scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

TLDR
There does not appear to be a higher rate of complications or side effects with biologic mesh, but its benefit in reducing HH recurrence diminishes at long-term follow-up (more than 5 years postoperatively) or earlier.
Abstract
Background In 2006, we reported results of a randomized trial of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR), comparing primary diaphragm repair (PR) with primary repair buttressed with a biologic prosthesis (small intestinal submucosa [SIS]). The primary endpoint, radiologic hiatal hernia (HH) recurrence, was higher with PR (24%) than with SIS buttressed repair (9%) after 6 months. The second phase of this trial was designed to determine the long-term durability of biologic mesh-buttressed repair. Methods We systematically searched for the 108 patients in phase I of this study to assess current clinical symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and determine ongoing durability of the repair by obtaining a follow-up upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) read by 2 radiologists blinded to treatment received. HH recurrence was defined as the greatest measured vertical height of stomach being at least 2 cm above the diaphragm. Results At median follow-up of 58 months (range 42 to 78 mo), 10 patients had died, 26 patients were not found, 72 completed clinical follow-up (PR, n=39; SIS, n=33), and 60 repeated a UGI (PR, n=34; SIS, n=26). There were 20 patients (59%) with recurrent HH in the PR group and 14 patients (54%) with recurrent HH in the SIS group (p = 0.7). There was no statistically significant difference in relevant symptoms or QOL between patients undergoing PR and SIS buttressed repair. There were no strictures, erosions, dysphagia, or other complications related to the use of SIS mesh. Conclusions LPEHR results in long and durable relief of symptoms and improvement in QOL with PR or SIS. There does not appear to be a higher rate of complications or side effects with biologic mesh, but its benefit in reducing HH recurrence diminishes at long-term follow-up (more than 5 years postoperatively) or earlier.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Mesh Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh A Randomized Controlled Trial

TL;DR: No significant differences were seen for recurrent hiatus hernia, and the clinical differences were unlikely to be clinically significant, and overall outcomes after sutured repair were similar to mesh repair.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair

TL;DR: Quality of evidence supporting routine use of mesh cruroplasty is low and mesh should be used at surgeon discretion until additional studies evaluating symptomatic outcomes, quality of life, and long-term recurrence are available.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.

TL;DR: The use of mesh in the repair of large hiatal hernias is promising with respect to the reduction of anatomical recurrences, and this systematic review of the literature is a basis for high-quality randomized controlled trials to obtain the most effective and safeMesh in the long term.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.

TL;DR: Laroscopic repair of type III hiatal hernias is associated with a disturbingly high (42%) prevalence of recurrent hernia and more than half such recurrences have few, if any, symptoms.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Patch Repair vs Simple Cruroplasty for Large Hiatal Hernia

TL;DR: The use of prosthetic reinforcement of cruroplasty in large hiatal hernias may prevent hernia recurrences and the cost of the repair was $960 +/- $70 more in the group with the prosthesis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: A 28-case series

TL;DR: Complications related to synthetic mesh placement at the esophageal hiatus are more common than previously reported and Multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the best method and type of mesh for implantation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study.

TL;DR: Laroscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic cruroplasty is an effective procedure to reduce the incidence of postoperative hiatal hernia recurrence and intrathoracic wrap herniation after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.
Related Papers (5)