Journal•ISSN: 1077-5315
The Journal of Extension
Clemson University Press
About: The Journal of Extension is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Program evaluation & Positive Youth Development. Over the lifetime, 2750 publications have been published receiving 19085 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Journal Article•
TL;DR: The differences between Lkert-type and Likert scale data are discussed and recommendations for descriptive statistics to be used during the analysis are provided and once a researcher understands the difference, the decision on appropriate statistical procedures will be apparent.
Abstract: This article provides information for Extension professionals on the correct analysis of Likert data. The analyses of Likert-type and Likert scale data require unique data analysis procedures, and as a result, misuses and/or mistakes often occur. This article discusses the differences between Likert-type and Likert scale data and provides recommendations for descriptive statistics to be used during the analysis. Once a researcher understands the difference between Likert-type and Likert scale data, the decision on appropriate statistical procedures will be apparent.
1,119 citations
Journal Article•
313 citations
Journal Article•
TL;DR: Petrzelka, Peggy, Steve Padgitt, and Wendy Wintersteen as mentioned in this paper revisited the individual consultations that provided the base from which the Cooperative Extension Service grew and maintained that continuing or reimplementing these consultations as part of Extension's portfolio for the 21st century has mutual benefit, both to the client and to Extension.
Abstract: Revisits the individual consultations that provided the base from which the Cooperative Extension Service grew. Using data gathered from clients' and Extension staff evaluations of one-on-one activities, our findings show these consultations have an economic and educational value for clients. The consultations benefit field specialists as well, augmenting their need assessments by providing information from in the field, providing opportunities for on-going research, and building credibility. It is maintained that continuing (or reimplementing) these consultations as part of Extension's portfolio for the 21st Century has mutual benefit, both to the client and to Extension. Disciplines Civic and Community Engagement | Community-Based Learning | Community-Based Research | Entomology Comments This article is published as Petrzelka, Peggy, Steve Padgitt, and Wendy Wintersteen. \"Extension’s portfolio for the 21st century: a place for one-on-one consultations’.\" Journal of Extension 37, no. 6 (1999): n6. Posted with permission. This article is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs/429 11/22/2017 Extension's Portfolio for the 21st Century: A Place for One-on-One Consultations https://www.joe.org/joe/1999december/comm1.php 1/6 JOE HOME JOURNAL GUIDELINES ABOUT JOE CONTACT NATIONAL JOB BANK Current Issue Back Issues Search Subscribe December 1999 // Volume 37 // Number 6 // Commentary // 6COM1 Extension's Portfolio for the 21st Century: A Place for One-on-One Consultations Abstract Revisits the individual consultations that provided the base from which the Cooperative Extension Service grew. Using data gathered from clients' and Extension staff evaluations of one-on-one activities, our findings show these consultations have an economic and educational value for clients. The consultations benefit field specialists as well, augmenting their need assessments by providing information from in the field, providing opportunities for on-going research, and building credibility. It is maintained that continuing (or reimplementing) these consultations as part of Extension's portfolio for the 21st Century has mutual benefit, both to the client and to Extension.Revisits the individual consultations that provided the base from which the Cooperative Extension Service grew. Using data gathered from clients' and Extension staff evaluations of one-on-one activities, our findings show these consultations have an economic and educational value for clients. The consultations benefit field specialists as well, augmenting their need assessments by providing information from in the field, providing opportunities for on-going research, and building credibility. It is maintained that continuing (or reimplementing) these consultations as part of Extension's portfolio for the 21st Century has mutual benefit, both to the client and to Extension.
296 citations