scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Delineating Soybean Maturity Groups across the United States

Spyridon Mourtzinis, +1 more
- 01 Jul 2017 - 
- Vol. 109, Iss: 4, pp 1397-1403
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Time to fl owering may be changing as soybeans’ genetics change due to breeding eff orts and genetic engineering and there have been signifi cant changes in soybean germplasm and management practices during the past 12 yr which could affect the environmental adaptivity of the current available varieties.
Abstract
1397 Soybean is the most important oilseed crop in the United States and its cultivated area is the second largest in the country aft er corn (Zea mays L.) (USDA, 2016). Th e cultivated areas include a wide diversity of environments from the Great Plains to the East Coast (Fig. 1). Maturity group zones represent defi ned areas where a cultivar is best adapted without implying that MG-specifi c cultivars cannot be grown elsewhere (Boerma and Specht, 2004). Maturity groups range from 000 for the very early maturing varieties to 10 (Boerma and Specht, 2004) for the latest maturing varieties. Gradations within MGs are also commonly noted by adding a decimal to the MG number. Maturity group is determined by two abiotic factors, photoperiod and temperature (Cober et al., 2001; Garner and Allard, 1930; Major et al., 1975; Summerfi eld et al., 1998; Wilkerson et al., 1989). It has been reported that short days promote development but when daylength is greater than a critical value the rate slows (Summerfi eld et al., 1998, 1993). Several studies concluded that elevated spring temperatures promoted earlier fl owering; however, fl owering timing diff ered signifi cantly due to photoperiod (Cooper, 2003; Hartwig, 1973; Major et al., 1975; Upadhyay et al., 1994). It has also been reported that soybeans’ growth is aff ected by a photoperiod and temperature interactive eff ect with genotype (Cober et al., 2001; Heatherly and Elmore, 2004; Summerfi eld et al., 1993). Four major genes (E1, E3, E4, and E7) have been identifi ed and characterized for their responses to long day conditions (Cober and Voldeng, 2001a, 2001b; Saindon et al., 1989a, 1989b). Additionally, major genes and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for fl owering oft en interact with one another to determine time to fl owering (Watanabe et al., 2012). Th erefore, time to fl owering may be changing as soybeans’ genetics change due to breeding eff orts and genetic engineering. Photoperiod is a constant value for specifi c time period and location and due to the strong relationship with soybean development, more than 45 yr ago, Scott and Aldrich, delineated hypothetical optimum MG zones across the United States based on photoperiod (Scott and Aldrich, 1970). More recently, Zhang et al. (2007) redefi ned the optimum MG zones using yield variety trial data from 1998 to 2003. Th ese authors found that adaptation regions for varieties with MG = 0 to 3 have not changed whereas, for varieties MG = 4 to 6 adaptation zones are much broader than those proposed by Scott and Aldrich. Nevertheless, there have been signifi cant changes in soybean germplasm and management practices during the past 12 yr which could aff ect the environmental adaptivity of the current available varieties. For example, soybean’s value Delineating Soybean Maturity Groups across the United States

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Planting Date, Maturity, and Temperature Effects on Soybean Seed Yield and Composition

TL;DR: Proper replanting methods and optimal final plant stands have been determined by Gaspar and Conley (2015), and yet, the proper MG to use in replant or late planting scenarios are unclear.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interplay between nitrogen fertilizer and biological nitrogen fixation in soybean: implications on seed yield and biomass allocation.

TL;DR: The cost of BNF was met by a relative change in dry matter allocation against the energetically rich seed, and in favor of energetic cheaper vegetative tissue, suggesting the decline in seed yield with increasing BNF.
Book ChapterDOI

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] breeding: History, improvement, production and future opportunities

TL;DR: The introduction and improvement of soybeans in the United States is described, which describes classical and molecular breeding, biotechnology, biotic and abiotic stress management, and soybean agronomics and cropping systems improvements that maximize soybean productivity, profitability and sustainability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimation of the Maturity Date of Soybean Breeding Lines Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imagery

TL;DR: The goal of this study was to investigate the potential of predicting maturity dates of soybean breeding lines using UAV-based multispectral imagery and found it promising and practical in estimating maturity dates.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Soybean Oil: Genetic Approaches for Modification of Functionality and Total Content

TL;DR: World consumption of soybean ( Glycine max ) in 2008 was over 221 million metric tons, with approximately 50% of this supply coming from U.S. production, where soybean plantings on an annual basis are over 77 million ha.
Journal ArticleDOI

A New Soybean Maturity and Photoperiod-Sensitivity Locus Linked to E1 and T

Elroy R. Cober, +1 more
- 01 May 2001 - 
TL;DR: E7 is a new flowering, maturity, and photoperiod sensitivity locus tightly linked to both El and T or, alternatively, a third allele at the El locus, which results in later flowering and maturity and sensitivity to long photoperperiods produced by incandescent lamps when compared to e7e7.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genetic and molecular bases of photoperiod responses of flowering in soybean.

TL;DR: The usefulness of a combined approach including QTL analysis, fine mapping, and use of candidate gene information from model plant species in genetic and molecular studies of soybean flowering is emphasized.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How does maturity group affect the solar radiation capture and water productivity of soybeans?

Maturity group affects soybean adaptation to different environments, impacting solar radiation capture and water productivity. Specific details on these effects are not addressed in the paper.