Open AccessBook
Australian federal government
About:
The article was published on 1971-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 38 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Federal Information Processing Standards & Government.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
‘Opening up’ policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia
TL;DR: In this paper, a Q study of fire management discourses in Cape York, northern Australia is presented which exposes the existence of four key discourses: rational fire management, conservation, pragmatic, locally controlled burning, and indigenous controlled land management.
Journal ArticleDOI
The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia.
Paul M. Garrett,Joshua P. White,Stephan Lewandowsky,Yoshihisa Kashima,Andrew Perfors,Daniel R. Little,Nicholas Geard,Lewis Mitchell,Martin Tomko,Simon Dennis +9 more
TL;DR: This paper assessed attitudes towards three tracking technologies (telecommunication network tracking, a government app, and Apple and Google's Bluetooth exposure notification system) in two representative samples of the Australian public prior to the launch of COVIDSafe.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparisons of cognitive ability and job attitudes of older and younger workers
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assessed samples of older and younger workers in objective tests of cognitive abilities and subjective job attitudes and found that older workers were as cognitively skilled for their job as their younger colleagues.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ethical Practice in Telepsychology
TL;DR: How existing technology and communication tools both challenge and support ethical practice in telepsychology in an Australian regulatory context is highlighted.
Journal Article
Definition of terrorism social and political effects
TL;DR: A suitable universal definition of terrorism remains elusive because different bodies, organisations and government agencies have different definitions to suit their own particular role, purpose or bias as discussed by the authors, which can affect communication and response to this issue and have consequences for society and politics.