scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Basin-ring spacing on the Moon, Mercury, and Mars

Richard J. Pike, +1 more
- 01 Oct 1987 - 
- Vol. 39, Iss: 2, pp 129-194
TLDR
In this paper, the authors show that the radial spacing between concentric rings of impact basins that lack central peaks is statistically similar and nonrandom on the Moon, Mercury, and Mars, both inside and outside the main ring.
Abstract
Radial spacing between concentric rings of impact basins that lack central peaks is statistically similar and nonrandom on the Moon, Mercury, and Mars, both inside and outside the main ring. One spacing interval, (2.0 ± 0.3)0.5D, or an integer multiple of it, dominates most basin rings. Three analytical approaches yield similar results from 296 remapped or newly mapped rings of 67 multi-ringed basins: least-squares of rank-grouped rings, least-squares of rank and ring diameter for each basin, and averaged ratios of adjacent rings. Analysis of 106 rings of 53 two-ring basins by the first and third methods yields an integer multiple (2 ×) of 2.00.5D. There are two exceptions: (1) Rings adjacent to the main ring of multi-ring basins are consistently spaced at a slightly, but significantly, larger interval, (2.1 ± 0.3)0.5D; (2) The 88 rings of 44 protobasins (large peak-plus-inner-ring craters) are spaced at an entirely different interval (3.3 ± 0.6)0.5D. The statistically constant and target-invariant spacing of so many rings suggests that this characteristic may constrain formational models of impact basins on the terrestrial planets. The key elements of such a constraint include: (1) ring positions may not have been located by the same process(es) that formed ring topography; (2) ring location and emplacement of ring topography need not be coeval; (3) ring location, but not necessarily the mode of ring emplacement, reflects one process that operated at the time of impact; and (4) the process yields similarly-disposed topographic features that are spatially discrete at 20.5D intervals, or some multiple, rather than continuous. These four elements suggest that some type of wave mechanism dominates the location, but not necessarily the formation, of basin rings. The waves may be standing, rather than travelling. The ring topography itself may be emplaced at impact by this and/or other mechanisms and may reflect additional, including post-impact, influences.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Geology and distribution of impact craters on Venus - What are they telling us?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed data on the distribution of impact craters on Venus and the effects of high ambient pressures and temperatures on the cratering process itself in terms of size, number, spatial distribution, and state of preservation of craters.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cratering History and Lunar Chronology

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors review the presently available data sets in support of this paradigmatic assumption, as follows: (1) the phenomenology of lunar impact craters, (2) the terrestrial record of the impact cratering process and the interpretation of terrestrial impactites as far as this “ground truth” is relevant for the interpretation, and (3) the theory and numerical simulation of the cratering processes and the characteristics of the Earth-Moon crossing population of impactors (asteroids and comets), the principles of relative age dating of lunar surface units and the
Journal ArticleDOI

Highly siderophile elements in the Earth, Moon and Mars: Update and implications for planetary accretion and differentiation

TL;DR: In this paper, a large database of the highly siderophile elements (HSE) in the terrestrial, lunar and martian mantles is presented, along with several hypotheses to account for the HSE present in Earth's mantle.

Highly siderophile elements in the earth, moon, and mars: update and

TL;DR: In this paper, the highly siderophile elements (HSE) present in the Earth's upper mantle and the martian mantle are broadly similar, and only about 200 times lower than those of chondritic meteorites.
Journal ArticleDOI

Chicxulub multiring impact basin - Size and other characteristics derived from gravity analysis

TL;DR: Reprocessed gravity data over Northern Yucatan reveal three major rings and parts of a fourth ring, spaced similarly to those observed at multiring impact basins on other planets.
References
More filters
Book

The Geologic History of the Moon

TL;DR: The most numerous and significant landforms belong to a size-morphology series of simple craters, complex craters and ringed basins that were formed by impacts as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acoustic fluidization: A new geologic process?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed that the low strength apparent in these phenomena are due to a state of "acoustic fluidization" induced by a transient strong acoustic wave field and showed that acoustically fluidized debris behaves as a newtonian fluid with a viscosity in the range 100,000 to 10,000,000 P for plausible conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Role of Ballistic Erosion and Sedimentation in Lunar Stratigraphy

TL;DR: In this paper, the applicability of base surge transport to lunar sedimentation, the ballistic transport of crater and basin ejecta, Copernicus crater ballistics, and the effects of ejecta impact on preexisting lunar ground are considered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lunar mascon basins - Lava filling, tectonics, and evolution of the lithosphere

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors extended the study of the relationship among mare filling, mare basin tectonics, and global thermal evolution to the major mascon maria: Imbrium, Crisium, Orientale, Humorum, Nectaris, Smythii, Grimaldi, and Serenitatis.