scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 2057-3170

Journal of Global Security Studies 

Oxford University Press
About: Journal of Global Security Studies is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Poison control & International security. It has an ISSN identifier of 2057-3170. Over the lifetime, 260 publications have been published receiving 1637 citations.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper examined the foreign policy responses of three major host states, namely Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey, to the Syrian refugee crisis, and concluded that the choice of strategy depended on the size of the host state's refugee community and domestic elites' perception of their geostrategic importance vis-a-vis the target.
Abstract: How does forced migration affect the politics of host states and, in particular, how does it impact states’ foreign policy decision-making? The relevant literature on refugee politics has yet to fully explore how forced migration affects host states’ behavior. One possibility is that they will employ their position in order to extract revenue from other state or nonstate actors for maintaining refugee groups within their borders. This article explores the workings of these refugee rentier states, namely states seeking to leverage their position as host states of displaced communities for material gain. It focuses on the Syrian refugee crisis, examining the foreign policy responses of three major host states—Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey. While all three engaged in post-2011 refugee rent-seeking behavior, Jordan and Lebanon deployed a back-scratching strategy based on bargains, while Turkey deployed a blackmailing strategy based on threats. Drawing upon primary sources in English and Arabic, the article inductively examines the choice of strategy and argues that it depended on the size of the host state's refugee community and domestic elites’ perception of their geostrategic importance vis-a-vis the target. The article concludes with a discussion of these findings’ significance for understanding the international dimension of the Syrian refugee crisis and argues that they also pave the way for future research on the effects of forced displacement on host states’ political development.

93 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors call for a research program focused on the dynamics of global power politics, rather than linking realpolitik to structural-realist theoretical frameworks or the putatively anarchical character of world politics, they treat power politics as an object of analysis in its own right.
Abstract: We call for a research program focused on the dynamics of global power politics. Rather than link realpolitik to structural-realist theoretical frameworks or the putatively anarchical character of world politics, the program treats power politics as an object of analysis in its own right. It embraces debate over the nature of global power politics among scholars working with distinctive approaches. It sees the structural contexts of power politics as highly variable and often hierarchical in character. It attenuates ex ante commitments to the centrality of states in global politics. And it takes for granted that actors deploy multiple resources and modalities of power in their pursuit of influence. What binds this diverse research program together is its focus on realpolitik as the politics of collective mobilization in the context of the struggle for influence among political communities, broadly understood. Thus, the study of the dynamics of collective mobilization—the causal and constitutive pathways linking efforts at mobilization with enhanced power—brings together approaches to security studies in a shared study of power politics.

89 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors make the case for a "spatial turn" in the field of security studies and discuss how a socio-spatial approach can help make sense of evolving state security practices, and present examples of non-national spaces of security.
Abstract: The changing political and social meanings of space under conditions of advanced globalization point to the need to analyze security – or the deployment and management of violence -- as a socio-spatial practice. This article draws attention to the “methodological nationalist” bias that has traditionally characterized mainstream security studies, and discusses its effect on how security issues are studied and conceptualized. Building on insights from political geography and sociology, the article makes the case for a “spatial turn” in the field. It discusses how a socio-spatial approach can help make sense of evolving state security practices, and presents examples of non-national spaces of security -- including cities, cyberspace and the global polity. Such spaces are increasingly objects of security practices, but the implications of this remain largely under-theorized in security studies.

60 citations

Network Information
Related Journals (5)
International Studies Quarterly
2.1K papers, 111.5K citations
88% related
International Security
1.3K papers, 100.5K citations
84% related
International Organization
2K papers, 241.8K citations
84% related
Perspectives on Politics
3.7K papers, 103.2K citations
83% related
Journal of Conflict Resolution
2.7K papers, 175.7K citations
83% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202189
202039
201950
201831
201722
201629