scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II

TLDR
This paper suggests a non-dominated sorting-based MOEA, called NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), which alleviates all of the above three difficulties, and modify the definition of dominance in order to solve constrained multi-objective problems efficiently.
Abstract
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) that use non-dominated sorting and sharing have been criticized mainly for: (1) their O(MN/sup 3/) computational complexity (where M is the number of objectives and N is the population size); (2) their non-elitism approach; and (3) the need to specify a sharing parameter. In this paper, we suggest a non-dominated sorting-based MOEA, called NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), which alleviates all of the above three difficulties. Specifically, a fast non-dominated sorting approach with O(MN/sup 2/) computational complexity is presented. Also, a selection operator is presented that creates a mating pool by combining the parent and offspring populations and selecting the best N solutions (with respect to fitness and spread). Simulation results on difficult test problems show that NSGA-II is able, for most problems, to find a much better spread of solutions and better convergence near the true Pareto-optimal front compared to the Pareto-archived evolution strategy and the strength-Pareto evolutionary algorithm - two other elitist MOEAs that pay special attention to creating a diverse Pareto-optimal front. Moreover, we modify the definition of dominance in order to solve constrained multi-objective problems efficiently. Simulation results of the constrained NSGA-II on a number of test problems, including a five-objective, seven-constraint nonlinear problem, are compared with another constrained multi-objective optimizer, and the much better performance of NSGA-II is observed.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book

Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms

TL;DR: This text provides an excellent introduction to the use of evolutionary algorithms in multi-objective optimization, allowing use as a graduate course text or for self-study.
Journal ArticleDOI

MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition

TL;DR: Experimental results have demonstrated that MOEA/D with simple decomposition methods outperforms or performs similarly to MOGLS and NSGA-II on multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problems and continuous multiobjectives optimization problems.

SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm

TL;DR: An improved version of SPEA, namely SPEA2, is proposed, which incorporates in contrast to its predecessor a fine-grained fitness assignment strategy, a density estimation technique, and an enhanced archive truncation method.
Journal ArticleDOI

Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

TL;DR: A detailed review of the basic concepts of DE and a survey of its major variants, its application to multiobjective, constrained, large scale, and uncertain optimization problems, and the theoretical studies conducted on DE so far are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints

TL;DR: A reference-point-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm that emphasizes population members that are nondominated, yet close to a set of supplied reference points is suggested that is found to produce satisfactory results on all problems considered in this paper.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms

TL;DR: Goldberg's notion of nondominated sorting in GAs along with a niche and speciation method to find multiple Pareto-optimal points simultaneously are investigated and suggested to be extended to higher dimensional and more difficult multiobjective problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results

TL;DR: This paper provides a systematic comparison of various evolutionary approaches to multiobjective optimization using six carefully chosen test functions and shows that elitism is shown to be an important factor for improving evolutionary multiobjectives search.
Journal ArticleDOI

An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms

TL;DR: GA's population-based approach and ability to make pair-wise comparison in tournament selection operator are exploited to devise a penalty function approach that does not require any penalty parameter to guide the search towards the constrained optimum.
Proceedings Article

Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization

TL;DR: A rank-based fitness assignment method for Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithms (MOGAs) and the genetic algorithm is seen as the optimizing element of a multiobjective optimization loop, which also comprises the DM.
Related Papers (5)