scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

An Even Faster and More Unifying Algorithm for Comparing Trees via Unbalanced Bipartite Matchings

TLDR
In this article, the authors presented an algorithm for comparing trees that are labeled in an arbitrary manner, which is faster than the previous algorithms and is at the core of their maximum agreement subtree algorithm.
Abstract
A widely used method for determining the similarity of two labeled trees is to compute a maximum agreement subtree of the two trees. Previous work on this similarity measure is only concerned with the comparison of labeled trees of two special kinds, namely, uniformly labeled trees (i.e., trees with all their nodes labeled by the same symbol) and evolutionary trees (i.e., leaf-labeled trees with distinct symbols for distinct leaves). This paper presents an algorithm for comparing trees that are labeled in an arbitrary manner. In addition to this generality, this algorithm is faster than the previous algorithms. Another contribution of this paper is on maximum weight bipartite matchings. We show how to speed up the best known matching algorithms when the input graphs are node-unbalanced or weight-unbalanced. Based on these enhancements, we obtain an efficient algorithm for a new matching problem called the hierarchical bipartite matching problem, which is at the core of our maximum agreement subtree algorithm.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

On the Approximation of Computing Evolutionary Trees

TL;DR: Positive and negative results on the approximation of MAST, MCT and their complement versions, denoted CMAST and CMCT are presented and 3-approximation algorithms achieving significantly lower running times than those previously known are given.
Dissertation

Supertree methods for phylogenomics

TL;DR: This thesis proposes several algorithms to extract a maximum amount of speciation signal from multi- labeled trees and put it under the form of single-labeled trees which can be handled by supertree methods.
Book ChapterDOI

The maximum agreement of two nested phylogenetic networks

TL;DR: It is proved that the general case of MASN is NP-hard already for two phylogenetic networks, but that the problem can be solved efficiently if the two given phylogenetics networks exhibit a nested structure.
Book ChapterDOI

Faster Algorithms for Semi-matching Problems (Extended Abstract)

TL;DR: This work considers the problem of finding semi-matching in bipartite graphs and gives faster algorithms for both weighted and unweighted case.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Complete enumeration of compact structural motifs in proteins

TL;DR: An efficient divide-and-conquer algorithm that finds all copies of Q in G by partitioning Q using a minimum dominating set and can be extended to sparse query graphs that can be reduced to trees by deleting a small number of edges.
References
More filters
Book

Introduction to Algorithms

TL;DR: The updated new edition of the classic Introduction to Algorithms is intended primarily for use in undergraduate or graduate courses in algorithms or data structures and presents a rich variety of algorithms and covers them in considerable depth while making their design and analysis accessible to all levels of readers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Faster scaling algorithms for network problems

TL;DR: This paper presents algorithms for the assignment problem, the transportation problem, and the minimum- cost flow problem of operations research that find a minimum-cost solution, yet run in time close to the best-known bounds for the corresponding problems without costs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparing multiple RNA secondary structures using tree comparisons

TL;DR: This paper presents another approach to the problem of comparing many secondary structures by utilizing a very efficient tree-matching algorithm that will compare two trees in O([T1] X [T2] X L1 X L2) in the worst case and very close to O[T1?] for average trees representing secondary structures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Obtaining common pruned trees

TL;DR: The tree obtained by regrafting branches on to a largest common pruned tree is shown to contain all the classes present in the strict consensus tree.
Related Papers (5)