scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
An overview and critique of different conceptualisations of quality of life suggests that defining quality oflife in terms of life satisfaction is most appropriate, because this definition successfully deals with all the conceptual problems discussed.
About
This article is published in International Journal of Nursing Studies.The article was published on 2006-09-01. It has received 514 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Quality of life (healthcare) & Quality (business).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction

TL;DR: The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) as discussed by the authors has been used as a measure of the life satisfaction component of subjective well-being and has been shown to correlate with measures of mental health and to be predictive of future behaviors such as suicide attempts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?

TL;DR: It is concluded that the concept of HRQoL as used now is confusing and could be defined as the way health is empirically estimated to affect QoL or use the term to only signify the utility associated with a health state.
Journal ArticleDOI

Insomnia and health-related quality of life.

TL;DR: It is concluded from the relatively small literature that insomnia impacts on diverse areas of HRQoL, and that both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions can produce, to varying degrees, improvements in domains spanning physical, social and emotional functioning.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of reviews: exploring the relationship between obesity, weight loss and health-related quality of life

TL;DR: Improved HRQoL was evident after non‐surgical weight loss, but was not consistently demonstrated, even in randomized controlled trials, which may be attributed to variation in quality of reporting, assessment measures, study populations and weight‐loss interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

John E. Ware, +1 more
- 01 Jun 1992 - 
TL;DR: A 36-item short-form survey designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study is constructed.
Book

Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires

TL;DR: The theory and the leading methods of measurement, all of which rely on subjective judgments in questionnaires and rating scales are described, showing readers how to select the most suitable one, apply it, and score the results.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes.

TL;DR: There has been a nearly exponential increase in the use of quality-of-life evaluation as a technique of clinical research since 1973, when only 5 articles listed “quality of life” as a reference key word in the MEDLINE data base; during the subsequent five-year periods there were 195, 273, 490, and 1252 such articles.
Journal ArticleDOI

A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements

TL;DR: To evaluate how well quality of life is being measured in the medical literature and to offer a new approach to the measurement, original English-language articles having the term "quality of life" in their titles were identified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model

TL;DR: A theoretical model is proposed to clarify and predict changes in QOL as a result of the interaction of a catalyst, referring to changes in the respondent's health status, and a dynamic feedback loop aimed at maintaining or improving the perception of QOL.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Should quality of life be capitalized?

Based on the findings revealed by our review, we propose that the scientific community should revitalise the conceptual discussion on quality of life.