lactation Database is an essential resource for any health care professional treating or answering the questions of breastfeeding women. It is available to anyone free of charge online through the TOXNET platform.
205 citations
TL;DR: The citation analysis potential of four databases is compared: Web of Science, Scopus, SciFinder, and Google Scholar; each database presents its own strengths and weaknesses, including methods of analysis, differences in coverage, and means of linking references.
Abstract: In recent years, numerous articles have compared the coverage, features, and citation analysis capabilities of Scopus™ and Google Scholar with Web of Science®, a Web-based version of Science Citation Index. This article goes a step further and compares the citation analysis potential of four databases: Web of Science, Scopus, SciFinder, and Google Scholar. Each database presents its own strengths and weaknesses, including methods of analysis, differences in coverage, and means of linking references. As an illustration, Web of Science provides coverage back to 1900. In contrast, Scopus only has completed citation information from 1996 onward, yet Scopus provides better coverage of clinical medicine and nursing than Web of Science. SciFinder has the strongest coverage of chemistry and the natural sciences, while Google Scholar has the capability to link citation information to individual references. Although Scopus and Web of Science provide comprehensive citation reports, all databases miss linking to some...
185 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe wearable technology and wearable devices as phrases that describe electronics and computers that are integrated into clothing and other accessories that can be worn comfortably on the body.
Abstract: “Wearable technology” and “wearable devices” are phrases that describe electronics and computers that are integrated into clothing and other accessories that can be worn comfortably on the body. Ex...
158 citations
TL;DR: This is an introduction to the landscape of cloud computing, the characteristics by which it is defined, and its strengths and its weaknesses.
Abstract: Cloud computing is not a brand new type of computing, but it is emerging in the mainstream as a powerful and important force of change in the way we manage information and consume and provide information services. This is an introduction to the landscape of cloud computing, the characteristics by which it is defined, and its strengths and its weaknesses. This is also an initial foray into the life of the cloud for medical libraries, a foray that will be completed in follow-up columns.
96 citations