scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

015 Tracking the Impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) Effective Health Care Program through Uptake by Clinical Practice Guideline and Quality Measure Developers

TLDR
Systematic reviews and other research published through the EHC programme are being used to develop guidelines and measures that meet inclusion criteria for NGC and NQMC, and to track the uptake of AHRQ Effective Health Care outputs.
Abstract
Background Public and private funders evaluate health care investments in terms of outcomes and accountability. Citation analysis can approximate the dissemination and impact of funded research outputs. Objectives Use references in guidelines and measures represented in the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) and National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC) to track the uptake of AHRQ Effective Health Care (EHC) programme outputs. Methods 442 EHC-related titles were searched against the full-text corpus of the Clearinghouses. Documents that cited the titles were examined for the context of the citations. References were considered strong when tied to a specific metric or recommendation or noted as important to the guideline’s methodology; moderate if discussed in the body of the citing document; and weak if they appeared only in the reference list. Results 174 individual guidelines and measures cited EHC-related titles (n = 341). 50% of the guideline references were strong, 28% moderate and the remainder weak or undetermined (22%). All measure references were strong. Discussion This analysis has been done annually since 2010 with the numbers of detected citations increasing each year. The method used not only assesses whether a work was referenced in a guideline or measure, but its relative importance to the guideline or measure providing evidence of impact of the EHC programme. Implications Systematic reviews and other research published through the EHC programme are being used to develop guidelines and measures that meet inclusion criteria for NGC and NQMC. EHC reports may be downloaded and topics nominated at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer rehabilitation: syntheses of guideline recommendations and qualitative appraisals.

TL;DR: The most rigorous and comprehensive of those rated guidelines was the adult cancer pain guideline from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network as discussed by the authors, which was rated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II); wide variability was noted in rigor of development, clarity of presentation and stakeholder involvement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cognitive tests predict real-world errors: the relationship between drug name confusion rates in laboratory-based memory and perception tests and corresponding error rates in large pharmacy chains

TL;DR: There is a strong and significant association between drug name confusion error rates observed in the real world and those observed in laboratory-based tests of memory and perception, and regulators and drug companies seeking a validated preapproval method for identifying confusing drug names ought to consider using these simple tests.
Book ChapterDOI

Patients and Families as Coproducers of Safe and Reliable Outcomes

Helen Haskell, +1 more
TL;DR: The history and potential of effective coproduction as a strategy to improve patient safety and quality in surgery at both a macro and micro level are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient and caregiver engagement in the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Health Care Horizon Scanning System (HCHSS) process.

TL;DR: The horizon scanning system has successfully engaged patients and caregivers, who contributed unique and important perspectives that informed the selection of topics deemed to have high potential to disrupt clinical care.
Related Papers (5)