scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Discovering Indigenous Lands: The Doctrine of Discovery in the English Colonies

TLDR
In this paper, the legal adoption of the doctrine of discovery in the United States and its adoption in Canada is discussed. And the authors conclude that the still permeating influence of the Doctrine of Discovery in Aotearoa/New Zealand: 1970s-2000s.
Abstract
1. The Doctrine of Discovery 2. The Legal Adoption of Discovery in the United States 3. The Doctrine of Discovery in United States History 4. The Doctrine of Discovery in Canada 5. Contemporary Canadian Resonance of an Imperial Doctrine 6. The Doctrine of Discovery in Australia 7. Asserting the Doctrine of Discovery in Australia 8. Asserting the Doctrine of Discovery in Aotearoa New Zealand: 1840-1960s 9. The Still Permeating Influence of the Doctrine of Discovery in Aotearoa/New Zealand: 1970s-2000s 10. Concluding Comparatively: Discovery in the English Colonies

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

March 31, 2011
29236
29236
Discovering Indigenous Lands (9780199579815) @ $120.00/$96.00
9780199579815 $120.00/$96.00
Discovering Indigenous Lands:
The Doctrine of Discovery in the English Colonies
Robert J. Miller, Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School; Jacinta Ruru, Senior Law
Lecturer, University of Otago; Larissa Behrendt, Professor of Law and Director of
Research, University of Technology; Tracey Lindberg, Professor of Law, University
of Ottawa and Athabasca University
This book presents new material and shines fresh light on the under-
explored historical and legal evidence about the use of the doctrine of
discovery in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.
North America, New Zealand and Australia were colonized by England
under an international legal principle that is known today as the doctrine of
discovery. When Europeans set out to explore and exploit new lands in the
fifteenth through to the twentieth centuries, they justified their sovereign and
property claims over these territories and the indigenous peoples with the
discovery doctrine. This legal principle was justified by religious and
ethnocentric ideas of European and Christian superiority over the other
cultures, religions, and races of the world. The doctrine provided that newly-
arrived Europeans automatically acquired property rights in the lands of
indigenous peoples and gained political and commercial rights over the
inhabitants. The English colonial governments and colonists in North
America, New Zealand and Australia all utilized this doctrine, and still use it
today to assert legal rights to indigenous lands and to assert control over
indigenous peoples.
Written by indigenous legal academics - an American Indian from the
Eastern Shawnee Tribe, a New Zealand Maori (Ngati Rawkawa and Ngai Te
Rangi), an Indigenous Australian, and a Cree (Neheyiwak) in the country
now known as Canada, Discovering Indigenous Lands provides a unique
insight into the insidious historical and contemporary application of the
doctrine of discovery.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic Gender Violence and the Rule of Law: Aboriginal Communities in Australia and Post-War Liberia

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored the extent to which the Western concept of the rule of law impacts systematic violence against Indigenous girls and women in Australia and post-war Liberia, and found that although the principle of the Rule of Law is an emancipatory tool for justice and redress generally, it can also be an apparatus for persistent systemic violence against women.
Journal ArticleDOI

Uncovering Settler Grammars in Curriculum

TL;DR: The authors argue that the United States, and the evolution of its schooling system in particular, are drenched in settler colonial identities and that to begin to decolonize we must first learn to account for settler colonialism.

Deficit Discourse and Strengths-based Approaches: Changing the Narrative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health and Wellbeing

TL;DR: This article explored strengths-based approaches to shifting the deficit narrative in the Australian aboriginal and Torres Strait islander health sector. But they did not consider the impact of the deficit discourse on health itself.