scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of posterior corneal astigmatism on power calculation and alignment of toric intraocular lenses: Comparison of methodologies

TLDR
Comparing the accuracy of different methods that consider posterior corneal curvature in toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculations found that Residual astigmatism after toric IOL implantation can be reduced by appropriate consideration of the posterior cornea.
Abstract
Purpose To compare the accuracy of different methods that consider posterior corneal curvature in toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculations. Setting Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Design Retrospective comparative case series. Methods Consecutive cases of toric IOL implantation and preoperative measurements by optical biometry with optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) (Lenstar LS 900) and a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam) were retrospectively reviewed. Five methods of toric IOL calculation were compared as follows: (1) anterior corneal astigmatism using OLCR, (2) application of the Baylor nomogram, (3) posterior tomography combined with anterior corneal measurements using vector summation, (4) the Scheimpflug camera's true net power, and (5) total corneal refractive power. Toric IOL astigmatic power and axis, aiming for the lowest residual astigmatism, were selected according to these methods. Simulated residual refraction was calculated for each method based on manifest refraction and measured IOL alignment more than 3 weeks after surgery. Results The study included 115 eyes of 92 patients. The median simulated residual astigmatism was lower when based on vector summation of anterior and posterior astigmatisms than with calculations based on anterior corneal measurements only, application of the Baylor nomogram, true net power, and total corneal refractive power readings (0.49 diopters [D] versus 0.70 D, 0.60 D, 0.64 D, and 0.76 D, respectively) (P  Conclusions Residual astigmatism after toric IOL implantation can be reduced by appropriate consideration of the posterior corneal astigmatism. Using methods that take into account the effect of the posterior cornea in toric IOL calculations is suggested. Financial Disclosures Drs. Assia and Kleinmann are consultants to Hanita Lenses, Israel. Dr. Abulafia received a speaker's fee from Haag-Streit AG. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer combined with Placido topography and agreement with 2 Scheimpflug cameras

TL;DR: The high repeatability of automatic measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer (AS-OCT) combined with Placido topography and their agreement with those provided by 2 rotating Scheimpflug cameras supports its use in clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction Accuracy of Total Keratometry Compared to Standard Keratometry Using Different Intraocular Lens Power Formulas

TL;DR: A higher prediction accuracy can be expected by using TK values along with the two newly developed formulas developed for TK, which are compatible with standard IOL power calculation formulas and existing optimized IOL constants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Methodologies Using Estimated or Measured Values of Total Corneal Astigmatism for Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation.

TL;DR: The Barrett toric calculator and Abulafia-Koch formula yielded the lowest astigmatic prediction errors and direct evaluating total corneal power for toric IOL calculation was not superior to estimating it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Primary Topography-Guided LASIK: Treating Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Versus Topography-Measured Anterior Corneal Astigmatism.

TL;DR: To investigate whether topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with anterior corneal astigmatism measured on the WaveLight Contoura leads to better refractive outcomes compared to treating on the clinically measured manifest refractiveAstigmatism axis in eyes with primary myopic Astigmatism, retrospective analysis of 1,274 consecutive LASIK eyes found outcomes were both statistically and clinically inferior.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.

TL;DR: Conventional K and TK for IOL calculation showed strong agreement with a trend toward better refractive outcomes using TK, and emmetropic IOL powers in all formulas for both groups were very similar, with a Trend toward lower MAEs and MedAEs for TK when compared with K.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations

TL;DR: The improved accuracy of the new formula was proven by performing IOL power calculations on 2,000 eyes from 12 surgeons and comparing the results to seven other currently used formulas.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism.

TL;DR: Selecting toric intraocular lenses based on anterior corneal measurements could lead to overcor correction in eyes that have with‐the‐rule astigmatism and undercorrection in eyes which have against‐the-ruleAstigmatism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Calculating the surgically induced refractive change following ocular surgery

TL;DR: A ten‐step method of calculating the spherical‐ and cylindrical‐induced refractive change in a manner suitable for a programmable calculator or personal computer is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism

TL;DR: Analytical methods for evaluating the results of keratorefractive surgical procedures and emphasize the importance of intraocular astigmatism and the limitations of manual keratometry are demonstrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses: Effect of posterior corneal astigmatism

TL;DR: Corneal astigmatism was overestimated in WTR by all devices and underestimated in ATR by all except the Placido–dual Scheimpflug analyzer.
Related Papers (5)